“Small Comfort” is a collection of five semi-interconnected stories/novellas that all center around explorations of wealth, financial status, and power. From an experiment conducted via rounds of rigged Monopoly games to a couple feigning their marriage every summer in order to maintain their future inheritance, “Small Comfort” prompts the reader to reflect on current economic systems, who benefits from them, and who is willing to acknowledge the injustice of these systems. Through various formats, such as interview transcriptions, letter/email correspondence, and lab reports, the construction of these stories adds an interesting layer of texture to these class examinations.
Despite the unique set-up of a lot of these stories and the relevant messaging behind them, I still found myself overall a bit underwhelmed with this collection as a whole. I think almost all of these stories were a bit long for what they intended to accomplish; and despite liking each story for the most part, I felt disengaged by the end of each one. Within each story, I found that some of the talking points became redundant due to being slightly too long. I’d say that my favorite story was “The Loser’s Claustrophobia” which follows the Monopoly experiment: one player is very obviously given the upper hand when playing (collecting more money when passing “Go,” rolling with both dice while their opponent gets a singular die, etc.), and how the winner views themself as being superior, more intelligent, and luckier than their opponent, despite the clear obstacles the loser faced which the winner did not. This clear metaphor for those with accessibility and proximity to wealth was fascinating, and the mix of prose and lab-report writing style made this a unique story. However, it unfortunately overstayed its welcome by about 10-20 pages, making some of the talking points, as I mentioned, redundant and repetitive.
I do think that these stories do have a lot to say on the themes of capitalism and social class, and these themes are tackled in an interesting way, so I don’t necessarily dissuade anyone from picking this collection up. If you’re open to a unique blend of style and structure in your narratives, and enjoy more of a literary approach to capitalistic commentary, I think you could enjoy these. But ultimately, I found my time with this collection to be a bit mediocre. Not bad by any means, but not extraordinary either.
Thank you to NetGalley and HarperVia for the advance eARC in exchange for an honest review!