Logic first published in 2016, provides a neat summary of practical logic and reasoning. According to this book, logic is considered the foundation of the three linguistic arts of logic, grammar, and rhetoric. Reason engages us with the present, by helping us understand the past and plan for the future, while logic is said to be the laws by which reason operates.
After the introduction, this book is divided into about 30 sub-sections, each which describe a different component of logic. While most sections cover topics that a high school class in English writing will teach you, some sections were surprisingly refreshing such as: 1) dilemmas and 2) linguistic/non linguistic fallacies.
The most useful section I read from this book was dealing with dilemmas. According to this book dilemmas can be dealt with in two ways. First, is grasping the horns of a dilemma. With such a method, you show that one or both of the major premises is false. This will break the connection between the antecedent and the consequent. Second, dilemmas can be met with a counter dilemma, with rebuttal. This is done by constructing a new dilemma from the same premises, but with a new and opposite conclusion.
My favorite section overall in its surprising conclusions was the existence of linguistic and non-linguistic fallacies. In linguistic fallacies, one can take distributive qualities and attribute them to the collective (composition fallacy) or then can take collective qualities and attribute them to distributive ones (division fallacy). Regarding non-linguistic fallacies, some include the "in this respect" (what is true in certain respects is assumed true in all respects), "during this, therefore because of this" (where because two things occur at the same time, they must be linked), and finally "complex question fallacy" (smuggling an assumption into the question and demanding a single answer).