I actually learn things that are not merely re-affirmations of what (I believe) I know about listening, awareness, and being in the present moment.
- We never runs out of Hows, not as much as attempts to understand the Whys (which, can get so individualized/specialized). Teachings to him create disharmony. Teachings make us start seeing things in fragments, depending on which guru is talking, we are slowly losing our own faith and ability to see an event in its completeness, which again, for each person can get so personalized. - Be wary of wants or desires, disciplines, principles, self-analyzing, meditation, setting goals, facing choices, consistency; go ahead and have those but be wary when they start distracting or limiting the flow of life/full of expresion of life/intelligent comprehension of the present/completeness of action (there, I compile all the words he used to describe continuity or completeness!).
- Be aware of your actions; are they born out from the harmony between the mind and the heart? Or are they taken because you want to get rid of pain, suffering, emptiness? But Pain, suffering, emptiness are part of our nature.
- Don't quickly jump to an action, a solution, a conclusion, but rather be aware of what triggers you to perform any action at all. An action that is not born out of harmony between the mind and the heart will only serve temporary gains or fixings.
So, stream through life freely. Naive? Maybe. For a person who is so used to planning and analyzing (me...), this sounds very discomforting.
Living in the age of absurdity and utter chaos, his words kinda make sense. So many repetitions in this book and I get why people called him not being straightforward, but I think it served a purpose or it needed to be like that.