DNF on page 38
**unmarked spoilers ahead**
I picked up this book because I love works of art that pull back the veneer on the harsh, gritty, uncaring world of ballet, and I love literary fiction. I thought that Sari Wilson's 2016 literary novel, "Girl Through Glass," would deliver both in spades.
I expected to read the literary version of one of my favorite movies: the 2003 Robert Altman indie film/almost-docu-drama, "The Company," about an aspiring ballerina performing with the renowned Joffrey Ballet in Chicago.
That film was based on a large amount of documentary research about the lived experiences of modern ballet dancers, and I love the screenplay and the framing of each scene. I love that movie so much. Also important to note: the stage itself is a character in the story. The scratched, dirty surface of the stage, the backstage the dancers move through, the industrial metal structures holding the lights up, the heat and glare of the lights, the threat of lightning and rain hitting the stage when it is located outside. It's thrilling to watch the structure itself come to life in a film, and have the full respect of the audience and everyone else in the movie.
The novel "Girl Through Glass" isn't really focused on the world of ballet, and after 38 pages, that fact is so clear to me that I must DNF.
While I do love literary prose, the writing in this book didn't satisfy me enough to overcome my dashed content hopes. The prose style in "Girl Through Glass" reminded me a lot of Amanda Coplin's prose in her 2012 novel, "The Orchardist." I would characterize her sentences as stolid and staid. That writing style works for a great many readers, but I just need more pizazz and poetry to stay interested.
There is a fine line between poetic impression and inference, and communicating the hard facts of a story. Sari Wilson's prose achieves poetic impression by scene cutaway and withholding information from the reader -- which is fine, a lot of books I love also do that -- but Ms. Wilson doesn't write with the level of pyrotechnic language-fireworks that I've come to expect from elliptical timelines. I'm afraid other authors have spoiled me for life, and I just can't ship this heavier, unemotional style of writers like Amanda Coplin and Sari Wilson.
The content of "Girl Through Glass" is mostly focused on the main character, Mira (which is the main character's name as a child in the 1970s) and Kate (which is the main character's name as an adult decades later), experiencing and surviving being raped as a child by a ballet aficionado, a man named Maurice.
When 11-year-old Mira first meets Maurice, he is a 47-year-old man "stricken with polio." Another Goodreads reviewer summarized the plot of Mira and Maurice in "Girl Through Glass" this way:
"He eventually rapes her, she becomes pregnant and gives the baby up for adoption, and later in her 40s her son finds her and they establish a relationship."
Another Goodreads reviewer described Maurice as "a creepy old man."
If author Sari Wilson is writing about an experience she actually had as a child in ballet school, then I truly apologize for DNF'ing this book. I don't know if this is memoir-ish fiction or not, but if it were billed as a memoir about surviving pedophilia and rape, set within the far-less-important competitive and callous world of ballet, my content expectations would not have clashed with this book.
Had I known that this novel was focused on pedophilia and the trauma and aftermath of being raped as a child, I would have preferred to reread Alison Espach's stunning debut novel, "The Adults." The characters in that book are much more bold and compelling, and the prose style in that novel features the language-pyrotechnics I crave.
The two narratives of "Girl Through Glass" (child-Mira's and adult-Kate's) are both sad and gray. In content and tone, every page I read of this book was washed in a cumbersome shade of pewter. I'm not opposed to this style, or the content of this novel. It's just completely at odds with what I thought I'd signed up for.
In the movie "The Company," the grimdark world of ballet is juxtaposed at all times with its glorious (false) veil of color and beauty. The film's audience sees the bright costumes and movement that the privileged ticket-holders consume, and then bears witness to the cruelties and purse-strings behind all those fluttering bodies.
In "Girl Through Glass," the first 38 pages featured no strident colors or electrified bodies. Everything is grimdark and sad. The story takes pains to elaborate on themes of ruination and failed struggle. The gray tone of the prose is as dull as the voices of Mira and Kate. Reading these pages, I felt like I was sitting in front of a windowpane on a drizzling day, trapped inside and staring at a colorless sky.
Though I did not finish this book, and did not meet Maurice on the page, I must also say that it makes me deeply uncomfortable that the pedophile rapist in this book has polio. Using physical disability, disease, and deformity as an attribute of a malevolent character is a common feature of literary ableism, and I confess that learning about Maurice's condition in other Goodreads reviews made me far more certain I should stop reading this book.
I would give "Girl Through Glass" a one-star rating for following such a terrible ableist trope, but if author Sari Wilson really was raped as a child by an adult man with polio, then my discomfort with the ableism in Maurice's character is highly unfair.
I'm going to leave this review unrated, since my biggest problem with this book is simply that it failed to live up to my expectations. Punishing the book with a one-star review for that reason feels profoundly unfair.
But I would like to add this final note: if author Sari Wilson simply added polio to Maurice to make him more menacing, creepy, and gross, thereby using physical disability and disease as a shorthand for "moral bankruptcy," then I would like to state that this kind of writing is ableist af and authors need to STOP. DOING. THIS. Because that kind of ableist trope is far more morally bankrupt than anyone surviving polio will ever be. The United States elected FDR President, for f*ck sake. Noble, amazing, wonderful people survive diseases. No one is less intrinsically good or possesses less moral integrity simply because they are less physically able. So please, authors of the world: for the love of all that is holy, knock this sh*t off.