What is a novel, and what makes a novel great? These are 2 separate questions. The first - what counts as a novel - depends on who you ask, and there are all kinds of ways to categorize it. But the second - what makes a novel truly good - comes down to 1 essential thing: its ability to capture the subtlety and complexity of human nature. In my view, the greatest, most exceptional, and timeless novels also share 1 killer trait: a remarkable sense of foresight.
Dubliners checks all those boxes - and then some. It’s got 2 standout qualities: clean, concise language and a kind of quiet warmth that still resonates nearly a century later. Reading it today feels effortless, like there’s no distance at all between us and the people in it. The Dubliners become a kind of eternal tribe - always relatable, always present. It makes me wonder: who’s preserving the emotional essence of the people who once lived here, where I am?
James Joyce did that for Dublin. Even though publishers there treated his book with indifference or even cruelty, he didn’t respond with a cold or bitter work. He created something alive - an organic, breathing portrait of Dublin itself.
There’s a mountain of scholarship on Joyce and his role as a pioneer of modern Western literature, but Dubliners is something else entirely - it’s a strange, living book.
It opens with death. The first story is about a paralyzed priest who dies, tormented by guilt after accidentally breaking a sacred chalice. That guilt eats away at him, changing him slowly until his body gives out. The final story also deals with death, but this time it’s a young man who dies too soon. Yet his deep, unforgettable love leaves a mark on the woman he loved - almost like he’s reborn through her, or summoned back in some spiritual way.
The simplicity of the language and the themes reminded me of some writers I’ve read. In my reading journey, the latest links in the chain include J.M. Coetzee, a master and a bit of a spiritual extremist; Orhan Pamuk, whose imagery of trees instantly brought to mind (I dare say) his best work My Name is Red - though his hurried brilliance always makes me a little suspicious. Then there’s Herta Müller, known for her dense, suffocating blocks of consciousness and obsessive detail. (Reading Nobel laureates is kind of a time-saving strategy - it’s like jumping straight to the semifinals instead of slogging through the auditions.)
Of course, themes like love, accidents, missed chances, randomness, death, and youth are everywhere. And one of the closest inheritors of this tradition - who’s also managed to break into mainstream popularity - is Haruki Murakami, But even Murakami’s warm, uplifting energy doesn’t quite surpass the emotional heat Joyce brings in Dubliners.
What amazes me is how the collection of characters in this book somehow fuses into 1 composite figure. From witnessing death as a boy, to first love, youthful wandering, workplace struggles, proposals, engagements, marriage, regret, possible affairs, parenthood, aging, and finally death and peace - this person’s name is “The Dubliner.” It’s like the final conclusion of a deep excavation into human nature, the way we might talk about “Peking Man” or “Hemudu Man.”
It’s also like a pixelated portrait, built dot by dot until it forms a grayscale image: black top hat, pince-nez glasses, a little mustache, and gray-green eyes - eyes that are going blind, but somehow growing more perceptive inside.
Even after a hundred years, this book can still spark something in the soul, still call out to us. Its fire and force pull “humanity” out from under the umbrella of religion and stretch it across that entire territory. I see silent figures in the shadows of the century - people who, through loneliness or hardship, are with me. Through misfortune or sudden clarity, they’re with me. No matter the time, place, or name.
Whether it’s A Painful Case or The Dead, these stories play out every day. In the first, someone misses the feast of life chasing false holiness and fantasy. In the second, a man dies, but his fierce love lives on inside a woman’s spirit - like a kind of emotional parasitism. Through her, he continues to exist, becoming someone even her husband can’t fully grasp.
It makes me think: maybe reincarnation isn’t just meaningless repetition. Maybe it’s more like a DNA spiral - each turn involves choices, gains and losses, and that’s what gives life its energy and vitality. It reflects the compassion of the original creator. And of course, there are those fleeting, slightly absurd moments of shock and confusion - like in An Encounter or A Little Cloud - that feel like comic interludes in a grand opera.
4.6 / 5 stars