This is an odd book. Peter C. Bouteneff is a lecturer in theology at St. Vladimir’s Seminary in the United States. He happened to meet Arvo Pärt years ago when the two stayed at the same monastery. Later Bouteneff became a fan of Pärt’s music and arranged a series of concerts of Pärt works in New York, an occasion on which Pärt was also awarded an honorary doctorate from SVS. In this book, Bouteneff seeks to link Arvo Pärt’s music more closely to the teachings of the Orthodox Church. Pärt is a devout Orthodox believer, and nearly all of his music sets specifically Christian texts, but media coverage generally depicts the music as only vaguely “spiritual” and doesn’t delve too deeply into any particularly religious affiliation.
In fact, this book falls neatly into two halves. In the first, Bouteneff does write specifically about Pärt, giving a good overview of his aesthetic and why it resonates with listeners of all stripes. This is fairly enjoyable and contains some trivia on Pärt’s life and work that fans might appreciate.
The second half of the book is more problematic. Bouteneff delves deeply into Orthodox teachings on the value of silence and prayer. However, readers will be disappointed to find that the link to Pärt’s music specifically is lost; page after page goes by without Pärt being mentioned at all. Furthermore, while Pärt is an Orthodox believer, he has repeatedly claimed that his musical style draws more on the West than the East. Therefore, while Pärt would certainly admire these teachings of the Church Fathers, they fact that they congrue so well with his music feels like something of a coincidence.
Also, the book suffers from the same rather schizophrenic identity that many feels afflicts St. Vladimir’s in general, of being a mainstream academic institution at the same time that it really exists to train clergy in Church dogma that one shouldn’t be shy about at all. Bouteneff starts off with a very academic introduction that tries hard to evince a sort of neutrality, but it is clear that the Orthodox teachings that make up the second half of the book really do matter to him. The reader therefore gets the impression that the introduction is just pure academic boilerplate, not sincere or willingly written at all, and it is a shame that SVS faculty feel forced to include this kind of stuff in their publications.