This was another of my random discoveries at the library; I checked it in and it looked interesting. My initial impression was of various landscape art and manipulations of natural materials reminded me a bit of the work of Andy Goldsworthy, whose work I have also encountered through library books. Finding images of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial both surprised me, since I hadn't known anything of its origin, and convinced me the book was worth looking at.
Though I enjoyed the works depicted in the book, I felt like the accompanying text often highlighted aspects of the works that were not evident in the pictures, making clear the limits of their depiction. Also, the incredibly understated nature of the works led me to a questioning of the nature of artists and how works are framed by the narrative that surrounds them and the mythology of the artist. How different are her land waves from the work of a landscape architect making a pleasing spread of lawn with a gentle rise? And on the Columbia River project, she notes that much of the work was removing invasive species and renovating the natural habitats, which feel like very basic ideas. This isn't a knock against her, but more a complaint about how society views things, that though there is great and obvious beauty in the understated and in creating things that fit with the natural world, it is only appreciated by having the work presented as the creation of an Artist.