The Devil's Star is probably the best written of the Jo Nesbo's mystery thriller series starring Harry Hole I've read so far. As I have said, for no particular reason I seem to be alternating these Nesbo mysteries with the widly contrasting Agatha Christie series featuring the elderly (Miss) Jane Marple. The contrast, as you might imagine, is jarring, and calls forth the most obvious kinds of commentary about the literary and cultural differences in the fifty years between the time that the Marples I am reading were written and the twenty-first century Holes.
And the differences seem to be more and more marked. The Devil's Star is about three or four principal things: 1) Harry's dogged pursuit of a particularly brutal (as opposed to what, kind?) serial killer who leaves as one calling card (and clue) a jewel on each of his victims in the shape of a pentagram or "devil's star" associated withe demonology and the occult; 2) Hole's continuing obsession with his colleague Tom Waaler's (possible) role in the death of their mutual colleague Ellen; 3) Harry's alcoholism and despair, and 4) his relationship to Rakel, her son and the possibilities for a "normal life" with her.
Harry is assigned to work on the serial killer case with his nemesis Waaler. They have a kind of Batman-Joker origin comparison going on here for me. Both have had traumatic losses that shape their rogue decision-making, their "outsider" or maverick status, their willingness to break the law to get results. Waaler wants Hole to join him in an enterprise that is illegal, but could create quicker and more dramatic results for Harry's purposes. Why not? What difference is there between Waaler and Hole? But there is a difference, and you know there is without even reading it.
This is by far the darkest of the novels so far; Harry's despair/struggle with alconolism coincides with his never-ending obsession to solve his friend Ellen's case, and in the process damages his relationship with Rakel. And then there's all the serial killing itself, which seems to be a kind of set-piece for mystery/thriller writing (though if a kind of serial killer exists in Christie mysteries, they are never grisly, of course). At its worst in Nesbo, it can veer into "torture porn," (by which I mean it is supposed to get readers obsessed with the physical aspects of the killings; I don't literally mean pornography with torture in it) something I am not interested in at all, I am sick of mysteries about serial kilers, but at the same time, I was interested in how the pentagram in this story reminded me of Alan Moore's From Hell, which poses a pentagram/occult theory about the Jack the Ripper (also five) killings.
And, I'll admit that I was interested in how the two main crime stories--about Waaler, and about the serial killer--come together in interesting ways, and the writing is sharper, more focused and faster than in any of the previous books. It's not often what you'd call pleasant, in fact almost never that, but Nesbo keeps getting better at his craft. And I like how in the end we don't yet know some important things: How deep is the corruption in the police department? Will Harry give up police work and say, drive a cab instead? Will his relationship with Rakel last? Set-ups for the next book, I think.
The cover of my copy of the audiobook version I listened to announces (in a book published several years ago) that Nesbo has sold more than 25 million copies of his books in many languages, so it must be double that by now. Not quite what Christie has sold, but he's also got a few years and a few books to catch up to her. It's funny, both are great writers at what they do but I am somewhat unsatisfied with them for opposite reasons: One, this "cozy" mystery writer is usually too cozy and charming and light for me in these Marple books, but Nesbo has the opposite problem for me at times: He's just too brutal and nasty at the most extreme moments. As in, for those who have read it, the conversations between Harry and the serial killer that detail some of what he did, ugh. But maybe that's just me.
One continuing nitpick: Why can almost no one pronounce Harry Hole's name correctly in these audiobooks!!?? (It should be like "Hoo-leh" and not Hole). In this one the reader pronounces it three different ways. But he never makes that mistake with the German in the text. Do your homework, dudes!