RYRIE'S "POPULAR" SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY, REVISED
Charles Caldwell Ryrie (1925-2016) long served as professor of systematic theology at Dallas Theological Seminary; he was formerly a strong advocate of dispensationalism (which is not mentioned in this book at all), and is the editor of the Ryrie Study Bible, and author of books such as 'Dispensationalism Today' and 'The Basis of the Premillennial Faith.'
He wrote in the Introduction to this 1986 book (revised edition 1999), "if theology is thinking about God and expressing those thoughts, then judge this book on the basis of whether or not it reflects correct thoughts about God and expresses them accurately and plainly to you and in a manner that brings changes in your thinking and living."
Perhaps controversially, he states, "Can one be an evangelical and deny the full concept of inerrancy? The answer is yes, simply because some evangelicals do." (Pg. 87) He candidly admits, "Everybody wrestles with the relationship between the divine and the human authors of Scriptures." (Pg. 95) He also concedes, "We must acknowledge that nowhere in the Scriptures are demons directly said to be fallen angels, but the evidence just cited seems to point to the conclusion that they are." (Pg. 181)
He states solemnly, "We must not forget that the majority of people who have ever lived have rejected the revelation of God through nature... They have condemned themselves, and when God rejects them, He does so justly." (Pg. 38) Later, he argues, "people are foreknown, not their faith... Clearly too foreknowledge as mere perception is not the basis of election." (Pg. 361) He suggests, "I think we must acknowledge that God did construct a plan that included sin, and its inclusion did not come as a surprise." (Pg. 365) He contends, "(Assurance) is the realization of the truth of eternal security or perseverance. A secure salvation is a true fact whether one realizes it or not. Thus a believer has security whether or not he has assurance." (Pg. 379)
Ryrie's book is a very useful evangelical summation (although, interestingly, he does not even MENTION "dispensationalism"!), and will be of interest to students of evangelical theology.