I had low expectations for this book, and it was still a total disappointment. The premise of John Milton's daughter going on an over-the-top quest never appealed to me, but since I greatly admire Anne Blankman as an author and historian, I gave the book a chance. For a while, I enjoyed it. The prose was excellent, the setting and period details were well-researched and woven in without info dumps, the characters were interesting enough, and the plot had good structure. I enjoyed how early details became significant later in the story, and I especially admired how well the author portrayed the tension between science and religion at that time in history. The characters' beliefs, words, and actions were initially realistic to their influences and the time and space which they inhabited, and this helped me overlook some silly story elements.
"Prisoner of Night and Fog," Anne Blankman's debut novel, was a masterpiece of ideological accuracy. That book is one of my all-time favorites, and whenever I recommend it to people, I praise how believably the character reevaluated and altered some of her fundamental presuppositions. I hoped that even though the plot and setting of "Traitor Angels" were not down my alley, I could still enjoy the story of this Puritan main character expanding her horizons and learning how to balance her biblical knowledge with new scientific understandings. For a while, it looked like the book was headed in that direction. I liked the dialogue and thought processes that grappled with scientific implications, trying to distinguish what was biblical truth and what was faulty tradition based on limited observation.
BUT THEN. The already fanciful quest narrative took a shocking turn, and the characters related the potential finding to Christ and concluded that he might have been raised from the dead through scientific means. Thus, he could have been human or divine. The characters reel from shock somewhat, but then conclude that it doesn't matter. The significance of Christ, they say, was his moral example.
The characters' primary concern is the political impact of this revelation. If church tradition were undermined and people found out that mortals could be raised from the dead, anarchy would ensue. Given the religious wars and contention in Europe at that time, this was a perfectly justifiable concern, but I kept jabbing new holes in the book's presentation of this idea. Most significantly, it isn't like Jesus was the one who came up the divine right of kings. Humans made that up, and even if you took Jesus out of the equation, they could still maintain that rulers were all God-ordained and unassailable.
My mental rating shifted from four to two stars. I reread sentences again and again, trying to accept the irrationality of an elixir that could raise people from the dead, and mocking the absurd idea that a 1666 Puritan would shrug off the divinity of Christ as a non-issue. In modernity, people developed nontraditional views on the incarnation, but no biblically literate person in any era can think that Christ's divinity is a non-issue. The New Testament relies on the narrative and implications of Jesus's lordship, perfect life, atonement on the cross for human sin, resurrection in victory over death, and fulfillment of God's redemptive plan and Old Testament promises. Judaism still stands when you discredit the entire New Testament, but you cannot take away Christ's divinity and saving work and believe that Christianity can progress. It won't be more enlightened. It will cease to be anything at all.
Would a 1666 Puritan REALLY think, "Ah, well, it's the moral example that matters" and not even THINK about the implications for forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting? This character lived and breathed in a world where religion was everything. Several chapters ago, she'd been aghast at the idea that the earth circled around the sun, and cited chapter and verse of Scripture passages regarding the earth's supposed central position. But here, she doesn't even notice that Christ's divinity is crucial to the faith she grew up in and is thoroughly educated about!
It doesn't occur to her that if Jesus wasn't God, He was a blasphemous, pathological liar. Jesus did all kinds of wonderful, good things, but isn't that all invalidated if he falsely claimed to be one with God, presumed to forgive sins, misled credulous people, undermined and rebuked religious leaders, and spoke as if he were the voice of God? We call those people cult leaders and brand them as dangerous. As C.S. Lewis famously pointed out, Jesus is either a lunatic, a liar, or Lord. The characters in this book were too dense and distracted to recognize this or veer from their entirely anachronistic platitudes about Jesus the great moral teacher.
If the characters wanted to entertain the thought that Jesus was merely human, so be it. I'm fine reading books written from and about belief systems different than mine. But for this to happen in a the historical setting in which this book was placed, they had to go through a significant shock process, consider the wide-ranging implications, recognize that the entire structure of Christianity is fraudulent, and think about potential alternative explanations for Christ's miracles, message of salvation, and behavior. (Lots of religious leaders lie pathologically, but most don't voluntarily allow people to brutally execute them. And there was no explanation of how the elixir would not only bring someone back from the dead, but also help them recover from a Roman crucifixion.)
Since the characters didn't think through ANY of the things which occurred to me as a biblically literate reader in a post-Christian society, it ruined the entire book for me. I was INDIGNANT that this unnecessary, illogical plot point shattered my patient, obliging suspension of disbelief. I wanted to like this book! I willingly overlooked silly plot elements, unlikely situations, and character development problems, and this is what I get in return? The ridiculous, distracting, anachronistic plot twist made the entire book seem fraudulent and risible, and even though the theme is supposedly the conflict between science and religion, all it had to offer to invalidate Christ was an absurd level of magical thinking with no logistical or scientific explanation whatsoever.