I read this book, mainly because I went through an abusive childhood and I was intrigued by the Amish angle. I wanted to know about the abuse she endured as well as how she got to a place where she could write about her experience.
I am not Amish, nor do I know about the Amish in any great detail. I do have Mennonite co-workers and friends. My wife and I, with her brother and wife visited 'Amish' country in Ohio and in the hustle and bustle of my normal life, I will say that I liked what I saw and wanted to jump out of the car and join them.
Before I gather thoughts on writing a review I looked at other reviews on goodreads, some of which I could both agree with and some disagree with. One person brought up the 'fact' that the Amish don't take in anyone outside their culture, but I have read an article (National Geographic?), where people were able to become members of the community. According to the article it is very rare but possible. Another person, indicated that in his (Amish) community, Bishops were not elected but were chosen by lot. I believe Misty indicated that the Bishops were chosen by lot, in that several men were recommended (elected?) and given bibles where one bible had a slip of paper indicate the bearer was to become a Bishop. The reviewer also condemned the superstition/witchcraft angle of her Amish district. I know nothing about that but must make observation that there is a history of hex symbols painted on barns and many are reproduced and are for sale to the 'English'. What is the origins of the need for hex symbols? Maybe they are not any superstitions as a part of life now, but there was a time that they were. The hex signs did not come out of a vacuum, even if they are now considered endearing folk art, which is part of the Amish charm. I am sure googling the subject will bring about a lot of information, but I have said enough, I just wanted to make a couple of observations. Already, I put more work in this review then I intended.
The book did capture my imagination and I read through it in a very short time. Like others have observed, editing seem non-existent. I kept asking myself what was the point on repeating this or that aspect of her life. When she announced at the beginning of a chapter how her life was about to change for the worst (again), I didn't feel that it did. Significant was when Brian tried to kill her, and later when the Bishop assaulted her under the barn. The beatings when she and her sister were young were brutal to say the least, but she did not indicate that there was any in the Amish community, and her negative experiences seemed more like 'the growing pains' of becoming Amish. Except that she was very leery of what intentions her Amish father may have on her, she didn't report anything more than his desire to be alone with her and her Amish mother's jealousy. What is factual and what may be an exaggeration? I don't know. Why even bring up the subject of the Bishop and bestiality? She made no direct observations of the Bishop pursuing this. The author claims to be on the short end of the education spectrum, but I feel that she may have been emphasizing the wrong things in the structure of her writing. Is she going to hell if she rejects the Amish way? She said she knew more about the Bible than the Bishop did, the biblical answer was there for her to grasp and process. She regretted her need to leave the Amish community, but as she revealed what she went through before she was accepted by the Amish, there had to be a overwhelming need for family. She expressed multiple times how she and her sister did not know what normalcy was outside her mother and step-father's control.
As already indicated, there was a lot about this story that did not make sense. It is suspicious that Misty has a very balance and perfect view of herself and what is required to be a halfway decent person, but she writes about her many pleas to God and these attributes may have been passed on as part of her faith. There are things that need to be elaborated on. Cases of abuse often takes on forms that never makes sense. As an abuse survivor, I will say I am hyperaware of the possibility of abuse in everything I observe. Misty indicated her suspicions in the things she observed. I am unhappy that she reports no consequences or actions against her mother and stepdad by herself or the authorities. In my own case of abuse, even with clear proof and other victims coming forward, not much was done to my abuser. I blame that on the attitudes at that time and the lack of clear-cut actions that needed to be implemented by law enforcement and state agencys.
I liked the book. I would not recommend that you don't read the book, but it could have been written more concisely and with more thought towards the many questions her account of her abuse would generate from reading it.