Oh, I so wanted to love this book. I started to. I was falling deep into it, curious, fascinated, and then... Well, the 'and then' aspect is difficult to talk about without spoilers, but I will do my best.
First, I want to say that I do love Ellison's writing style. She puts me in the story, with the characters, and lets me feel what they're feeling. The concept here is compelling and full of possibilities.
But I am a detail person. I want the pieces to fit, to make sense. I have to believe it can happen. And, with this story, the details didn't work.
The story is told from Aubrey's perspective. I want to like her. I want to trust her. I couldn't and I didn't. She alludes to a problematic past, trouble she's gotten into, things she did. Beneath the grieving, maybe-widow she shows us, she is whispering that we shouldn't take her at face value. That maybe she isn't such a nice person, after all.
The problem, for me, isn't so much with the questionable narrator, but with the story's execution. The details. My short explanations follow, without spoilers to fully back up my reasons:
The police immediately suspected Aubrey during the initial police investigation of Josh's disappearance. Yet, once that falls flat, the investigation appears to go nowhere else. Josh's background, his life, his friends, his associates, are never explored by detectives. Had this been done, as it should and would have been, the truth would have been uncovered rather than the case going unsolved. The answer was just too easy, too obvious.
Chase: His whole character was too convenient, from his appearance at exactly the right moment, to the instant attraction, to, well, all of it.
The flashbacks: They are constant. The story is told in back-and-forth time, disordered, with chapters from Aubrey's youth, chapters from Josh's youth, chapters from Aubrey and Josh's marriage, etc. Maybe this is a pet peeve of mine. It probably is. But I get annoyed when this technique is relied upon as a constant throughout a story, in order to make readers understand the characters. I don't need to see the character acting out as a teen, falling in love as a teen, fighting with his mother as a teen, and on it goes. I don't need or want constant chapter flashbacks. With rare exceptions, I want to be in the moment, in the story that is happening.
Finally, what had me rolling my eyes and muttering, is the string of unrealistic coincidences, combined with the revelation at the end, which isn't much of a surprise, but still made me question all that I'd read.
And, so, this story requires that you not look too hard at the details. If you're able to do that, then the story does offer an intriguing look at human nature.
*I was provided with an advance ebook copy by the publisher, via NetGalley, in exchange for my honest opinion.*