What do you think?
Rate this book


100 pages, Unknown Binding
First published August 1, 2015
Here was a possible meaning of Reconstruction: all forms of economic dependence are incompatible with free citizenship. In the name of freedom, being without property and depen- dent on employers was a condition that also had to be abolished. Free people had a right to some share of the means of production — be it land or some other productive property. They even had a right to take it from those who opposed this equal freedom.
Casting their concerns in a familiar, post–Civil War idiom, they[The Knights of Labor] asked, “Is there a workshop where obedience is not demanded —not to the difficulties or qualities of the labor to be performed —but to the caprice of he who pays the wages of his servants?” They called the new wage labor “wage slavery” and they wanted “to abolish as rapidly as possible, the wage system, substituting co-operation therefore.”
Former slaves were now modern workers and the Knights trumpeted the same emancipatory language throughout the nation, heralding “co-operation” as a solution to the problems facing wage laborers everywhere. They sought a reconstruction not just of the South but of the entire country.
This program of liberation through cooperative self-organization, articulated in the transracial language of making all workers into their own bosses, scared Northern industrialists just as much as Southern planters.