This work of B.B. Warfield's, the greatest of the divines of Old Princeton is par excellence. It is eloquent, well articulated, and overall an edifying work. The book is broken out into an introduction, 8 chapters, and 2 appendices.
Van Til's introduction seemed like a bit of an afterthought on the part of the Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company. The introduction is 61 pages long and has relatively little to do with the contents of each chapter, which themselves were separate written works of Warfield's. Chapters 1-5 are a must read, and chapters 6-8 will be appreciated by seminarians who are able readers of Greek. I mostly skimmed the last 3 chapters where Warfield is responding to contemporary critics of his day due to my lack of knowledge concerning biblical languages.
The chief thesis of his work is that scripture is theopneustic, i.e., breathed out by God (1 Tim. 3:16), an ocacular work of God's, and God's very words. It is both inspired and inerrant. The Holy Scriptures are the inspired work of God born out by the Holy Spirit through the instrumentality of men. Thus, scripture is plenary in that the entirety of scripture is inspired, verbal because the very words of scripture are inspired, and confluent because scripture is the product of both men and God. Since it is co-authored by the Spirt and men:
". . .the Spirit's superintendence extends to the choice of the words by the human authors (verbal inspiration), and preserves its product from everything inconsistnent with a divine authorship—thus securing, among other things, that entire truthfulness which is everywhere presupposed in and asserted for Scripture by the Biblical writers (inerrancy)." Warfield continues, ". . .the primary ground on which it [inerrancy] has been held by the Church as the true doctrine is that it is the doctrine of the Biblical writers themselves, and has therefore the whole mass of evidence for it which goes to show that the Biblical writers are trustworthy as doctrinal guides" (173).
Warfield admonishes us that ". . .if the Biblical doctrine of inspiration is rejected, our freedom from its trammels is bought logically at the somewhat serious cost of discrediting the evidence which goes to show that the Biblical writers are trustworthy as teachers of doctrine. In this sense, the fortunes of distinctive Christianity are bound up with those of the Biblical doctrine of inspiration" (210).
This book is a must read for anyone who desires to learn more concerning the Doctrines of Inspiration, Inerrancy, or Revelation.