I am usually a huge and appreciative fan of Paul O. Zelinsky's artistry and style, but with Swamp Angel, I actually find his accompanying illustrations to Anne Isaac's prsented narrative both much too over-the top for my liking and even potentially weird and disturbing in certain places (yes, the pictures are expressive, detailed, with a sense of and for both reality and imaginativeness, but especially Angelica's often exaggerated facial features leave me cold, and sorry, some of the depicted wrestling poses of Swamp Angel and Thundering Tarnation have an almost sexual feel to them, at least they do so for me). And while I definitely can see and understand how and why Zelinsky won a Caldecott Honour designation for Swamp Angel, on a purely personal and aesthetic level, his illustrations (this time) simply do not at all work for me.
Furthermore, and as I have never been all that much of a fan of North American so-called tall tales, this original and thus composed offering by Anne Issacs also never really manages to either enchant or entertain me. For as a story in and of itself, Swamp Angel is quite simply too long, and really not at ALL angelic in nature and scope, as I personally have huge issues with the fact that Thundering Tarnation is destroyed, is killed, simply because the bear has ransacked food stores (as from the text of Swamp Angel, it becomes readily apparent that while the beast is indeed a major and annoying nuisance, Thundering Tarnation is also not really ever much of a threat to life and limb, just to the settlers' stored provisions, and I frankly would have much preferred a different ending, with the bear bested by Angelica, chastised, perhaps even being driven off, but remaining alive).
And finally, while I can and do always appreciate traditional tall tales for their folkloristic contents, for their traditional sources (even if as tales, they are generally not all that personally appealing), the fact that Swamp Angel is NOT even based on tradition, but is just an original and thus, for me, rather artificial tall tale type makes it (unfortunately) totally uninteresting to and for me (both aesthetically and especially academically). I do admit and even realise that I often enjoy and even cherish original Kunstmärchen-type fairy tales as simply delightful, readable stories, but I guess I am just not enough of a North American tall tales enthusiast to like (or even much appreciate) Anne Isaac's printed words, her text. And thus, although I do find it cheering to have a strong and Amazon-like woman appear as the heroine, I just am not able to take enough pleasure from the story of Angelica wrestling with Thundering Tarnation, both textually and artistically, for me to rate Swamp Angel with more than one star (was debating a two star rating, but no).