Not my cup of tea on a number of fronts.
I did not enjoy the writing - repetitive, overly ornate. I did not enjoy the rhetoric - straw man arguments, simplistic, factional thinking, repeating as fact opinions about "the liberal establishment Democratic party".
And I did not like the politics. Not necessarily the revisiting of the Republican 2016 Greatest Hits (Sibelius, emails, Obamacare, Benghazi, Bo Bergdahl), or the lazy shortcuts about big government vs the panacaea of the free market and private enterprise. The author does not make any attempt to explain what his vision for conservatism actually is.
One example is the story about a town hall in Baltimore where he points out that the wealthy are sending their kids to well funded schools in the suburbs, while inner city schools are underfunded, due to education being a mandate funded by property taxes at a local level. I *agree* - I think most people would - that this is wrong. But the Republican party wants to gut the Department of Education, and send the education mandate back to the states. How does that do *anything* to provide more funding to inner city schools? Using local taxes for education is one of the most perverse injustices in the US. The people who most need funding get the least. The question is how to fix it? He presents no solution.