I received an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.
This is a book intended, I think, to be a sort of paranormal detective noir. It started off with that voice, the broke, run-down, disillusioned detective with a "curse" that has cost him a marriage, and sometimes clientele. His life changes (not necessarily for the better) when he is "hired" by an angel trying to stop the apocalypse by stopping the the first horseman, listed as Conquest.
I think overall the story was unique, had a strong voice and kept a quick pace. I wasn't ever bored. However, it is in some serious need of revision. The story was rather short and choppy. Some aspects of the angels, fallen angels, Eliouds, the weaponry and the vision of hell were not well fleshed out making the reader wonder about motive and ability of all the various levels of angel and demon and nephilim.
The idea of a heavenly 'nuke' was funny and intriguing, but how it worked, and what it did was really unclear even when it was being wielded. It also seemed important at one point then was sort of taken for granted at another.
The concept of guardian angel and guardian demon were also interesting, but were never really explained and also left the reader wanting. I really wanted to know more about the Eliouds, since Sam is one and we have the character of Gemma popping up to tell him about it then disappearing. I'm hoping those would be better explained in a later book in the series.
Overall, I generally judge a book by characterization, readability and if I want to read the sequel. I picked up this book because I was fascinated by angelic biker gangs, and a paranormal detective. Although there were bikes, angels on bikes and one lowly biker bar, I was disappointed this wasn't further explained or used in the story. The characterization was weak. Sam started off the first chapter strong, and although he narrates it, I lost the feel of his character somewhere along the way. I was left thinking the book was OK, but I didn't feel a burning urge to read the sequel.
Finally, although the book had a few minor errors in editing, (and this is probably just me being picky) I was constantly cringing at the constant use of the word 'whilst.' I realize that the author is British and that usage of the word is a more acceptable one in Britain, yet it leaves the American reader thinking that the writer is trying to sound uppity. On one page it was used six times. By the end of the book I was cringing constantly. It would work if used by the angels, or only one group of angels to distinguish them as slightly out of touch, but it was used liberally by everyone and in the narration.
So although I liked the book, I wouldn't probably re-read it, look up the sequels or recommend it. It wasn't bad; it just needs more work. It could be great.