A good read for people who are fans of Mark Twain and want to dig deeper into his biography, particularly into his life during the 1890's. In particular, I think I have a better understanding of Livy and the girls and their relationships with the man. The book reveals the odd stresses that the financial crisis introduced into this very wealthy family - on one hand Livy is revealed as a woman of honor with an idealistic sense of business. Having said that, she is also revealed as a very sheltered child of wealth, often with little or no understanding of how that wealth was accumulated in the first place. Let us start by being clear, Olivia Clemens lived a life of luxury from the time she was born to the day she died in her villa in Tuscany. Twain himself spent most of his adult life in the company of the ultra-wealthy of the time. They were in many material respects an extremely self-indulgent couple. There is a passage in which the author notes that Twain speaks of Livy spending her time "housecleaning". Given that she had a team of servants at that time the author speculates with mild sarcasm that Twain must have meant that Livy was spending her time telling the maids what to clean. Even in the midst of bankruptcy they lived a life of which most people can only dream.
That is what makes it all the more interesting to see the very real emotional distress the investment failures introduce into their lives. It is not merely comfort, it is their *status* that weighs heavily on Livy and Mark. Livy is horrified for the family to be seen as a failure at business, even given all their attempts to raise their daughters as gentlewomen far removed from the rough and tumble of business.
I think there is more there as well. It is the intrusion of the real world into a carefully crafted fantasy that Livy and Mark create for themselves in Hartford. For a time (briefer than you might think) they have what appears an ideal life. They have built an outrageously lovely mansion for themselves (visit it if you get the chance), they are the toast of Connecticut literary society, and they live a life of luxury and dilettantish study while they raise their three lovely girls. It is a land of children performing plays for their parents, while the parents write books that the world lauds, all of them wrapped in the moral smugness that comes of being wealthy, New England, abolitionist protestants.
And the business failures destroy that fantasy land. The mansion is too expensive to keep up so they shutter it with a never realized dream that they will return as a family to it again.
And that mansion becomes a symbol of a golden age in that family, a time when all was well, good, and proper. There is a sense that the Clemens are chasing that dream around the globe, promising themselves once they have regained their wealth they will live in that world again.
The fantasy was bound to fail regardless. First, the girls grow up. They do not stay cute puppies forever and they evince their own personal quirks, including tempers. They certainly cease to be as forgiving of Mark's temper, it is clear. Livy spends a lifetime quieting him, but it is clear that in additional to being charming Mark could be a tempest.
And then Suzy dies. And I think it is fair to say that in some sense the family as a cohesive unit never seems to recover. And that mansion instead of being part of the dream becomes a part of the nightmare that is the harsher side of life.
The irony is that all of this occurs as Mark, Livy, and Clara travel the world in first-class, denying themselves no travel luxury, and being celebrated as royalty all the way from Australia to India to South Africa.
Finally, I mentioned the moral smugness earlier - I think that is not quite fair and I should expand upon it. The book can also be seen as a portrait of a late 19th century wealthy New England abolitionist protestants, with all that entails. Much of their quasi-puritanism is sincere and heart-felt. They express Christian ideals with firm faith that they know the right and with serious humility in their own perceived sinfulness and unworthiness. Having said that, Mark is the Great Hypocrite. You do not need this book to know that, of course, but it comes through clearly enough. Moreover, knowledge of his hypocrisy does not bring change in behavior or adjustment of his philosophy to accommodate for real human behavior, rather it leads to rather grand condemnations of the whole of western mankind. It is as if he thinks and feels he can hide his own personal faults in the knowledge that all of men are sour, no-good beasts. He may not be worthy, he may be a sinner, a sycophant to the upper-classes, drinking his whiskey and playing cards while yachting with his best friend, a cut-throat businessman, but aren't all of mankind sinners, who really should all be wiped out anyway?
In other words, he may be a sinner, but the rest of you are worse.
It's a cheap moral trick and the difficulty with it is that it is not clear that it is even true. It is simply self-serving.
And that is one reason why this story is worth the effort of remembering and considering - there is a strain of faux-puritan philosophy that has and continues to riddle the American upper-class and I think Samuel Clemens is a fine very clear example of it.
It's hard to gauge the quality of the humor with which Twain regaled his audience. Was it the time and culture? Was it the delivery? Did you have to be there? Obviously the one-liners have held up over time - Twain is quite quotable. But these stories. I can imagine going to see them and enjoying a show based on them - in fact I can do more than imagine. Many years ago I went and saw Hal Holbrook's delightful stage show "Mark Twain Tonight".
But laughing my head off at these stories for ninety minutes? It is hard to see. There is obviously a cultural element involved as well.
Update - I've looked up Hal Holbrook's show from 1967 and by heaven he did the story of the old man and the ram... and the audience laughed and I laughed. Well. So there you go.
I don't think many of Twain's books actually hold up well for the modern reader. Huckleberry Finn certainly does, IMHO, remain a power story and moral commentary, but Puddin' Head Wilson and the like, well, not so much, again IMHO. It is curious that Livy and Mark wanted him to be remembered as a serious moralist with his great work to be "Joan of Arc".
The fact that I've been able to muse and think on these issues once again because I read this book further makes me glad I read it. So we'll end here and simply note "It's complicated".