Ibn ‘Arabi was a thinker.
I need a reminder that existence is near impossible. But I don’t feel it in my nervous system anymore, at least not sober.
When I’ve thought to remember this infathomable existence when depressed it doesn’t help.
But this knowledge helps my actions. Spontaneity has no downside. The fear of prison is low, but still horrible.
Names make remembrance possible. This is profound. As the name of prison strikes fear into the law-conscious citizen. The name of Martin, Luther, and John should bring about biblical stories of moral lessons which are part of one.
Like the name of Singapore Airlines has me remember my food poisoning fish meal.
At worst an inefficient encyclopaedia, in this it’s overwritten and lacks perspective. It tells you seeking knowledge should be done on one’s own—by reading the original text, if translated and coming to conclusions—hopefully retaining as much of the original as possible. I think my biggest issue with its definitions of terms is that it gives no practical examples. It would be interesting to know how these thoughts would shape the lives of the people that read and live by them.
To pinpoint an inefficient flaw with the piece is how Chittick uses Ibn ‘Arabi’s name at points and then writes with an understanding that we should know he is telling us Ibn ‘Arabi’s perspective without saying so directly. I think he should’ve scrapped the use of the name and said at the start, everything I write is an introductory simplification of Ibn ‘Arabi’s thinking based on his writings, etc.
Ibn ’Arabi understands that religious texts have not been clear. Do not paint the way to act, but provide morals with which to act. I guess his addition to the Qur’ an, as far as I can gather from Chittick, is in telling man how to perceive reality through the lens of the Qur’ an. Though to grace all interpretations would be too radical, He says it must be supported by the words. When Trump inacts a crime against god it is for power outside of religion, money…
If you can see under an image you are on the path of once unknown secrets.
For me I want goodness because I know the feeling of goodness and it is the best feeling. People who act with hatred or no care for others, who aren’t spreading goodness deserve eternal fire but they won’t get it. Their selfishness is based on lies that most of us uphold, that laws and systems uphold. If we were a community based society we would strive to strengthen our communities in ways that benefit, the evil then might be localised war, which has it’s own systems of honour (bring science into it, make it about killing and not honour or resources and those villains deserve eternal fire).
Reading about Ibn 'Arabi this way also strips it of the historical interest, because I am not reading a thousand year old man's writings but a modern, flawed academic's.
“Quiddity” essence or distinctive feature in something.
“It is beyond all of us what he designs.” These words spoken into my head without my control. Well, I allowed it to finish the thought as I caught the words as they came in up until “beyond all of us” I focused on the thought to hear “what he designs” though it’s in tune with the book I’ve been reading and not very surprising for an intrusive thought, if I can call it that.