I’ve been very impressed so far with Gladstone’s anatomisation of capitalism through a lens of gods and monsters, but as our world continues to spin into the dark I increasingly notice the places where this mirror feels unduly optimistic. Yes, there are demons and debt-zombies, and the notion of 'too big to fail' can necessitate terrible things, such as the murder of renascent deities. But on some level, it’s still a very optimistic world. There are costs along the way, for sure, but these are stories where for the most part the good guys win, in exactly the way that doesn’t tend to happen under late-stage capitalism. Where the system may be rigged, but justice can still prevail. Where sometimes, faced with the grinding of the uncaring machineries of law, and the ruthless machinations of well-prepared opponents with deep pockets, you can still get a happy result simply by asking nicely, or suggesting to an unimaginably powerful necromancer that maybe if he were less of an arsehole his old friends might occasionally call. Hells, even if it only appears here as part of an attempted deicide, this is a world that genuinely has antitrust legislation with teeth! An airline operated by dragons is one thing, but some concepts are just too outlandish to imagine.
And once you notice that problem, it’s like pulling on an intricate magico-legal Craft contract’s weakest clause, and other flaws become evident. The opening chapter spelling out the story so far and the stakes makes a degree of sense (this initially seems like the Craft Sequence’s straightest sequel*, though early references to Gabby Jones and Red King Consolidated hint that a certain amount of dovetailing will follow), but it doesn’t need to be quite this unsubtly expository. And the most overt romance plot, despite being between a vampire pirate and a semi-possessed super cop, is sufficiently Hollywood that at times I was picturing them as Bruce Willis and Julia Roberts at the end of The Player (“Traffic was a bitch”).
Still. The other characters are compelling company, and even the least likeable of them are driven by plausible engines, never mere narrative convenience. The plot may err on the sunny side, but it’s well-constructed, and has just the right balance of surprise with satisfactory playing out of established tenets. And above all, those ideas! It’s not just the financial-legal system that Gladstone’s recast in fantasy terms, and every time his stand-in brings out elements of the real in new and thought-provoking contexts. The news, for instance, which in a plausible step up from town criers, is sung. The character of the musical accompaniment obviously making a world of difference to how it’s received. Now obviously we all know that the editing and contextualising of news contributes at least as much to its effect as whatever facts it may contain, but isn’t that a splendid reminder of how? And in general, Gladstone has a brilliant grasp of how words and concepts work, how 'faith’ means very different things to a corporate lawyer and a saint, whilst to the many trapped between those two poles it partakes of both with potentially awful consequences (what was that line about serving two masters?). He may not offer full answers about how power and freedom and interconnection work, but he asks better questions than most. And when it comes to theology – by which I mean really thinking about gods, not just the usual modern meaning of untangling the clutter one particularly grotty death cult has accumulated – he’s one of the very few writers to bear comparison with John Higgs or Alan Moore. "Kos Everburning, like all his divine ilk, did not quite exist in the usual, physical sense of the term—but human minds weren’t good at comprehending n-dimensional noosphere entities, half-network and half-standing wave, propagating in all directions at once through time."
*Considered in publication order, 4 was a prequel to 2 by some decades, and 3 sort of stands off to one side, but this, 5, follows directly from 1, and only a year later. The internal chronology, on the other hand, is 4, 2, 1, 5, 3. The latter is how I read them, and I love the rhythm of the sequence written down like that.