Picked this up as a little bit of vacation PD because I'm looking for more ways into teaching writing and revising.
The individual mentor texts mentioned are, by and large, not appropriate in content or reading level for my students, and I'd have to think a little carefully about how to introduce (academically and culturally) some of the structures like Notebook Time. While I appreciate the mentor texts included, it's just as important to point out -- as the authors do -- that many of these texts have a short shelf life, so by the time you are reading through these mentor-mentor texts, their appeal will have waned.
Like many PD books, the authors' attempts at teaching transparency only serve to highlight just how much work goes on silently and behind the scenes. One of my biggest takeaways here was in a whisper from the authors: "If you want to teach the way we do, get ready to become obsessive about cultivating and reading a variety of texts and thinking deeply about each of those text's nuances so when one of your 100 students is interested in improving ONE small technique, you can pinpoint an example of that technique 'in the wild.'" Ack. Moar work, on top of the hundreds of children's books I'm already committing myself to reading every year so I can know them and recommend them.
However, this book gave me plenty to think about, including:
- the importance of introducing mentor texts at the beginning of a genre study and the importance of keeping the texts contemporary and refreshing them each year
- that teaching students to "read like writers" is a skill of its own
- instead of using daily measures of accountability in writers' workshop, using periodic measures of accountability in the form of process reflections. (their words: "checkpoints.") This way, we can open up the writers' workshop to be a little more organic while still keeping an eye on the class as a whole. Honestly I might photocopy pgs. 132-133 from this book and give it to everybody in my department at our next meeting.