I just could not help but feel that there had to be a better option out there. This was assigned reading for an intro to Old Testament class, so it seems like an obvious choice, but it's extremely basic and bland. There were times in which some students in the class even wondered if Arnold was a person of faith or not because he seemed to paint everything as unreliable or suspect. If you have absolutely no previous knowledge of the Old Testament this can get you started, but as I stated above, I can't help but feel there has to be a better option out there. There was also this ongoing fascination with the Hebrew Scriptures bringing about the whole idea of monotheism. That was THE thing that Old Testament is really good for it seemed to Arnold, but he also wanted readers to understand that the Hebrew Scriptures in no way necessarily deny the existence of other gods and that was to be respected.... it just felt like an odd emphasis that was stated throughout the textbook. In response to some of the students' concerns our professor said that Arnold was actually a very dedicated believer, but because he was writing for Cambridge Press he had to treat the topics more liberally. He certainly did a good job of that, but it ended up leaving it bland and much to be desired. This may be ideal for a liberal arts college that just wants to present a broad overview of the Hebrew Scriptures, but to be foundational reading for master's students at a theological seminary was astoundingly underwhelming.