Right now I'm exploring books for our next round of picks for my mystery book club. This one started strong but ultimately won't make the cut. I was all set to recommend it for the first half of the book, but then things took a turn for the worse.
The jacket copy on the book is somewhat misleading. You go into the book thinking that it's all about a search and rescue, a first responder that just won't give up on a missing hunter. Plus the two main characters in the book are female, something quite unusual in a book about hunting and wilderness survival. And the book certainly gets off to a strong start. Amy Raye, the hunter, goes off to try to bag an elk with a bow by herself, away from the rest of her party. From the beginning, you can tell that there's a lot more going on than a simple hunting trip. You'll immediately want to know more about Amy Raye, why she's on this trip with friends instead of her husband, what's driving her to take off alone.
Next, we meet Pru, a Park Service employee specializing in archaeological protection of native artifacts and grounds on park lands. She also owns a search and rescue trained dog. I've never read about a character exactly like this, and was also immediately interested.
Tension builds quickly. Amy Raye goes missing, a bad snow storm is blowing in, and search conditions are degenerating quickly. The book takes place in the Colorado Rockies, close to where I live, and the terrain and feel of the setting are really authentic.
The book alternates chapters between Amy Raye and Pru. First we read more about Amy Raye's hunt, the details of how she prepares, what she takes with her as she heads into the back country, and her thought process as she goes after her elk. Next, we skip ahead a bit in time into Pru's POV, quartering treacherous mountain territory and trying to piece together where Amy Raye went with very few clues.
The first half of the book easily held my interest. And then it took a turn for the boring. Any Raye is stuck high in the mountains, and her story line becomes quite slow as she remains in place, thinking about her past. This is the way we get her back story, and that back story is most of the second half of the book. While her past is intriguing, it makes the forward motion of the plot grind to a halt.
The other problem is that Amy Raye's story quite frankly takes a turn into the unbelievable. While the detail about wilderness orientation and survival is good in the early part of the book, the last half asks you to believe that Amy Ray survives, with a badly broken leg, for several months in the back country during a Colorado mountain winter with only the gear she brought with her and a quarter of the elk that she killed to live on (along with some juniper berries and pinon nuts). While the author goes into some calculations about how many calories are in a pound of meat (lean vs. fatty), she doesn't take into account Amy Ray's injury and the cold, both of which will sap a lot of energy. We're asked to believe that she survives for months on perhaps 1200 calories a day. The author takes pains to say that she has muscle spasms from lack of salt, but what about the loose teeth and slower bone healing because of no vitamins? What about the fact that the elk quarter she lives off for months is refrigerated only by the wintry mountain air? Why does she wait for several months before even trying to hike out? Yes, I know that a broken bone would make it very difficult. But I'll tell you what's even more difficult: trying to hike out on an unset badly healed broken bone after months of malnutrition. The author seems to have some knowledge, but also some big blind spots about what's possible. If she was writing a more literary tale, maybe (just maybe) I could allow for some license. But because she has been so detailed in back country preparedness, hunter gear, search party protocol, I can't easily accept such glaring issues.
The other problem I have is more because of the jacket copy again. It says that Pru just won't give up looking for Amy Raye, but she totally does! The search is called off after only a couple of days due to the weather conditions, and everybody is convinced that Amy Raye is dead. Pru does do a bit of investigation into where Amy Raye's elk kill could have been made, but she's trying to find out what happened for body recovery purposes and to help the family find some closure, not because she ever thinks that Amy Raye is still alive.
And the story ends in the clunkiest deus ex machina way I've seen in a while. Although Amy Raye holes up in a cave with pictographs, this never links up with Pru's archaeological purview in any way, so that interesting choice of expertise never pays off in the story line.
The book is well written. The language is spare yet descriptive. These are women that don't use unnecessary words, who need solitude in the great outdoors instead of people. Their emotions come through strongly, and I was interested in them (although I wasn't especially fond of Amy Raye, more for her poor choices in the wilderness than her sexual issues). But I'm not sure that the author knew exactly where she wanted to go with this book. Did she want it to be an Anna Pigeon style park ranger mystery series focused on woman .vs nature? Did she want it to be a Jack London style literary use of the wilderness to explore themes of loneliness and loss? Did she want it to be detail-oriented or allegorical? If she really wanted a mystery, then probably using two viewpoints spoiled that, because all along we the readers are getting information about Amy Raye that Pru has no way of knowing. This extra knowledge defuses the suspense. While the first half of the book built strongly, it lost its way after the set up and totally failed to stick the landing. First half a 5, second half maybe a 2. That said, I would be willing to try the author again to see if she can nail the ending after having some practice.