A rather dry overview of how a potential air war could have developed over Europe if there ever were a conflict between the Warsaw Pact and NATO in the late 80s / early 90s. Each chapter is a combination of summarization by the author and direct quotes from a high-ranking officer involved in each aspect of air warfare. There are chapters covering high-speed, deep-penetrating interception, close air support, the role of helicopters, electronic warfare, etc. No mention of long-range and/or strategic bombers, however.
Every officer spoken to is also highly orthodox and dogmatic. They are very committed to the singular role whichever aircraft they specialize in is designed for and are adamant that to use them in any other fashion would be wasteful, stupid, and off-mission, which would render them essentially useless and ineffective. Whilst I understand this thinking, because yes, these machines are highly specialized, I see this attitude leading to field commanders screaming into the radio for support and the air commander saying, "Nope, sorry...can't help you, well I could but we'd only by like 50% helpful. So, my aircraft will sit here and wait until our "actual" mission develops." It's also highly short-sighted in how these aircraft are designed with all the bells and whistles, but because of budgetary considerations, we only use like 1/3 of the bells and 1/2 the whistles. Each officer seems to also conclude that, because of this, the first few days of the war will be an exchange of all these weapons - and then we'll be out of them - so we'll go back to lobbing the cheap stuff at each other that we've been storing since the end of WW2.
Also, almost every officer spoken to pretty much comes to the conclusion that they believe no such war would ever manifest unless there were grave miscalculations made by either side - although they are all of the belief that in every single possible potential scenario the Warsaw Pact would always be the aggressor - always. Considering the USA's penchant for "preventative war" in the late 90s and continuing in to the 2000s, I have no faith in this assessment.