A boy of fourteen goes missing and his parents, the central characters, are naturally distraught. The tale follows them as they seek police help, hunt for their son and gradually draw apart under the stress. As their lives have to move on, they each find other partners and the stress of the son's disappearance continues to be a major factor, although it is some time before the concept that they have been manipulated really sinks in with them.
Seen as a psychological study, we have to admire the author's look under the surface of suburban life and the tensions on a family struck by an open-ended tragedy.
Some aspects of this story are well done and characters well drawn. I found however that other aspects needed a lot more research and police procedures in particular. The formatting is peculiar in that the paragraphs do not start on indents - it is so easy to set each paragraph automatically starting on an indent that the lack appears amateurish. Spelling is occasionally faulty - as a chest of 'draws' which should be drawers; there are apostrophe confusions which could be sorted out by an editor. On the other hand, nice local phrases are used and we get a real feel for the situation.
Looking at the missing persons enquiry: when a person under age has gone missing, the police take immediate steps. They do not wait for forty-eight hours before getting concerned, especially as the child has no prior record of absence. An adult is allowed to go somewhere without telling anyone, but a child of fourteen is assumed to be at risk. The police would immediately ask for a photograph and within a short time would send an officer to check all through the house and especially the child's own room, with the parents' co-operation. They would form an impression of the home life and family tensions while doing this, would seek clues as to the disappearance and would ascertain that the child was not hiding or hidden on the premises. All the more so since in one real case, a small girl's body turned out to be wrapped in plastic and hidden in the attic. The police would also on the first day ask about any relatives the child has that he might have gone to visit. We do not know of any relatives until halfway through the book when the mother goes to stay with her own parents, who live in the same town. The mother never even contacted them earlier in the story (that we know of), which is just unreal.
A police officer can ask someone to come to the station for questioning, then either let them go, or arrest them. A police officer cannot 'throw them in a cell overnight' without arresting them. If a witness or suspect is not under arrest they are free to go. If they are under arrest this will be said aloud and they will be read their rights, mainly that they have the right to remain silent but it may harm their defence in court. They will have the right to a solicitor and if they cannot afford one the state will appoint one. The parents in this case would certainly have demanded a solicitor (but probably paid for one) as soon as it became clear that they were under suspicion of causing their son's disappearance. The police in this story do not comply with the Police And Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) so would rightly lose their jobs.
A credit card statement is said to contain purchases the parents did not know about, at the time of this teen's disappearance. The parents would have a) told the police and b) been onto their card company at once. No credit card owner wants uncontrolled purchases made on their card and would suspect a teenager, or a foreign phisher, equally but would get it stopped. They would cancel the card and get the money refunded immediately. The police would not just dismiss this without even asking to see the statement or what was purchased. If a train ticket or plane fare was purchased, that would tell them one thing; if a camera or such was purchased, they would want to know if it was bought on line, in a foreign country or in a nearby shop in person; if goods were purchased which did not show up, it would be assumed that they were sold to fund drug purchases. More so as the teen was clearly unreliable by this point. Nobody even mentions drugs as a cause for unreliable behaviour which would be the first assumption these days.
No CCTV is ever mentioned. Ever. A witness places the boy on a bus; the police would take the CCTV from the bus and check for him. Footage from near his school and transport links would be checked. Sightings are confirmed or dismissed by street cameras, shop cameras, public transport cameras these days. Britain is the country with the most CCTV cameras in the world. A home video is produced but that is a different issue. No journalists turn up on the doorstep asking family or neighbours for stories. After a new development some years later, the police are not informed and play no part, nor do the press. You think?
I'm sorry to sound negative, but on top of the great work done on the human side, the author seems to be letting down both himself and his story by not getting basic and important facts right. I have to take it that the author is himself under age and doesn't have a credit card or read police procedural books. I'll be very interested to see what he can turn out in a few years when he's got on top of that end of matters. In the meantime take this story Missing as a psychological chiller.