What do you think?
Rate this book
Diana: Closely Guarded Secret
Inspector Ken Wharfe, the first royalty protection officer to publish a memoir, was a crucial figure in the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, for nearly seven years. In that time, he became a close friend and trusted confidant who shared her most private moments. His first-hand account contradicts many of the so-called 'facts' about the Princess and provides an affectionate, if not always uncritical, insight into this complex, troubled, but ultimately fascinating woman.Here is the authentic voice of a man who played an important role during Diana's most trying times, and in her beloved sons' formative years, and who shows himself to be an exceptionally perceptive observer of the events that unfolded around the Princess. After Inspector Wharfe resigned his position in 1993 (making headline news), Diana announced her withdrawal from public life and axed her Scotland Yard protection - a decision her former 'top cop' believes led ultimately to her death.This account presents the most intimate portrait of Diana to date, as well as a fitting tribute to one of the outstanding figures of our age.
259 pages, Kindle Edition
First published September 1, 2002
515 people are currently reading
1206 people want to read
About the author
Ken Wharfe
7 books11 followersInspector Ken Wharfe, the first royalty protection officer to publish a memoir, was a crucial figure in the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, for nearly seven years from 1987. In that time, he became a close friend and trusted confidant who shared her most private moments.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 103 reviews
June 29, 2022
I must admit that this book has ended my fascination with Diana, Princess of Wales.
I "met" the writer, Ken Wharfe, during a 5-day Road Scholar seminar entitled, The Art Of The English Murder Mystery. With his Scotland Yard background (as a police officer, and later investigating Vice, Gaming and Drug offenses), his area of expertise for the gathering was the "police procedural" aspect of mystery novels. Wharfe had some fascinating encounters. He was one of the police officers on the rooftop of Apple Records when The Beatles gave their impromptu (and final) concert. He was involved in events leading to the apprehension of Scottish serial killer, Dennis Nilsen. And he later served as Personal Protection Officer for members of the Royal Family ... initially Princes Andrew and Harry, and then Princess Diana. All of that seems more than adequate for any one lifetime!
DIANA: CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET is filled with details and anecdotes about his time with the Royal Family. For much of it, the vignettes seem little more than "fill in the gap" material for Readers who have already devoured other books about Diana. Even so, sometimes the omissions are frustrating, such as a listing of general categories that are addressed during training as a Personal Protection Officer, and then pointing out that specific details are not allowed to be published. That makes sense, but still ....
However, in the final chapters, as the behaviors of the Princess become more erratic and secretive, my interest sharply peaked. This was fascinating insight from the perspective of a participant that I had known very little about before. Although he had left Diana prior to her death, he does offer his analysis of how her security had been wanting, almost predicting a tragic conclusion.
I mentioned at the beginning of my comments that this book has ended my fascination with Diana. Although the writer does not offer a medical opinion regarding her temperamental mood swings, he does debunk suggestions of madness or that she was delusional.
However, from his descriptions, it would seem to me (as an admitted layman) that the Princess showed signs of what I would call "arrested development." Specifically, her behaviors mimicked an emotional development that stopped at her teenage years, effectively placing a teenager in an adult body. Much of this would track with so many instances recorded in the book:
* An expectation of a "Happily Ever After" story of a Princess beloved by her Prince. Her reactions continually reflected a "It's not fair" attitude which could lead to grudging acceptance, but often resulted in a lashing out.
* On obsession with body image.
* A need to be accepted, respected and loved for who she was by everybody.
* An immediate empathy for worthy causes. Through the years, I've mentored many teenagers who were strongly passionate about "making things right" for people. I always found that to be a most endearing quality that we should continue to embrace as we enter adulthood.
* A vindictiveness toward those who wronged her.
* A "that couldn't happen to me" belief that caused her to ignore advice and led to critical errors in judgment, such as assuming that no one would ever listen in (and record) her mobile telephone calls.
* An extreme fondness for practical jokes, and a tendency to giggle when it wouldn't be expected.
* Wanting to shine on the world stage, but experiencing a lot of self-doubts and a need for such occasions to be "error free."
I could go on. Many of us have these same feelings and worries. But, we also learn to cope with them. For her, they were often fresh wounds every time they occurred.
That would also explain much of the exasperation of Prince Charles. He was not subject to such emotional displays in the presence of others. It also partially explains his seeking more intellectual company that was more on his wavelength.
Of course, what it doesn't excuse is his marrying Diana with the concerns that he had to have noted. And when he did marry her, his demeaning attitude toward her was unforgivable. Yes, we all have our "snarky" moments, but his were continual where Diana was concerned. Surely, he could not have expected that she would passively condone a "royal prerogative" to have both a wife and a mistress! She was embracing her "ideal," not seeking a position and then playing the expected role.
Regardless, Diana Spencer "would have been a handful" given the circumstances. This book provides plenty of examples without being overly judgmental. Finishing the book, though, I found that my ardor for her image had cooled. Being with someone subject to frequent mood swings is difficult even during the best of times ... let alone with the stakes are so high.
I "met" the writer, Ken Wharfe, during a 5-day Road Scholar seminar entitled, The Art Of The English Murder Mystery. With his Scotland Yard background (as a police officer, and later investigating Vice, Gaming and Drug offenses), his area of expertise for the gathering was the "police procedural" aspect of mystery novels. Wharfe had some fascinating encounters. He was one of the police officers on the rooftop of Apple Records when The Beatles gave their impromptu (and final) concert. He was involved in events leading to the apprehension of Scottish serial killer, Dennis Nilsen. And he later served as Personal Protection Officer for members of the Royal Family ... initially Princes Andrew and Harry, and then Princess Diana. All of that seems more than adequate for any one lifetime!
DIANA: CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET is filled with details and anecdotes about his time with the Royal Family. For much of it, the vignettes seem little more than "fill in the gap" material for Readers who have already devoured other books about Diana. Even so, sometimes the omissions are frustrating, such as a listing of general categories that are addressed during training as a Personal Protection Officer, and then pointing out that specific details are not allowed to be published. That makes sense, but still ....
However, in the final chapters, as the behaviors of the Princess become more erratic and secretive, my interest sharply peaked. This was fascinating insight from the perspective of a participant that I had known very little about before. Although he had left Diana prior to her death, he does offer his analysis of how her security had been wanting, almost predicting a tragic conclusion.
I mentioned at the beginning of my comments that this book has ended my fascination with Diana. Although the writer does not offer a medical opinion regarding her temperamental mood swings, he does debunk suggestions of madness or that she was delusional.
However, from his descriptions, it would seem to me (as an admitted layman) that the Princess showed signs of what I would call "arrested development." Specifically, her behaviors mimicked an emotional development that stopped at her teenage years, effectively placing a teenager in an adult body. Much of this would track with so many instances recorded in the book:
* An expectation of a "Happily Ever After" story of a Princess beloved by her Prince. Her reactions continually reflected a "It's not fair" attitude which could lead to grudging acceptance, but often resulted in a lashing out.
* On obsession with body image.
* A need to be accepted, respected and loved for who she was by everybody.
* An immediate empathy for worthy causes. Through the years, I've mentored many teenagers who were strongly passionate about "making things right" for people. I always found that to be a most endearing quality that we should continue to embrace as we enter adulthood.
* A vindictiveness toward those who wronged her.
* A "that couldn't happen to me" belief that caused her to ignore advice and led to critical errors in judgment, such as assuming that no one would ever listen in (and record) her mobile telephone calls.
* An extreme fondness for practical jokes, and a tendency to giggle when it wouldn't be expected.
* Wanting to shine on the world stage, but experiencing a lot of self-doubts and a need for such occasions to be "error free."
I could go on. Many of us have these same feelings and worries. But, we also learn to cope with them. For her, they were often fresh wounds every time they occurred.
That would also explain much of the exasperation of Prince Charles. He was not subject to such emotional displays in the presence of others. It also partially explains his seeking more intellectual company that was more on his wavelength.
Of course, what it doesn't excuse is his marrying Diana with the concerns that he had to have noted. And when he did marry her, his demeaning attitude toward her was unforgivable. Yes, we all have our "snarky" moments, but his were continual where Diana was concerned. Surely, he could not have expected that she would passively condone a "royal prerogative" to have both a wife and a mistress! She was embracing her "ideal," not seeking a position and then playing the expected role.
Regardless, Diana Spencer "would have been a handful" given the circumstances. This book provides plenty of examples without being overly judgmental. Finishing the book, though, I found that my ardor for her image had cooled. Being with someone subject to frequent mood swings is difficult even during the best of times ... let alone with the stakes are so high.
September 21, 2017
This is a book that does not require two months to read, it is just that I would read a bit and move on to another more compelling book then go back when I was interested. The book was originally published in 2002 when most of the world was still firmly Team Diana. as her personal protection office Mr. Wharfe was witness to tantrums, misbehavior, high spirits and the depths of depression. He tries to wrap these in a nice package but as a grownup I am pretty much ready to give him a medal for tolerance.
Whether intentional or not he paints the late Princess as the 'poor little rich girl', she is tortured by the press while on an private island holiday, while skiing at an exclusive Austrian resort, while spending a spa weekend, while shopping in Paris.
He doesn't malign her, he offers lots of praise and complements for her work with the poor and sick. Her introducing her sons to the 'real world' and her kindness, often in private.
he never witnessed any true affection between her and her HRH hubby, but he didn't start working for her until after 1985.
I don't think this breaks any new ground in Diana lore.
Whether intentional or not he paints the late Princess as the 'poor little rich girl', she is tortured by the press while on an private island holiday, while skiing at an exclusive Austrian resort, while spending a spa weekend, while shopping in Paris.
He doesn't malign her, he offers lots of praise and complements for her work with the poor and sick. Her introducing her sons to the 'real world' and her kindness, often in private.
he never witnessed any true affection between her and her HRH hubby, but he didn't start working for her until after 1985.
I don't think this breaks any new ground in Diana lore.
December 31, 2012
5 Stars. Extremely well written and honest account of the late Princess of Wales and of Detective/Inspector Wharfe's time protecting both her and the Princes William and Harry (when they were children). I have read many books about her, and this is most definitely one of the best. He didn't paint Diana as a saint, however, neither did he viciously malign her as so many others have done. It also didn't veer into fantasy land, as some other accounts have. This is a man who truly was with Diana nearly 100% of the time and believed in both her, as well as her work. He did his very best to protect her (and the boys) which was his main responsibility, but was also a valuable friend and support for the Princess. Wharfe's compassion for the Princess as a person and understanding all of the struggles that she went through shone throughout the book. Rather than paint her as a "mad cow" as others have done, he writes compassionately, sympathetically and reiterates the stress that the Princess had to experience in her day-to-day life.
It truly was unfortunate that their working relationship had to end (as seems to be the case during the early 90's with many of her staff and friends) and I think, (as with others that either left on their own accord, or were cast aside), that Diana truly lost a valuable ally and friend, as well as a pillar of strength, and someone who had a hearty dose of common sense - all things that she really needed during her venture into her new life as Diana, Princess of Wales.
I know there was quite some fuss in the press when this book came out, but to be honest, it is certainly one of the nicer accounts about Diana - especially after having just finished reading "Shadows of a Princess" by her former private secretary, Patrick Jephson - an account which was tinged with bitterness, cynicism and the tone was at times, positively nauseating. I see no bitterness in this book, only a straightforward account of events, written cleanly (and humbly), which was not only very interesting to read, but also amusing at times.
I'd actually recommend reading this book after you've read as many of the other Diana books available, as it allows you an opportunity to compare accounts of the same events from different perspectives, and gives you a pretty good idea of which books were more fact than fiction, and vice versa. On several occasions, I found myself recalling something from another book, and would either see it confirmed by Wharfe, or at times, completely de-bunked.
It truly was unfortunate that their working relationship had to end (as seems to be the case during the early 90's with many of her staff and friends) and I think, (as with others that either left on their own accord, or were cast aside), that Diana truly lost a valuable ally and friend, as well as a pillar of strength, and someone who had a hearty dose of common sense - all things that she really needed during her venture into her new life as Diana, Princess of Wales.
I know there was quite some fuss in the press when this book came out, but to be honest, it is certainly one of the nicer accounts about Diana - especially after having just finished reading "Shadows of a Princess" by her former private secretary, Patrick Jephson - an account which was tinged with bitterness, cynicism and the tone was at times, positively nauseating. I see no bitterness in this book, only a straightforward account of events, written cleanly (and humbly), which was not only very interesting to read, but also amusing at times.
I'd actually recommend reading this book after you've read as many of the other Diana books available, as it allows you an opportunity to compare accounts of the same events from different perspectives, and gives you a pretty good idea of which books were more fact than fiction, and vice versa. On several occasions, I found myself recalling something from another book, and would either see it confirmed by Wharfe, or at times, completely de-bunked.
June 26, 2017
Although it was not bad, I'm surprised that people seem to think that this book is great. Ken Wharfe was Diana's Scotland Yard PPO (personal protection officer) for 6 years, and he did have the privilege of an insider that is why I was enthusiastic about the book. However, I was let down multiple times. Ken is pretty much absorbed by himself, he takes every event and manages to make it about him. Although, his admiration of Diana is clear but he doesn't seem to like her due to many reasons and throughout the book I felt he was somewhat judgemental, and he really minimizes her role as merely a woman who is interested in charity and vindictive towards her husband. But what turned me off the most is that he repeatedly defends the media! The last chapter he appears to be blaming the victim(s) for the cause of death. Ken says that Diana and Dodi should've gave the paparazzi their desired photos to prevent being chased to death by them,...excuse me, what the F? FYI, he repeatedly mentions that the media were always fair to him hence why he defends them. Put in mind that Ken indirectly defends the establishment and denies any wrong doing in their part and he rules her murder as a merely a tragic accident which could've been avoided if Diana were a good girl who obeyed rules, knew her place and did not runaway from the paparazzi who were only doing their job.
I can't say that I hated the book because there are some certain anecdotes which I enjoyed, and it did give me a few interesting information but overall it doesn't really do Diana's story its justice. It's lacking and purposely shows Diana in a specific biased light that certainly appeals to the establishment and the media. I just couldn't trust Ken.
I can't say that I hated the book because there are some certain anecdotes which I enjoyed, and it did give me a few interesting information but overall it doesn't really do Diana's story its justice. It's lacking and purposely shows Diana in a specific biased light that certainly appeals to the establishment and the media. I just couldn't trust Ken.
August 9, 2017
Diana: Closely Guarded Secret by Inspector Ken Wharfe with Robert Jobson details Inspector Wharfe's job as Princess Diana's protection officer from 1988--1993. The book explains how the Inspector did his job as the Princess's police bodyguard. I found it quite interesting, and what was refreshing is the book is factual and not just someone who was close to Diana and wished to grab some money by writing what he knew about Diana and her life during those six years. And what six years those were.
Diana's marriage was falling apart, her husband, Prince Charles was constantly seeing his mistress, Camilla Parker-Bowles, the Princess' affair with James Hewitt, The British Royal Family versus Diana and vice versa, the Princess as a world figure, Diana's children, The Princes William and Harry, and the list goes on. Being a police protection officer (PPO) entailed a great deal. Much of his job I was unaware of and reading about it, I truly did find it fascinating. All that he had to do such as attending a wedding or funeral or even an art exhibit,the Inspector had "blend in". Thus,he had to have all the correct clothes. Plus, there was much he needed to do ahead to ensure Diana's safety. His final chapter discussed her death and what he felt should have been done but was not. He outlined what he thought should have been done or what would have been done if Scotland Yard, his boss, had been involved. The Inspector wanted to tell his side of those six years and give his opinion of August 31, 1997, the night Diana died. No gossip! No spilling of secrets. He felt "I owe it to her". I believe that he did what he set out to do.
Diana's marriage was falling apart, her husband, Prince Charles was constantly seeing his mistress, Camilla Parker-Bowles, the Princess' affair with James Hewitt, The British Royal Family versus Diana and vice versa, the Princess as a world figure, Diana's children, The Princes William and Harry, and the list goes on. Being a police protection officer (PPO) entailed a great deal. Much of his job I was unaware of and reading about it, I truly did find it fascinating. All that he had to do such as attending a wedding or funeral or even an art exhibit,the Inspector had "blend in". Thus,he had to have all the correct clothes. Plus, there was much he needed to do ahead to ensure Diana's safety. His final chapter discussed her death and what he felt should have been done but was not. He outlined what he thought should have been done or what would have been done if Scotland Yard, his boss, had been involved. The Inspector wanted to tell his side of those six years and give his opinion of August 31, 1997, the night Diana died. No gossip! No spilling of secrets. He felt "I owe it to her". I believe that he did what he set out to do.
December 17, 2021
This was a Kindle unlimited selection. I admired Diana for her compassion, vulnerability and willingness to connect with people that were suffering. This account by her protection officer was not amazing, saying that is kind. The book opens with his disclaimer that he is only writing because he wants to set the record straight and write about the Diana he knew. I am sure he knew all aspects of her life, as someone with such intimate aspect. Too bad he is a person with poor insight and a tendency to gossip.
If Ken Wharfe was a friend of mine, I expect over time I would not want to have conversation with him because he was a clunky, insensitive, schoolboy set in a glamorous role in proximity to a woman of rare make-up.
He objectified Diana, he had gross gossip about her extra marital relationships. He judged that she held a double standard for calling her husband a cheat when she was a cheat. Provoking.
I don't think it's wrong to say "Charles started it" At some point, if someone says "you have to stay married" and you are a loving person that longs for closeness then the fact that she chose to find a loving relationship is not the same as what he did, wanting his cake of a 19 year old bride and his yukky married girlfriend who was too gutless to shake him off.
It is medieval to presume an "open marriage" because you are a prince, absolutely head scratching after wooing someone in public and inviting the planet to your wedding knowing all the while you are not committed.
Too bad the person Charles married had unbelievable charisma and she ate him alive when a camera was around. I am sure he would rather she was quiet Joan Kennedy who just stayed home and played the piano and drank and looked beautiful in family photos. I'm showing my age talking about Joan Kennedy.
Okay, back to the book. Ken Wharfe related valuable insight so that I'm given access to the real Diana that one time her towel fell off around him, sometimes he could hear her having relations in bed and when she woke up in the morning she looked like she had a busy night.
Eww. Gross.
I didn't ACTUALLY finish this book, after just one too many remarks about her sex life, I was finished with the book and I wrote this to warn you off. I read every Diana book that comes out, they are mostly the same, this one stinks. It is the bottom of the barrel. Reread one you read before Ken Wharfe is a gross old man and his point of view is cringeworthy.
If Ken Wharfe was a friend of mine, I expect over time I would not want to have conversation with him because he was a clunky, insensitive, schoolboy set in a glamorous role in proximity to a woman of rare make-up.
He objectified Diana, he had gross gossip about her extra marital relationships. He judged that she held a double standard for calling her husband a cheat when she was a cheat. Provoking.
I don't think it's wrong to say "Charles started it" At some point, if someone says "you have to stay married" and you are a loving person that longs for closeness then the fact that she chose to find a loving relationship is not the same as what he did, wanting his cake of a 19 year old bride and his yukky married girlfriend who was too gutless to shake him off.
It is medieval to presume an "open marriage" because you are a prince, absolutely head scratching after wooing someone in public and inviting the planet to your wedding knowing all the while you are not committed.
Too bad the person Charles married had unbelievable charisma and she ate him alive when a camera was around. I am sure he would rather she was quiet Joan Kennedy who just stayed home and played the piano and drank and looked beautiful in family photos. I'm showing my age talking about Joan Kennedy.
Okay, back to the book. Ken Wharfe related valuable insight so that I'm given access to the real Diana that one time her towel fell off around him, sometimes he could hear her having relations in bed and when she woke up in the morning she looked like she had a busy night.
Eww. Gross.
I didn't ACTUALLY finish this book, after just one too many remarks about her sex life, I was finished with the book and I wrote this to warn you off. I read every Diana book that comes out, they are mostly the same, this one stinks. It is the bottom of the barrel. Reread one you read before Ken Wharfe is a gross old man and his point of view is cringeworthy.
April 28, 2023
What a wild ride through a glimpse into the life of Princess Di!
So glad to know she was human just like the rest of us. Just makes me wonder....How would things be if people took mental health as seriously then as they do now? Also, reading this makes me wonder about who's controlling the narrative for the Netflix series "The Crown" 🤔
All in all, this was a fantastic glimpse into the life of such an inspirational lady.
10/10 would recommend to anyone interested in knowing the PPO's side if the story and a rare view from someone who didn't see her as an embarrassment to the Royal Family. But also Wharfe, is very blunt in stating that she could be unreasonable at times, plainly stating that she is human like the rest of us, only having to live in the limelight.
So glad to know she was human just like the rest of us. Just makes me wonder....How would things be if people took mental health as seriously then as they do now? Also, reading this makes me wonder about who's controlling the narrative for the Netflix series "The Crown" 🤔
All in all, this was a fantastic glimpse into the life of such an inspirational lady.
10/10 would recommend to anyone interested in knowing the PPO's side if the story and a rare view from someone who didn't see her as an embarrassment to the Royal Family. But also Wharfe, is very blunt in stating that she could be unreasonable at times, plainly stating that she is human like the rest of us, only having to live in the limelight.
December 23, 2017
This is a good addition to the books written about Diana since her death. It provides a balanced view of the princess during the years Ken Wharfe worked in her security detail. He focuses on those years, and does not attempt to make excuses for Diana's sometimes erratic behavior. Wharfe also offers an interesting analysis of the security issues (related by Trevor Rees-Jones in his book "The Bodyguard's Story") that led to Diana's fatal car accident.
October 7, 2018
Made me see the Princess in a more human and positive way than I had before. A good and interesting read.
November 10, 2021
This book is very in favor of Diana, understandably cause it's written by her protection officer, but it's so cringe every time the author writes about a new lover Diana had (married or not), while he also point out her hypocrisy, he adds each time it's only because Charles didn't want her that she started looking elsewhere, as if it justify her having affairs with multiple married men.
For me, the most shocking information I got from this book is the part about Diana's satisfaction from fantasizing the death of the Queen Mother, what sane and Kind-hearted person does that? It's also quite disturbing that the author suggests Diana had the last word on the queen mother, cause her funeral was more successful than queen mother's, WTH am I reading?
I'm having a hard time believing that a woman having satisfaction from pushing her stepmother down the stairs and fantasizing the death of an elderly women could be a real humanitarian of any kind. No wonder the royal family was indifferent towards her when she was alive, what a vile and spiteful human being she was. How can one truly care about the suffering of strangers, when she/he is capable of such cruelty towards people that are close to them.
Conclusion, from all the books I've read about her, Diana really wasn't the saint she liked everyone to think of her, people's princess she certainlly wasn't, in fact few people in life act as nasty and spoilt as Diana had in her short life. Strangely, she's still regarded as some sort of goddess for millions despite her many major flaws, but I do wonder had she not been pretty and slim, and without her self-victimization, her name might long be forgotten.
For me, the most shocking information I got from this book is the part about Diana's satisfaction from fantasizing the death of the Queen Mother, what sane and Kind-hearted person does that? It's also quite disturbing that the author suggests Diana had the last word on the queen mother, cause her funeral was more successful than queen mother's, WTH am I reading?
I'm having a hard time believing that a woman having satisfaction from pushing her stepmother down the stairs and fantasizing the death of an elderly women could be a real humanitarian of any kind. No wonder the royal family was indifferent towards her when she was alive, what a vile and spiteful human being she was. How can one truly care about the suffering of strangers, when she/he is capable of such cruelty towards people that are close to them.
Conclusion, from all the books I've read about her, Diana really wasn't the saint she liked everyone to think of her, people's princess she certainlly wasn't, in fact few people in life act as nasty and spoilt as Diana had in her short life. Strangely, she's still regarded as some sort of goddess for millions despite her many major flaws, but I do wonder had she not been pretty and slim, and without her self-victimization, her name might long be forgotten.
October 16, 2015
One man's attempt on the world record for mentioning his own name the most times in one publication. Drove me barmy and detracted from an otherwise interesting read.
September 2, 2016
A Waste of time.
This is a very disappointing read from an author who is focused on himself. The author seems to have a need to make everything about him.
This is a very disappointing read from an author who is focused on himself. The author seems to have a need to make everything about him.
January 11, 2024
I listened to this as an audiobook on Spotify.
It really bugs me how many people have written books on Diana after her death, and adopted a sanctimonious stance insisting they are doing it to protect her "memory." Utter bullsh*t. Mr Wharfe clearly loved bigging himself up as a brilliant bodyguard who would have kept Diana alive should he not have left her service months before her tragic death. It's nothing more than a cash grab and an ego boost. Note that he wrote a pithy follow-up book about guarding Diana on overseas trips. That should tell you all you need to know.
The book is vaguely interesting, but perhaps reading it decades after it was written meant most of the information was already in the public domain. I cannot see how gossiping about her love affairs shows respect for her either. The truth is, being a Royal bodyguard is a hard job, but it has loads of perks. You get to travel the world and have access to the upper echelons of society. Shame on him for selling out Diana. I didn't find his tidbits particular interesting either. In reality, I thought he could have done more to empathise with her. Imagine having a bodyguard watching and following you 24/7. Nightmare! The story he tells about her escaping a holiday home by jumping out of a window into a soft pile of snow felt controlling. He berates her, insisting she could have injured herself or landed on a rock. She was a f*kin' adult! I'm sure she assessed the risk. No wonder Diana felt trapped. She was treated like an infant. Even cats and dogs jump in soft snow. Bloody hell. I can't imagine how hellish her life was.
Also, the story about her driving to buy CDs and Mr Wharfe berating her about parking on a double yellow line left me shocked. As he was narrating the audiobook, it was clear he wasn't impressed, and he told her off like a child. Surprised she didn't throw him out of the car and let him walk back to the Palace.
At the end of the day, it's impossible to really understand what Diana went through unless you are part of the Royal Family living in the gilded cage. Perhaps, Prince William would be able to tell her story the best. But I believe he's the one person who truly loves his mother, and as he tried to protect her in life, he will also protect her in death and never exploit her memory. Unlike Harry, Meghan, Burrell and the rest of the despicable lot.
I am also aware I'm partly a hypocrite as these books wouldn't be written unless there is an audience for them. My defence is that I read them years after they are published and I never purchase, I only borrow from the library or listen on a free subscription!
ADDITION: The best part of the book was Mr Wharfe's observations and opinion on Burrell. He thought he was a dodgy weirdo whose days were numbered and would have been fired by Diana should she not have passed away prematurely.
It really bugs me how many people have written books on Diana after her death, and adopted a sanctimonious stance insisting they are doing it to protect her "memory." Utter bullsh*t. Mr Wharfe clearly loved bigging himself up as a brilliant bodyguard who would have kept Diana alive should he not have left her service months before her tragic death. It's nothing more than a cash grab and an ego boost. Note that he wrote a pithy follow-up book about guarding Diana on overseas trips. That should tell you all you need to know.
The book is vaguely interesting, but perhaps reading it decades after it was written meant most of the information was already in the public domain. I cannot see how gossiping about her love affairs shows respect for her either. The truth is, being a Royal bodyguard is a hard job, but it has loads of perks. You get to travel the world and have access to the upper echelons of society. Shame on him for selling out Diana. I didn't find his tidbits particular interesting either. In reality, I thought he could have done more to empathise with her. Imagine having a bodyguard watching and following you 24/7. Nightmare! The story he tells about her escaping a holiday home by jumping out of a window into a soft pile of snow felt controlling. He berates her, insisting she could have injured herself or landed on a rock. She was a f*kin' adult! I'm sure she assessed the risk. No wonder Diana felt trapped. She was treated like an infant. Even cats and dogs jump in soft snow. Bloody hell. I can't imagine how hellish her life was.
Also, the story about her driving to buy CDs and Mr Wharfe berating her about parking on a double yellow line left me shocked. As he was narrating the audiobook, it was clear he wasn't impressed, and he told her off like a child. Surprised she didn't throw him out of the car and let him walk back to the Palace.
At the end of the day, it's impossible to really understand what Diana went through unless you are part of the Royal Family living in the gilded cage. Perhaps, Prince William would be able to tell her story the best. But I believe he's the one person who truly loves his mother, and as he tried to protect her in life, he will also protect her in death and never exploit her memory. Unlike Harry, Meghan, Burrell and the rest of the despicable lot.
I am also aware I'm partly a hypocrite as these books wouldn't be written unless there is an audience for them. My defence is that I read them years after they are published and I never purchase, I only borrow from the library or listen on a free subscription!
ADDITION: The best part of the book was Mr Wharfe's observations and opinion on Burrell. He thought he was a dodgy weirdo whose days were numbered and would have been fired by Diana should she not have passed away prematurely.
November 22, 2017
"I just hope that people will remember her as she was at her best, a warm-hearted and fun-loving woman who, as she wished, really did make a difference. It is probably a vain hope, but I owe it to her."
These are the last sentences of the book, and they seem to be a direct contradiction to what the entire book was about. If this was the intention, then why was there 5 criticisms for every compliment about Princess Di? I do not view the princess as this wonderfully perfect person, but it did feel tacky that he was saying the things he was when she is no longer here to defend herself. Maybe if it didn't feel like a vendetta given the nature of his resignation as PPO, or even a justification for the guilt he seemed to have over her death, then I wouldn't see this book as such an unfair and lop-sided portrayal.
Also, I was rather bored reading this book. Some of the stories were interesting, but now I am left wondering how accurate they are. One of the biggest criticisms I have of this book is that Mr. Wharfe somehow re-frames every story to be about himself and his overly-sensitive ego. This made the book very repetitive (boring) because he viewed almost every scenario in the exact same way- Diana was ridiculous and he responded with perfect finesse.
All in all, I don't think he delivered what he had hoped to in the end.
These are the last sentences of the book, and they seem to be a direct contradiction to what the entire book was about. If this was the intention, then why was there 5 criticisms for every compliment about Princess Di? I do not view the princess as this wonderfully perfect person, but it did feel tacky that he was saying the things he was when she is no longer here to defend herself. Maybe if it didn't feel like a vendetta given the nature of his resignation as PPO, or even a justification for the guilt he seemed to have over her death, then I wouldn't see this book as such an unfair and lop-sided portrayal.
Also, I was rather bored reading this book. Some of the stories were interesting, but now I am left wondering how accurate they are. One of the biggest criticisms I have of this book is that Mr. Wharfe somehow re-frames every story to be about himself and his overly-sensitive ego. This made the book very repetitive (boring) because he viewed almost every scenario in the exact same way- Diana was ridiculous and he responded with perfect finesse.
All in all, I don't think he delivered what he had hoped to in the end.
September 25, 2021
Some further details not yet detailed regarding "our" Princess Diana.
Ken Warfe, was certainly in a position to reveal a few more personal details relating to his daily contact with the Princess, as her personal Royal Police Protection Officer. Mr Warfe garnered a close friendship with Diana during the years he served as her body guard and also watched over her young sons, when their own Protection team was not present. Warfe writes an honest assessment of his "principle" (as he refers to the Princess), as much as he could, without betraying his "nondisclosure agreement", that was undoubtedly required of him in such a close position to the royal family.
However, I found it an interesting read with good insight into Diana's murcurial
personality!
I did find some of his point of view a bit self-serving and aggrandizing, as though he and he alone, had the capacity to cajole and placate Diana's mood swings for the better of everyone, especially, the Princess! Which may have been true but it's a theme that runs throughout the book. I did like his professional opinion relating to the car accident that unfortunately took her life. I do agree with his assessment of the tragic accident, and how it could have been prevented; however, as they say, " hindsight is 20/20"!!!
Ken Warfe, was certainly in a position to reveal a few more personal details relating to his daily contact with the Princess, as her personal Royal Police Protection Officer. Mr Warfe garnered a close friendship with Diana during the years he served as her body guard and also watched over her young sons, when their own Protection team was not present. Warfe writes an honest assessment of his "principle" (as he refers to the Princess), as much as he could, without betraying his "nondisclosure agreement", that was undoubtedly required of him in such a close position to the royal family.
However, I found it an interesting read with good insight into Diana's murcurial
personality!
I did find some of his point of view a bit self-serving and aggrandizing, as though he and he alone, had the capacity to cajole and placate Diana's mood swings for the better of everyone, especially, the Princess! Which may have been true but it's a theme that runs throughout the book. I did like his professional opinion relating to the car accident that unfortunately took her life. I do agree with his assessment of the tragic accident, and how it could have been prevented; however, as they say, " hindsight is 20/20"!!!
July 21, 2017
This book, written by her security officer, provides an interesting perspective on the life of Princess Diana. There had to be mutual trust and respect between both parties if Wharfe was to do his job effectively. Wharfe, therefore, has been privy to much of the detail leading up to her divorce from Prince Charles and her eventual tragic death. Written post her demise and probably in contravention of any contractual agreement re confidentiality, the author does paint a sympathetic portrait of one of the most famous women in the world, even if it reveals her ability sometimes to effectively manipulate those in her immediate entourage.
What I found interesting is that although we get an intimate portrait painted of a princess, we are left with little knowledge about the author himself. This I find strange in view of the need for a close professional relationship between the two of them. I wonder if this is his SAS background that demands the job be done almost anonymously and without fanfare.
This is not normally my choice of reading material. I bought it in a second-hand bookstore in the southern U.S. It was being offered as a package along with a "Diana" doll. The latter, I returned to the store to dispose of however they might wish.
What I found interesting is that although we get an intimate portrait painted of a princess, we are left with little knowledge about the author himself. This I find strange in view of the need for a close professional relationship between the two of them. I wonder if this is his SAS background that demands the job be done almost anonymously and without fanfare.
This is not normally my choice of reading material. I bought it in a second-hand bookstore in the southern U.S. It was being offered as a package along with a "Diana" doll. The latter, I returned to the store to dispose of however they might wish.
December 5, 2020
This book was written by Ken Wharfe, Scotland Yard, who was for six years the personal protection officer for Diana, Princess of Wales. He has intimate acknowledge of her goings about and her personality. I never was a big Diana watcher, but I would think this book didn't bring many situations light much that hasn't been brought out before. However, it was intimate details that brought personality to this book. He saw her at her most guard moments and sometimes it was ugly and sometimes it was beautiful. Ken was the ultimate intermediary between Diana and the press and Diane and others around her. She truly wanted to do good, but had serious flaws, too. It is unbelievable the behind the scenes postering it takes for anything involving the Royal family.
I think the most interesting part to me was surrounding Diana's death. When she left the Royal family, she was offered protection by Scotland Yard, which she refused. So Ken goes through the last few hours of her life, and how it would have been treated if she would have had Scotland Yard's protection. How her death was a series of security mistakes that someone in high profile doesn't even think about. And it shows how people of wealth truly cannot understand the implications of their actions.
I think the most interesting part to me was surrounding Diana's death. When she left the Royal family, she was offered protection by Scotland Yard, which she refused. So Ken goes through the last few hours of her life, and how it would have been treated if she would have had Scotland Yard's protection. How her death was a series of security mistakes that someone in high profile doesn't even think about. And it shows how people of wealth truly cannot understand the implications of their actions.
August 7, 2017
Lovely book!
I have read many accounts of Diana's life and yet never got as much insight into her personality as in this one. She was fun loving and funny, a caring mother, a humanitarian at heart and an astute judge of her publicity value to her various causes. Ken Warfe, I think, presented a fair, dispassionate and telling story of his five years as her head of security. There are a few warts mentioned but mainly what shines through is their genuine friendship. He was part of the family, playing with the boys, laughing and joking and at the same time, very devoted to the children's and her safety. I don't agree with many reviewers that he injected his own ego overly much into the story. He was placing his role in context with the job at hand and explaining how certain decisions, reconnaissance and negotiations with the press were made. His place in the history was important and necessarily included therefore. It was interesting and very professionally done. I loved the humor in the book, especially the "gadget" story. A well written memoir. Thank you to the authors.
I have read many accounts of Diana's life and yet never got as much insight into her personality as in this one. She was fun loving and funny, a caring mother, a humanitarian at heart and an astute judge of her publicity value to her various causes. Ken Warfe, I think, presented a fair, dispassionate and telling story of his five years as her head of security. There are a few warts mentioned but mainly what shines through is their genuine friendship. He was part of the family, playing with the boys, laughing and joking and at the same time, very devoted to the children's and her safety. I don't agree with many reviewers that he injected his own ego overly much into the story. He was placing his role in context with the job at hand and explaining how certain decisions, reconnaissance and negotiations with the press were made. His place in the history was important and necessarily included therefore. It was interesting and very professionally done. I loved the humor in the book, especially the "gadget" story. A well written memoir. Thank you to the authors.
April 8, 2018
This book is written by Inspector Ken Wharfe with Robert Jobson. Ken Wharfe had been the personal protection officer of Princess Diana for almost six years from 1988 to 1993. He has been not only her police officer but also a trusted aide and confidant. Through this book, he shared his numerous personal experiences and the marital rift between Princess Diana and her husband Prince Charles. However, I am not an admirer of such personal disharmonious relationship for entertainment purpose. On the bright side, Princess Diana was a responsible mother to her sons William and Harry and had a great spirit of altruistic desire to help less fortunate people.
Author’s has written this book from an unbiased point of view. He projected some of the Princesses Diana’s weaknesses which were partly responsible for her separation from Prince Charles and also a reason for her untimely demise. In the last chapter of the book, Author has explained various logical explanations behind the fatal car accident in Paris which resulted in Princess’s Death.
Author’s has written this book from an unbiased point of view. He projected some of the Princesses Diana’s weaknesses which were partly responsible for her separation from Prince Charles and also a reason for her untimely demise. In the last chapter of the book, Author has explained various logical explanations behind the fatal car accident in Paris which resulted in Princess’s Death.
September 3, 2021
I have read several books about Diana, Princess of Wales and I think this is one of the best. The author writes of what it was like to protect the princess on her excursions at home and abroad. He seems to have had a good relationship with Diana and her boys. He offers a balanced view of The Princess and he is fair in his observations of her behaviour and does not sugar coat them. We see both sides of her personality, the positive and negative. He also provides a balanced view of Charles, Prince of Wales and shows us how Charles could be both mean-spirited yet sometimes be kinds toward her.
At the end of the book, he explains how Diana's death was a tragic accident and may have been prevented if she would have accepted the security that was offered by the palace on her divorce. She did not accept that protective security offered to her by the Queen because of her feelings of suspicion and dislike toward the royal family. If only she had worn her seatbelt that fateful August night!
At the end of the book, he explains how Diana's death was a tragic accident and may have been prevented if she would have accepted the security that was offered by the palace on her divorce. She did not accept that protective security offered to her by the Queen because of her feelings of suspicion and dislike toward the royal family. If only she had worn her seatbelt that fateful August night!
December 14, 2022
Diana as he knew her.. See
An easy to read book that gives a probably true and fair insight to the life of the princess during the time that Ken Wharfe was her protection officer. There is no 'gossip' but a few stories that probably many of us haven't heard before.
There is no name dropping or dozens of names cropping up that make it hard to remember who is who without flicking back a few pages to refresh the memory.
I think he was genuinely fond of Diana but only as far as his position allowed him to go. It would not be possible to spend so long with someone and be privy to many of their secrets as Ken was at times not to have some affection for them and not necessarily in a romantic way.
Diana is shown to be a complicated lady, often at odds with herself, confused and confusing. So sad often were the last year's of her life. We should all now let her rest in peace.
An easy to read book that gives a probably true and fair insight to the life of the princess during the time that Ken Wharfe was her protection officer. There is no 'gossip' but a few stories that probably many of us haven't heard before.
There is no name dropping or dozens of names cropping up that make it hard to remember who is who without flicking back a few pages to refresh the memory.
I think he was genuinely fond of Diana but only as far as his position allowed him to go. It would not be possible to spend so long with someone and be privy to many of their secrets as Ken was at times not to have some affection for them and not necessarily in a romantic way.
Diana is shown to be a complicated lady, often at odds with herself, confused and confusing. So sad often were the last year's of her life. We should all now let her rest in peace.
January 10, 2024
I read this book after having read Trevor Rees-Jones' memoir. I wanted to know more about how Diana was protected since Rees-Jones practically admitted that through neglect, obliviousness, and fear of losing his job, he contributed to her death. Ken Wharfe protected her beautifully, which makes her death all the more tragic.
The prelude to the book made me almost as sad as I was when I watched the funeral so long ago and the description of the years when Wharfe was her protection officer brought her alive like no other book I've read about her. He showed the many facets of her dark side - the moodiness, manipulation, instability, and immaturity. He also made clear the many good things about Diana like her gift for making people feel special, her charm, her optimism, her sincere desire to do good.
Even though I found the book ultimately heartbreaking, I would recommend it highly to anyone interested in Diana. It was a fascinating read.
The prelude to the book made me almost as sad as I was when I watched the funeral so long ago and the description of the years when Wharfe was her protection officer brought her alive like no other book I've read about her. He showed the many facets of her dark side - the moodiness, manipulation, instability, and immaturity. He also made clear the many good things about Diana like her gift for making people feel special, her charm, her optimism, her sincere desire to do good.
Even though I found the book ultimately heartbreaking, I would recommend it highly to anyone interested in Diana. It was a fascinating read.
August 2, 2017
I thought I had read everything there is on this subject. There is material in this book I have never heard about before. I imagine some of the people mentioned feel very betrayed by this book. I believe it is the first time a royal security officer has talked to the public about private incidents.
I think the author tried be very hard to be balanced but, his praise of Prince Charles is faint. Despite many issues with Diana, he seems to still be her supporter. He dispels the popular idea that Diana and her Mother had a poor relationship. He says they were very close and spent lots of time together. He says that William and Harry loved Diana's Mother and saw her often.
If you are interested in this subject, this is worth your time for the further insights it offers.
I think the author tried be very hard to be balanced but, his praise of Prince Charles is faint. Despite many issues with Diana, he seems to still be her supporter. He dispels the popular idea that Diana and her Mother had a poor relationship. He says they were very close and spent lots of time together. He says that William and Harry loved Diana's Mother and saw her often.
If you are interested in this subject, this is worth your time for the further insights it offers.
August 7, 2017
Very Good
I really enjoyed this book. Mr. Wharfe lays out a story of his time protecting Princess Diana. It seems to me to be very truthful. I've read many books about the princess, but found this to be believable from someone who was not a relative or member of the royal family. Mr. Whafe was obviously fond of the princess but was realistic in dealing with her. His views on the death of the princess are also very realistic. They aren't far fetched or looking for secret agents hired to kill. I hope you enjoy this book and see that everyone is still just human after all. Happy Reading.
I really enjoyed this book. Mr. Wharfe lays out a story of his time protecting Princess Diana. It seems to me to be very truthful. I've read many books about the princess, but found this to be believable from someone who was not a relative or member of the royal family. Mr. Whafe was obviously fond of the princess but was realistic in dealing with her. His views on the death of the princess are also very realistic. They aren't far fetched or looking for secret agents hired to kill. I hope you enjoy this book and see that everyone is still just human after all. Happy Reading.
August 2, 2017
I really liked the way Mr. Wharfe writes. Very easy to read and he made a subject I was not, at first, particularly interested about. We, as a planet, have been inundated with supposed 'first-hand' accounts of the enigmatic Princess Diana, and I chose this book thinking I would probably tire of it before I finished it. However, he seemed genuinely determined to give the reader a true picture of her, both nice and not so nice. I truly enjoyed reading it, and felt like I learned more about her than I had ever known before, and I still admire her!
October 28, 2017
I found this book most interesting covering what goes on behind the scenes for any Personal Police Protection Officer guarding his charge, especially the Princess of Wales. The training required and preparation before Diane went anywhere to ensure her safety is quite amazing. Her life was amazingly complex and difficult, despite her rich lifestyle and those she mixed with. Ken Wharfe was such a diplomatic, patient and tolerant man. I am convinced Diana would be alive today if he had been her PPO leading up to her death.
May 22, 2020
Truly unbiased and down to earth
This is an account of a truly devastating episode tha I found to be fair and well presented.
Ken Wharfs reporting of someone on the inside highlights the dangers of trying to manipulate the press in attempt to satisfy ones deep unhappy feelings.
When reading the book you can only feel the deepest sympathy for Diana and I’m more convinced that the feeling I had and still have about the other main character in the book are justified.
Thank you Ken for a gripping read.
Looby
This is an account of a truly devastating episode tha I found to be fair and well presented.
Ken Wharfs reporting of someone on the inside highlights the dangers of trying to manipulate the press in attempt to satisfy ones deep unhappy feelings.
When reading the book you can only feel the deepest sympathy for Diana and I’m more convinced that the feeling I had and still have about the other main character in the book are justified.
Thank you Ken for a gripping read.
Looby
August 4, 2020
Concise,clear,honest book
Having read a lot of books about Diana Princess of Wales,this seems to be the most honest biography I have read.
I was especially pleased to read the authors opinion of some of Paul Burrells accounts being brought to account as being untrue.I have long thought that a lot of his words and actions weren't correct or in Diana's best interest posthumously.
This is a true picture in my view,as Charles Earl Spencer famously said in his Eulogy,of a beautiful,complex,irreplaceable Diana.Would recommend to anyone who has an interest in the truth about Diana.
Having read a lot of books about Diana Princess of Wales,this seems to be the most honest biography I have read.
I was especially pleased to read the authors opinion of some of Paul Burrells accounts being brought to account as being untrue.I have long thought that a lot of his words and actions weren't correct or in Diana's best interest posthumously.
This is a true picture in my view,as Charles Earl Spencer famously said in his Eulogy,of a beautiful,complex,irreplaceable Diana.Would recommend to anyone who has an interest in the truth about Diana.
January 4, 2021
A true account from an honest insider.
I loved this honest account. Ken is a true in insider with no alternative motives. I read Paul Burrells book, and was constantly thinking is this man telling the truth or is he making up his own version. I didn't feel that with this book. I feel I now know more about the life Diana and what happened on the fateful night. Worth reading for facts, and personal insights from the man who without doubt was closet to Diana on the last years upto her death.
I loved this honest account. Ken is a true in insider with no alternative motives. I read Paul Burrells book, and was constantly thinking is this man telling the truth or is he making up his own version. I didn't feel that with this book. I feel I now know more about the life Diana and what happened on the fateful night. Worth reading for facts, and personal insights from the man who without doubt was closet to Diana on the last years upto her death.
December 11, 2022
Very Informative.
The author gives the reader a deep insight into what is required to maintain safety for a high profile person such as Diana.
The book is very well written; and Ken Wharfe provides a balanced assessment of all phases of the job and the Royal family.
The same holds true for his assessment of the event that lead to Diana’s death.
A very full and interesting book. I am not a follower of royalty, but this book jumped out at me as an interesting read. I am glad I made the purchase. Well worth it.
The author gives the reader a deep insight into what is required to maintain safety for a high profile person such as Diana.
The book is very well written; and Ken Wharfe provides a balanced assessment of all phases of the job and the Royal family.
The same holds true for his assessment of the event that lead to Diana’s death.
A very full and interesting book. I am not a follower of royalty, but this book jumped out at me as an interesting read. I am glad I made the purchase. Well worth it.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 103 reviews