I rated this book a 1-star not because it was poorly written or because I disagreed with perspectives given in the book, but because of the author's treatment of certain topics covered. Below are three examples:
1. In discussing women's roles, the author describes Deborah the judge as "assisting Barak in accomplishing his mission." While there are compelling biblical arguments for the full spectrum of stances on gender roles, some are obviously more troublesome for any given stance than others. For Andreades to bring up a character in Scripture who held the highest office in Israel and describe her leadership as assisting a subordinate male who was reporting to her and under her God-given authority displays either intellectual dishonesty or an unwillingness to seriously engage Scripture objectively rather than taking one's stance and shoehorning all of Scripture into it.
2. In discussing same sex attraction, Andreades cites one study and then makes a sweeping statement that basically anyone with same sex attraction can change their desires. This is an incredibly harmful generalization for those who experience same sex attraction, do not want it, and have not found any success in dismissing those desires (I am not speaking to acting on desires, simply having them). The fact that the author of the study referenced, Dr. Mark Yarhouse, would almost certainly disagree with Andreades claim on this point makes this all the more concerning (See Homosexuality and the Christian by Yarhouse).
3. Again, in discussing same sex attraction, Andreades, in a chapter of less than five pages, tells a story of a heterosexual marriage between people who have experienced same sex attraction and uses that story to insinuate, if not outright say, that everyone with same sex attraction should just get hitched to someone of the opposite sex and things will get better, though it will probably be hard.
I can understand people having any of these perspectives, but to write a book about them and handle the topics so cursorily seems irresponsible and dangerous. Some of the material in this book was handled very thoroughly and with expertise, but some with just the opposite.