Seguindo a trilha aberta por Michel Foucault, o autor questiona o lugar comum de um olhar ativo na era moderna e argumenta no sentido contrário: desde meados do século 19, o olhar é objeto de um crescente processo de disciplinamento. Combinando análises de telas emblemáticas de Manet, Seurat e Cézanne a tratados de ótica e os primeiros experimentos com o cinema, o livro traça um panorama surpreendente e erudito sobre as transformações da visão contemporânea.
Jonathan Crary is an art critic and essayist and is Meyer Schapiro Professor of Modern Art and Theory at Columbia University in New York. His first notable works were Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the 19th Century(1990), and Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle and Modern Culture (2000). He has published critical essays for over 30 Exhibition catalogues, mostly on contemporary art. His style is often classified as observational mixed with scientific, and a dominant theme in his work is the role of the human eye. (via wiki)
I find this more convincing than his Techniques of the Observer, though I still find it infuriating how blind Crary is to issues of race and gender.
"[T]he management of attention, whether through early mass-cultural forms in the late nineteenth century or later through the television set or the computer monitor (at least in their overwhelmingly pervasive forms), has little to do with the visual contents of these screens and far more with a larger strategy of the individual. Spectacle is not primarily concerned with a looking at images but rather with the construction of conditions that individuate, immobilize, and separate subjects, even within a world in which mobility and circulation are ubiquitous."
.....so, uh, is he saying I should stop spending so much time on Facebook?
I enjoyed the first chapter very much, as Crary sets up some interesting perspectives on attention and spectacle during the transformation to 'modern' society. He introduces the relationship between attention and the discipline required for labour in a capitalism economy. He also relates the spectacle to a disempowered subject.
And using paintings as a platform to discuss perception was well done, though it seemed at times that he had to pry open his discussion to fit in his stated theses.
"The idea of subjective vision – the notion that our perceptual and sensory experience depends less on the nature of an external stimulus than on the composition and functioning of our sensory apparatus – was one of the conditions for the historical emergence of notions of autonomous vision, that is, for a severing (or liberation) of perceptual experience from a necessary relation to an exterior world. Equally important, the rapid accumulation of knowledge about the workings of a fully embodied observer disclosed possible ways that vision was open to procedures of normalization, of quantification, of discipline" (p.12).
More of a 3.5 This will definitely be useful for my thesis but I am also glad that I've finished it. It would be nice if the bibliography included more of the references found in the footnotes.
"This book is an attempt to sketch some outlines of a genealogy of attention from the nineteenth century and to detail its role in the modernization of subjectivity. More concretely, I will examine how ideas about perception and attention were transformed in the late nineteenth century alongside the emergence of new technological forms of spectacle, display, projection, attraction, and recording." p2
Who knew there were so many ways to "pay attention"-- and so many thing to pay attention to? The first chapter is great, but the overarching focus on paintings doesn't quite work for me, despite the perceptiveness of the individual readings and Crary's protestations about the level playing field of culture.