The reviews I've read of this book are kind of harsh (if not stupid. Just as an aside: finding a book's subject matter "upsetting" is not reason to give it a * review, especially if you never even FINISHED READING IT. But I digress...). I do find it, technically, to be a little sloppy in spots.
But...
I got this book as "research" for the novel I'm working on (about a former porn star), but also because I find Barr's story fascinating.
Talk about a book that gives you an insight into true "rape culture" or "exploitation of women." I put those two terms in quotation marks because they get tossed around like the people who use them know what they really mean. The implication of their use is that, in 2014, a woman doing porn or a man looking at it are necessarily contributing to a "rape culture" or "exploitation of women."
But back in '40s-'50s Texas, if we are to believe this biography, there really LITERALLY was a culture of exploitation and rape, exemplified by what the author calls "the capture," where a young girl (usually in her teens) would get kidnapped and forced into prostitution. And that's what happened to Juanita Slusher (Candy's real name).
The "rape culture" in 40s-50s-60s Texas was a criminal operation in which kidnapped women were forced into prostitution and kept there until they either died or were (for lack of a better way of putting it) used up. They were kept there by force. Juanita, for instance, was picked up hitchhiking at age 15 and forced into it. Even BEFORE Juanita was "captured," though, as a child, she was serially sexually abused by relatives and close acquaintances of the family. Her story is doubly horrific, even though it ended with her escaping "the capture" and becoming a celebrity.
The worst thing about "the capture" was that it truly was "rape culture." The law ignored the problem, and in fact was part of it. Women were considered subservient to men; the prostitutes, therefore, "didn't matter," and in many cases, the police not only turned the other way, but essentially protected the pimps and the johns so that they could continue to exploit these women.
One big reason? Many of the men who frequented these prostitutes went on to prominent positions in the community, in business or government. A prostitute, therefore, was considered "expendable" compared to the reputation of the man who frequented her.
Juanita ended up married to two of the men who controlled her in "the capture," but somehow escaped the fate of a lot of these women, and through a series of breaks, became a dancer who took on the stage name Candy Barr, leaving prostitution and "the capture" behind. Candy became perhaps the best-known stripper of her time, performing not only at clubs and parties in Dallas, but eventually as a showgirl in Las Vegas.
Oh, and Candy had "a book."
According to Joe Ashmore, a former Dallas judge, and one of the few public officials who was willing to talk and be identified by name in the book, "the book" was"an address book of all the who's who" in Dallas... full, rumor had it, of the names of men who had "known" Candy back when she was turning tricks as "Juanita."
"Everyone looked for that book," Ashmore said. "And I can remember some old newspaper stories (saying) that that book was going to surface or somebody had that book," which would have been trouble... so, of course, as these men rose in prominence in the Dallas community, and gained more financial and political power, "they wanted to get (Candy's) happy ass out of circulation," said Ashmore. "They were becoming federal judges and people like that and they couldn't have their names known. Developers, builders, city planners, etc. Candy Barr wasn't putting a bite on them. They were scared. A minister would be ridden out of town on a rail if he messed around." No one, Schwarz writes, dared get caught in Candy Barr's address book.
The actual book was apparently just a list of first names and phone numbers that Candy used to book private dance appearances at parties. But the THREAT of "the book" meant that Juanita was harrassed by the police, busted for "vagrancy" and other charges, and, eventually, sent to jail for possession of an ounce of marijuana, serving three years of a 12 year sentence.
From this biography, I got the impression that Candy was someone who took her clothes off onstage not because she was an exhibitionist or because she was forced into it, but because maybe it gave her a little bit of a feeling of control over her body... in other words, by being a stripper, she actually was NOT being exploited any longer! After all she'd been through, what she was doing onstage was truly (to use two overused phrases) "empowering" and her "reclaiming her sexuality." Because up to her age of consent, she was anything BUT empowered, and everyone BUT her claimed and took and used her body sexually. To Candy Barr, stripping and dancing onstage was LIBERATION... her way of "taking back her body" and "taking control of her body and her sexuality" in ways she couldn't when she was caught in "the capture" all those years before... and I suspect, in ways that people who toss around all those bullshit phrases about porn (empowerment, demeaning, exploitation, rape culture, taking back your body, etc) could never REALLY understand.
"Juanita Slusher was a prostitute," she said later. "Juanita Dabbs (her first married name) was a prostitute. Juanita Phillips (her second married name) was a prostitute. All those Juanitas probably turned 4000 tricks a year. But Candy Barr was a dancer, an entertainer, a star. Candy Barr was the very essence of myself."
Fascinating, gripping reading and it's giving me a lot of great ideas for my novel and my characters.