William Hardy McNeill was a historian and author, noted for his argument that contact and exchange among civilizations is what drives human history forward, first postulated in The Rise of the West (1963). He was the Robert A. Milikan Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Chicago, where he taught from 1947 until his retirement in 1987. In addition to winning the U.S. National Book Award in History and Biography in 1964 for The Rise of the West, McNeill received several other awards and honors. In 1985 he served as president of the American Historical Association. In 1996, McNeill won the prestigious Erasmus Prize, which the Crown Prince of the Netherlands Willem-Alexander presented to him at Amsterdam's Royal Palace. In 1999, Modern Library named The Rise of the West of the 100 Best Nonfiction Books of the 20th century. In 2009, he won the National Humanities Medal. In February 2010, President Barack Obama, a former University of Chicago professor himself, awarded McNeill the National Humanities Medal to recognize "his exceptional talent as a teacher and scholar at the University of Chicago and as an author of more than 20 books, including The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community (1963), which traces civilizations through 5,000 years of recorded history".
Bit of a chore to get through. It goes into military and religious history of south east europe from 1200 up to roughly 1750. Focuses mostly on how venice affected regions around it rather than the history of the city itself. In particular it has very little on art, architecture or the way politics worked. It is partially satisfactory to anyone wondering what on earth was happening to greeks and greek land from 1453 to 1800.
A broad survey of the happenings of Venince from his early start to its ultimate demise, this text provides valuable insight into this sometimes overlooked city state that greatly impacted Southern Europe and beyond. The early sections of the text focus mainly on Venice's expansion, social institutions, and external conflicts (especially with its rival Genoa). McNeill provides an insightful perspective on Venice's social and political instituions and how they both helped the city state grow powerful and than due to changing political and economic landscapes hindered the small city state. However, the second half of the text is just as if not more focused on Russia and Eastern Europe, as Venice has become insignficant it seemed that McNeill give its diminishing page space to how the city state impacted the cultural and religious traditions of the Russians and the Greeks. If it was anything other author this would most likely be a negative aspect (as it would be seen as a way to fill a page requirement). However, as someone who is experienced with McNeill's work, it is clear that this is a continuation of his historical goal of demonstarting the impact that exchange, from political, social, to economic, has on fuelling historical change and the development of civilisations. Thus his extensive attention on Venice's impact on eastern European regions can be seen as an case study in the exchange of culture from one entity to another.
Published oh so many years ago when I was a graduate student in history at the University of Chicago, this is a large-scale analysis and synthesis of broad patterns of political, social, economic and cultural developments linking Venice and Eastern Europe from the 11th to the 18th century. Nothing here of the trivia and minutae and politically correct anachronism that passes for much of academic history these days.