This statement reflects the underlying purpose of The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Begun in the late 1940s by an international team of New Testament scholars, the NICNT series has become recognized by pastors, students, and scholars alike as a critical yet orthodox commentary marked by solid biblical scholarship within the evangelical Protestant tradition. While based on a thorough study of the Greek text, the commentary introductions and expositions contain a minimum of Greek references. The NICNT authors evaluate significant textual problems and take into account the most important exegetical literature. More technical aspects — such as grammatical, textual, and historical problems — are dealt with in footnotes, special notes, and appendixes. Under the general editorship of three outstanding New Testament scholars — first Ned Stonehouse (Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia), then F. F. Bruce (University of Manchester, England), and now Gordon D. Fee (Regent College, Vancouver, British Columbia) — the NICNT series has continued to develop over the years. In order to keep the commentary “new” and conversant with contemporary scholarship, the NICNT volumes have been — and will be — revised or replaced as necessary. The newer NICNT volumes in particular take into account the role of recent rhetorical and sociological inquiry in elucidating the meaning of the text, and they also exhibit concern for the theology and application of the text. As the NICNT series is ever brought up to date, it will continue to find ongoing usefulness as an established guide to the New Testament text.
Paul Barnett, former Anglican Bishop of North Sydney, Australia, is a Visiting Fellow in Ancient History at Macquarie University and Teaching Fellow at Regent College, Vancouver and Moore College, Sydney. He is a frequent traveler to Israel, where Christianity began, and to Turkey and Greece, to which it rapidly spread.
Excellent. Barnett writes with great clarity and precision. His insights into Paul's motivation for writing the letter, the Judaizing situation at Corinth, and his occasional notes about how Paul's message applies to a contemporary audience were all very helpful.
This commentary is perfect for its intended audience. Greek words and textual problems are mostly relegated to the footnotes while the rest is solid exposition of the text. If you're only going to get one commentary on 2 Corinthians, this is the one you need to get.
Paul Barnett is an Australian Anglican Bishop and is currently a fellow in ancient history at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia and a teaching fellow at Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia. As with most commentaries, much can be gleaned from the commentator’s Introduction. Barnett’s excellent Introduction to Second Corinthians is no exception. The author provides an excellent timeline and table of events of the Apostle Paul’s dealings with the Corinthian church, including assumed dates for his four letters and three visits (p.14-15). Barnett also defends the cohesive character of the letter and succinctly summarizes the Apostle’s four main objectives: (1) to explain and defend his actions against “false apostles,” (2) to explain how suffering is requisite for Christ’s apostolic ministry, (3) to encourage the church to resolve differences before the Apostle’s return, and (4) a pastoral encouragement and doctrinal corrective. Barnett concludes each central section of the epistle with a helpful pastoral application and summary. Allow me to provide one example of the wonderful encouragement found throughout this commentary, “Death, the grim reaper, leaves none unharvested . . . Everyone – believers included and with no exceptions – faces his inexorable scythe. But, thanks be to God, the believer, confident of the certainty of Christ’s resurrection as founded on the apostolic word, ‘knows’ that beyond death lies the sure prospect of ‘a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. . .’” I highly recommend this commentary for its orthodoxy plus its warm encouragement.
Definitely a good discussion of 2 Corinthians, but somewhat pales to 1 Corinthians and Gordon Fee's commentary. Recommend. I have a couple of other 2 Corinthian commentaries, but have not read them yet so I am unsure if there are better options.