Decent Introduction
Met. Hilarion’s introduction to the faith is alright, although his viewpoint seems at times a bit too liberal, perhaps reflecting his western education. Some sections need reworked, including the nonsensical treatment of evolution, which seems to offer opposing viewpoints from one paragraph to the next, in the manner of a politician. He seems altogether too optimistic about the prominent academic Orthodox writers of the 20th century, and he even at one point quotes the great saint Ignatius (Brianchaninov)’s critique of the RC dogma of the immaculate conception in an out-of-context manner in such a way as to make the great saint and conveyor of patristic life as somehow dissonant with liturgical praises of the Mother of God. An experienced reader of Russian theologians will detect in some of these comments an agenda, which is unworthy of this otherwise bright and traditional hierarch.
There are often things about which he doesn’t seem to say enough. He will hint at universalism while denying it in an official manner in a later chapter. I read both of these first volumes and while there is valuable information, I totally sympathize with the critiques of his thought from more traditional Russian Orthodox teachers such as the hieromartyr and missionary, Fr. Daniel Sysoev.