Το Φιλοσοφικό Λεξικό του Cambridge

by Robert Audi, Στέλιος Βιρβιδάκης (Editor), Γιώργος Ξηροπαΐδης (Editor)

Το Φιλοσοφικό Λεξικό του Καίμπριτζ θεωρείται το πλέον έγκυρο λεξικό φιλοσοφίας στον κόσμο.

Γραμμένο από μια διεθνή ομάδα τετρακοσίων σαράντα συγγραφέων-επιστημόνων, προσφέρει στον αναγνώστη την πλουσιότερη, πληρέστερη και πιο επικαιροποιημένη μελέτη των σημαντικότερων ιδεών και θεωριών που ανέπτυξαν μείζονες φιλόσοφοι στην ιστορία του ανθρώπινου πνεύματος, καθώς και των φιλοσοφικών ρευμάτων που έχουν αναδυθεί από την εποχή της αρχαιότητας έως τις μέρες μας.
Το Φιλοσοφικό Λεξικό του Καίμπριτζ καλύπτει όλο το φάσμα της Φιλοσοφίας, από την αρχαία ελληνική φιλοσοφία έως και τα αναπτυσσόμενα πεδία της Φιλοσοφίας του Νου και της Εφαρμοσμένης Ηθικής.
Ταυτόχρονα, το λεξικό δεν περιορίζεται μόνο στην παρουσίαση της δυτικής φιλοσοφίας, αλλά στις σελίδες του περιλαμβάνονται εκτενή λήμματα και για την αραβική, την ισλαμική, την αφρικανική, την ιαπωνική και τη νοτιοαμερικανική φιλοσοφία.

Το Φιλοσοφικό Λεξικό του Καίμπριτζ συγκροτείται από 4727 λήμματα φιλοσοφίας, γραμμένα από 440 κορυφαίους συγγραφείς-επιστήμονες και μεταφρασμένα από 16 Έλληνες ειδικούς.

Genres: Philosophy, Reference, Nonfiction, History, Dictionaries, Textbooks, Theology

1384 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1995

Reviews

[Adriana Scarpin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Não tem como estudar filosofia e não estar bem equipada com dicionários mil, nem estou falando do meu big Houaiss e sim dicionários específicos de filosofia, mais ainda dicionários que abordam o autor alvo do estudo em que os verbetes estão direcionados especificamente para tal linha de pensamento. Não leria Lacan, Deleuze, Sartre sem seus vocabulários específicos, por exemplo.
Mas é fundamental ter também um dicionário de filosofia em geral como esse de Cambridge, tenho outros dicionários em e-book, mas gosto desse Cambridge porque ele abrange também os pós modernos que é na realidade o que mais estudo.

[Pamela Tucker · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a great reference book for the Philosopher, in that it has a really good comprehensive entries on major philosophers.

Everyone should have good reference books.

It is concise, well written, and easy to comprehend.

[Steven R. Kraaijeveld · Rating 5 out of 5]

I find myself reaching for this one quite often; its entries hit that sweet spot between being too brief to be informative and too lengthy to be able to read while under pressure (which, in academia, is a given).

[Sadia Mansoor · Rating 4 out of 5]

Attention to all Philosophy Teachers, Students & anyone interested in Philosophy

Now, you can have philosophical terms on your fingertips. Here is the dictionary to help you understand all the philosophy related words/terms. Also, you will find details about different thinkers & philosophers of various eras & their works in alphabetical sequence.

Check the dictionary right now >>> https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/podzim2014...

[Todd Hansink · Rating 5 out of 5]

Learning the history of philosophy takes a long time and is a lot like learning a foreign language. It is a long term task to try to learn the who? what? and when? of philosophy. I didn't read this book from front to back, but in a somewhat random order while always trying to comprehend the whole book at once."

[William · Rating 4 out of 5]

It's a good resource for reminding yourself the general thoughts of different philosophers and schools of thought. Great for beginning students of philosophy as it explains terms which are commonly happened upon in texts.

[Rob · Rating 5 out of 5]

very handy, detailed, scholarly, up-to-date, essential reference work for philosophers and theologians

[Matko · Rating 5 out of 5]

Best philosophical reference in print.

[John · Rating 5 out of 5]

Absolutely the best research on technical philosophy currently in print.

[David Goetz · Rating 4 out of 5]

Excellent summaries of philosophers, schools, etc. Non-western philosophical traditions are included, which is nice. Binding isn't the best.

[David · Rating 5 out of 5]

Currently "reading" second edition, would buy latest edition in thick hardback. One of three books you should take with you to a desert isle; an eternal source of ponder.
You bored? Open up a random page and read.

[Colin · Rating 5 out of 5]

I love this reference book. I like it much more than the Oxford counterpart. Anytime I have a philosophical question or want to understand a certain thinker, I pick it up.

[Veach Glines · Rating 4 out of 5]

Having perused this for many months, reading parts which lead me to read more, and more - this is the quickest way to learn about the vast range of past philosophers, different types and sub-types of philosophy, and quickly re-read aspects that did not sink in the first few times I read them. On my shelf to read for the rest of my life - will never be finished.

[Ginny · Rating 4 out of 5]

I would call this an encyclopedia not a dictionary. I picked it up at a used book store as a companion to all these Greek philosophies I’ve been reading of late. Especially with Diogenes’ Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, which was full of rumors, I wanted some guide post to understand what really was going on. I found this a very useful tool. There is a lot of biographical information - which was what I really wanted, and medium detailed explanations of various philosophical schools and movements.
I am marking the book as “read’ because I went through quite a bit, and I’m going to put it aside now, and pick up again as my go to resource for philosophy background/context.

[Jonathan]

Should be made into a hardcover

[Jeffrey · Rating 3 out of 5]

"Read" is not so true, use as a reference is better. Great resource.

[Felipe Romero · Rating 4 out of 5]

Está muy bueno, acompaña en la lectura de obras filosóficas. No me atrevo a decir que es el mejor ni tampoco que es el más completo, pero, de lo que encontré, es lo más cercano a eso.

[Charles Theiner · Rating 3 out of 5]

I mean. It's a dictionary. Wasn't exhilarating or anything.

[Paul Mojaver · Rating 5 out of 5]

I had both the Cambridge and Oxford versions, and would often compare entries. The Oxford is by a single author, and is much shorter. Aside from its physically bulkier size, I preferred the Cambridge in essentially every respect.

[Ruadhan Kinneavy · Rating 4 out of 5]

Essential aid for employing half-understood concepts in undergrad essays while typing in the dark hours of the morning.

[Henrik Haapala · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a large comprehensive dictionary of philosophy that I own, can’t find at the moment

[Paul · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent resource.