What do you think?
Rate this book
Arguments with Gandhi
Gandhi for a new his major legacies and why they still matter, from his foremost biographer.
Any shortlist of the most impactful political leaders of the twentieth century must include Gandhi, and once we eliminate the tyrants—Mao, Stalin, and Hitler—Gandhi stands virtually alone. He created one of our most effective weapons for political change in nonviolent collective resistance, a strategy that powered the American civil rights movement and remains potent today. Gandhi devoted his life to a movement that defeated the British Empire in India, and mounted similarly audacious challenges to his own society. In a nation of deep religious divisions, he insisted that Hindus and Muslims should live peaceably together. He embraced justice in relations of gender and race, and advocated for the end of Untouchable status. He opposed rapid industrial development on grounds of environmental sustainability. In this elegant, authoritative study, Ramachandra Guha gives us clear, up-close views of Gandhi's positions, the arguments they drew, and their afterlives to the present day.
Any shortlist of the most impactful political leaders of the twentieth century must include Gandhi, and once we eliminate the tyrants—Mao, Stalin, and Hitler—Gandhi stands virtually alone. He created one of our most effective weapons for political change in nonviolent collective resistance, a strategy that powered the American civil rights movement and remains potent today. Gandhi devoted his life to a movement that defeated the British Empire in India, and mounted similarly audacious challenges to his own society. In a nation of deep religious divisions, he insisted that Hindus and Muslims should live peaceably together. He embraced justice in relations of gender and race, and advocated for the end of Untouchable status. He opposed rapid industrial development on grounds of environmental sustainability. In this elegant, authoritative study, Ramachandra Guha gives us clear, up-close views of Gandhi's positions, the arguments they drew, and their afterlives to the present day.
412 pages, Hardcover
Published January 1, 2026
About the author
Ramachandra Guha
114 books1,655 followersRamachandra Guha was born in Dehradun in 1958, and educated in Delhi and Calcutta. He has taught at the University of Oslo, Stanford, and Yale, and at the Indian Institute of Science. He has been a Fellow of the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, and also served as the Indo-American Community Chair Visiting Professor at the University of California at Berkeley.
After a peripatetic academic career, with five jobs in ten years on three continents, Guha settled down to become a full-time writer based in Bangalore. His books cover a wide range of themes, including a global history of environmentalism, a biography of an anthropologist-activist, a social history of Indian cricket, and a social history of Himalayan peasants.
Guha’s books and essays have been translated into more than twenty languages. The prizes they have won include the U.K. Cricket Society’s Literary Award and the Leopold-Hidy Prize of the American Society of Environmental History.
After a peripatetic academic career, with five jobs in ten years on three continents, Guha settled down to become a full-time writer based in Bangalore. His books cover a wide range of themes, including a global history of environmentalism, a biography of an anthropologist-activist, a social history of Indian cricket, and a social history of Himalayan peasants.
Guha’s books and essays have been translated into more than twenty languages. The prizes they have won include the U.K. Cricket Society’s Literary Award and the Leopold-Hidy Prize of the American Society of Environmental History.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Review of advance copy
I must have been about twelve years old when I was spending an afternoon with one of my father's friends, who knew how much I loved asking questions and learning new things. He asked me what I was being taught in school, and I enthusiastically told him about Gandhi, his non-violent protests, and how I was in awe of a man with a walking stick and a loincloth who had managed to drag an entire nation towards freedom through the sheer power of his will.
The uncle did me the wonderful courtesy of treating me as someone worth arguing with. He disagreed with me. He argued that Gandhi's insistence on non-violence had prolonged British rule and that millions of ordinary Indians had suffered because of it. Indians outnumbered the British by orders of magnitude, he told me, and had they been properly organised and encouraged to fight, we might have achieved independence decades earlier. Naturally, I had very little to say in response. My knowledge of Indian history began and ended with what my school textbooks had told me, and I was hardly in a position to challenge an adult on the finer points of revolutionary warfare. But I have remembered that conversation ever since. It was the first time someone had challenged the almost universally reverential account of Gandhi that I, like most Indian children, had grown up with.
This book revisits that argument, except that the people doing the arguing are considerably more learned than either my father's friend or I could ever hope to be.
Non-violence is so central to Gandhi's philosophy that I had never really stopped to wonder where his ideas came from. I knew about his years in South Africa, of course, but was surprised to discover how much he had borrowed from the women's suffrage movement in England. During his visits to London in 1906 and 1909, Gandhi watched British women protesting for the right to vote, willingly facing imprisonment and police brutality for their cause. He admired their courage and drew upon their methods when organising his own campaigns of civil resistance in South Africa. Guha then traces how Gandhi's ideas travelled across the world, influencing Martin Luther King Jr., the struggle against apartheid, and political movements in countries such as Kenya and Botswana. I particularly enjoyed learning about these connections, many of which I had never encountered before.
One of the things I dislike most about the current political environment in India is the constant vilification of anyone who disagrees with the Hindu majoritarian politics of the ruling establishment. This book helped me understand just how far back some of these hostilities go. Gandhi had no shortage of enemies, even among people who wanted India to be free. The communists thought he was preventing a revolution, the Hindu nationalists despised his insistence on Hindu-Muslim unity, and plenty of other people believed he was holding the country back in one way or another. What I found particularly interesting was how the Hindu right has had to negotiate the rather inconvenient fact that the man it despises is also the Father of the Nation. Some have maintained the pretence of respecting Gandhi while quietly rejecting much of what he stood for, while others have dispensed with the pretence altogether.
Guha's account of V. D. Savarkar, Nathuram Godse, and the ideological origins of the RSS was particularly unsettling. Savarkar's ideas of Hindu supremacy, Godse's fanatical conviction that Gandhi had betrayed the Hindus, and the survival of these beliefs in contemporary Indian politics make for uncomfortable reading. I have always found the growing rehabilitation of Godse deeply disturbing, and reading about the intellectual traditions that produced him has done little to improve my opinion. It is difficult to imagine two more different visions of India than those of Gandhi and his assassin. One insisted that Hindus and Muslims had an equal claim to the country, while the other murdered him for what he saw as an unforgivable betrayal of the Hindu cause. That people should now openly celebrate Godse while condemning Gandhi is a particularly depressing reflection of how far Indian politics has travelled.
For all his admiration of Gandhi, Guha is not writing a hagiography. He discusses Gandhi's more questionable beliefs and behaviour, including his deeply uncomfortable experiments with celibacy, which involved sharing a bed with young women, including his own grandniece, supposedly to test his ability to resist sexual temptation. There is no particularly charitable way of looking at this, and I am glad Guha does not shy away from it.
One of my favourite chapter titles in the book is "The Partial Unmaking of an Indian Patriarch". Gandhi grew up in the deeply patriarchal society of nineteenth-century Saurashtra, carrying many of its prejudices into his early adulthood. But he gradually abandoned several of these beliefs and became one of the most influential advocates for women's participation in public life. He encouraged women to join political movements at a time when their place in society was still largely confined to the household. His attitudes towards sex, contraception, and certain aspects of women's lives remained deeply conservative, but he was remarkably progressive compared with many of his contemporaries. I don't think we need to pretend that Gandhi was a feminist by every modern standard to appreciate how radical some of his views were in the society in which he lived. I loved this chapter, particularly because it showed how much Gandhi himself had changed over the course of his life.
My principal criticism of the book is that Guha seems to go rather easy on Gandhi's economic philosophy. Gandhi's romantic attachment to the self-sufficient Indian village and his suspicion of industrialisation may have been understandable in the context of colonial exploitation, but I find his prescriptions for India's development thoroughly unconvincing. Industrialisation, urbanisation, and market economies have lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty across the world, while India's own experiments with excessive state planning did us few favours. Guha makes a persuasive case for Gandhi's early recognition of the environmental costs of industrial growth, and I agree that these concerns deserve attention. But recognising the problems of industrialisation is one thing; proposing that an enormous, impoverished country organise its economy around largely self-sufficient villages is quite another. I wish Guha had been more critical of this.
I was even more disappointed by his discussion of Gandhi's views on medicine. Gandhi wanted traditional Indian systems such as Ayurveda and Unani to work alongside modern medicine, and Guha seems pleased that the Indian government has finally established programmes encouraging such collaboration. I find this naive at best and disingenuous at worst. I am not sure when the existence of a government research programme became evidence of scientific validity. Much of what passes for traditional medicine has never survived rigorous scientific scrutiny, and the treatments that do show genuine efficacy should be evaluated and incorporated into evidence-based medicine like everything else. Given how careful Guha is about questioning inherited beliefs elsewhere in the book, I was surprised by his generosity here.
But I have spent enough words complaining about what are, ultimately, fairly small disagreements with an excellent book. Guha has a wonderful gift for writing history. He can take an argument between two people who died decades ago, explain the historical circumstances in which it arose, follow its consequences across countries and generations, and somehow make the entire thing a pleasure to read. There is an enormous amount of scholarship behind this book, but it never feels like hard work to get through. I particularly enjoyed how frequently I would come across some obscure historical detail and find myself wanting to put the book down to read more about it.
This is only the second book of Ramachandra Guha's that I have read, and I am very fond of his writing. He has the ability to teach you an extraordinary amount of history without making you feel as though you are sitting through a history lesson. I hope he continues writing for a very long time, because I certainly intend to keep reading him. And judging by how much I have enjoyed these first two books, I really ought to have started sooner.
The uncle did me the wonderful courtesy of treating me as someone worth arguing with. He disagreed with me. He argued that Gandhi's insistence on non-violence had prolonged British rule and that millions of ordinary Indians had suffered because of it. Indians outnumbered the British by orders of magnitude, he told me, and had they been properly organised and encouraged to fight, we might have achieved independence decades earlier. Naturally, I had very little to say in response. My knowledge of Indian history began and ended with what my school textbooks had told me, and I was hardly in a position to challenge an adult on the finer points of revolutionary warfare. But I have remembered that conversation ever since. It was the first time someone had challenged the almost universally reverential account of Gandhi that I, like most Indian children, had grown up with.
This book revisits that argument, except that the people doing the arguing are considerably more learned than either my father's friend or I could ever hope to be.
Non-violence is so central to Gandhi's philosophy that I had never really stopped to wonder where his ideas came from. I knew about his years in South Africa, of course, but was surprised to discover how much he had borrowed from the women's suffrage movement in England. During his visits to London in 1906 and 1909, Gandhi watched British women protesting for the right to vote, willingly facing imprisonment and police brutality for their cause. He admired their courage and drew upon their methods when organising his own campaigns of civil resistance in South Africa. Guha then traces how Gandhi's ideas travelled across the world, influencing Martin Luther King Jr., the struggle against apartheid, and political movements in countries such as Kenya and Botswana. I particularly enjoyed learning about these connections, many of which I had never encountered before.
One of the things I dislike most about the current political environment in India is the constant vilification of anyone who disagrees with the Hindu majoritarian politics of the ruling establishment. This book helped me understand just how far back some of these hostilities go. Gandhi had no shortage of enemies, even among people who wanted India to be free. The communists thought he was preventing a revolution, the Hindu nationalists despised his insistence on Hindu-Muslim unity, and plenty of other people believed he was holding the country back in one way or another. What I found particularly interesting was how the Hindu right has had to negotiate the rather inconvenient fact that the man it despises is also the Father of the Nation. Some have maintained the pretence of respecting Gandhi while quietly rejecting much of what he stood for, while others have dispensed with the pretence altogether.
Guha's account of V. D. Savarkar, Nathuram Godse, and the ideological origins of the RSS was particularly unsettling. Savarkar's ideas of Hindu supremacy, Godse's fanatical conviction that Gandhi had betrayed the Hindus, and the survival of these beliefs in contemporary Indian politics make for uncomfortable reading. I have always found the growing rehabilitation of Godse deeply disturbing, and reading about the intellectual traditions that produced him has done little to improve my opinion. It is difficult to imagine two more different visions of India than those of Gandhi and his assassin. One insisted that Hindus and Muslims had an equal claim to the country, while the other murdered him for what he saw as an unforgivable betrayal of the Hindu cause. That people should now openly celebrate Godse while condemning Gandhi is a particularly depressing reflection of how far Indian politics has travelled.
For all his admiration of Gandhi, Guha is not writing a hagiography. He discusses Gandhi's more questionable beliefs and behaviour, including his deeply uncomfortable experiments with celibacy, which involved sharing a bed with young women, including his own grandniece, supposedly to test his ability to resist sexual temptation. There is no particularly charitable way of looking at this, and I am glad Guha does not shy away from it.
One of my favourite chapter titles in the book is "The Partial Unmaking of an Indian Patriarch". Gandhi grew up in the deeply patriarchal society of nineteenth-century Saurashtra, carrying many of its prejudices into his early adulthood. But he gradually abandoned several of these beliefs and became one of the most influential advocates for women's participation in public life. He encouraged women to join political movements at a time when their place in society was still largely confined to the household. His attitudes towards sex, contraception, and certain aspects of women's lives remained deeply conservative, but he was remarkably progressive compared with many of his contemporaries. I don't think we need to pretend that Gandhi was a feminist by every modern standard to appreciate how radical some of his views were in the society in which he lived. I loved this chapter, particularly because it showed how much Gandhi himself had changed over the course of his life.
My principal criticism of the book is that Guha seems to go rather easy on Gandhi's economic philosophy. Gandhi's romantic attachment to the self-sufficient Indian village and his suspicion of industrialisation may have been understandable in the context of colonial exploitation, but I find his prescriptions for India's development thoroughly unconvincing. Industrialisation, urbanisation, and market economies have lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty across the world, while India's own experiments with excessive state planning did us few favours. Guha makes a persuasive case for Gandhi's early recognition of the environmental costs of industrial growth, and I agree that these concerns deserve attention. But recognising the problems of industrialisation is one thing; proposing that an enormous, impoverished country organise its economy around largely self-sufficient villages is quite another. I wish Guha had been more critical of this.
I was even more disappointed by his discussion of Gandhi's views on medicine. Gandhi wanted traditional Indian systems such as Ayurveda and Unani to work alongside modern medicine, and Guha seems pleased that the Indian government has finally established programmes encouraging such collaboration. I find this naive at best and disingenuous at worst. I am not sure when the existence of a government research programme became evidence of scientific validity. Much of what passes for traditional medicine has never survived rigorous scientific scrutiny, and the treatments that do show genuine efficacy should be evaluated and incorporated into evidence-based medicine like everything else. Given how careful Guha is about questioning inherited beliefs elsewhere in the book, I was surprised by his generosity here.
But I have spent enough words complaining about what are, ultimately, fairly small disagreements with an excellent book. Guha has a wonderful gift for writing history. He can take an argument between two people who died decades ago, explain the historical circumstances in which it arose, follow its consequences across countries and generations, and somehow make the entire thing a pleasure to read. There is an enormous amount of scholarship behind this book, but it never feels like hard work to get through. I particularly enjoyed how frequently I would come across some obscure historical detail and find myself wanting to put the book down to read more about it.
This is only the second book of Ramachandra Guha's that I have read, and I am very fond of his writing. He has the ability to teach you an extraordinary amount of history without making you feel as though you are sitting through a history lesson. I hope he continues writing for a very long time, because I certainly intend to keep reading him. And judging by how much I have enjoyed these first two books, I really ought to have started sooner.
October 16, 2026
Very interesting. Illuminating events and personalities from a highly impactful period of Indian history and also interpreting current happenings both at global and national levels.
Well read J Dev Haldar.
Well read J Dev Haldar.
Review of advance copy
In this book Guha who had written brilliant two part biography on Gandhi does something quite different and remarkable. He tries to place how Gandhi was looked up by people with diverse perspectives, for example how did the Marxists look at him or the colonialists and various other revolutionaries thought about him. Guha also focusses on how these diverse views seem to have continued even to this day. For example in his life time it was the Marxists who criticised him vehemently on his usage of non violence and considered him a reactionary who is opposing the coming of a revolution whereas today this is taken over by the BJP for very different reasons. They see his non violence and spirit of accomodation as a weakening the masculine force they wish to kindle in the hindu youth. The book is divided into four broad themes in which Gandhi's ideas and arguments are debated.
1) Use of violence vs non-violence in bringing up change.
It is still a topic of continous debate amongst even many Indians, even few days back one of my friends here argued that if not for Gandhi's dogmatic application of non violence India would have got independence even more earlier. Ram guha explores this aspect brilliantly and shows how different forces during that time like revolutionaries like Bhagath Singh, marxists like MN Roy, then later hindutva ideologues Savarkar charged Gandhi on his sometimes mysterious obsession with non-violence. But for a student of history, world events after the collapse of soviet union and how countries which attained independence through violent means have ended up, it is crystal clear how greatful one should be in Gandhi's shunning of violence. It was just not the act of achieving independence but what kind of independence that matters. Gandhi's non violent movement trained India to be a multiparty democracy. It also just not the achievement of independence, but how the freedom movement through its mass participation of especially women and men from different social groups ensured India could reform itself from its social ills. The ensuing freedom was not won by a minority vanguard like how it happened in communist revolutions but through broad participation of the masses.
2) Second with respect to justice especially with respect to caste, race and gender and Gandhi's thoughts and ideas.
Gandhi is routinely criticised to have not gone enough in criticising the system of caste, his thoughts on women were sometimes regressive and not palatable to feminists of today. In a simillar vein his early day comments on blacks have also been criticized as racial. Guha brilliantly points out the problem in such criticism. As the writings of Gandhi is extremely well documented, and he never sanitized anything with respect to public opinion or what would be perceived as liberal for his age there are examples of such thoughts. But Gandhi was always way ahead in his actions with respect to what he practiced, and also in many of Gandhi's ideas went through a constant evolution. So to understand Gandhi it is important to understand this evolution. For instance at somepoint Gandhi thought untouchability to be a sin but he still defended the caste system and varnashrama. But even during this phase of his life he was living in an ashram where everyone was expected to clean everyone else toilet. Yet over the years his ideas on caste underwent a tremendous evolution, he infact says in a letter that the very system of caste must go and says he will only bless intercaste marriages from here on , hoping one of the couple should be a harijan.
3) Gandhi and Religious harmony
Gandhi unlike many of the athiests of his time, didnt shun religion itself as a backward form of thought. He felt that every religion has its own strengths and weakness and hoped that people belonging to every religion should be willing to learn from others and respect every religion. For his age its truly difficult to see any other world leader who had such diverse friends belonging to different religions. He was also unwilling to accept the materialism of the athiests. He felt relgiion could offer humans meaning, comfort and a sense of compassion and moral basis for their lives. He was against feelings of religious superiority or belief in one's own religion as the only true path. He had life long abidding interest in learning from every religion in the world and this he tryly believed would make him a better hindu.
4) Progress And Environment
Amongst all his major concerns the one that was mostly misunderstood was his concern regarding west style economic development. In his life and also most of the decades after his death this was seen as ludicurous, scientists, politicians just quietly ignored this some quixotic idea of an old man. Like how we all have aspects of our fathers and grandfather which we find it embarassing, Gandhi's thoughts on economic development, his criticism of modern civilisation was seen in this regard.Both Free market ideologues and Marxists found Gandhi's idea heavily anachronistic. But after the threat of global warming there is a growing importance given world over towards Gandhi's ideas on sustainable development. Gandhi was deeply worried about the inherent violence in modern economic development, he found it that this just increases the wants of people and this if followed by India and China aping the west he warned will strip the earth bare as locusts. We can agree with him today, the ecological cost of the development has resulted in massive environment disasters. Gandhi continues to remain an inspiration for environmental workers all over the world in this regard. Although I still have doubts about his suggestion on simple living but the world is reluctantly admitting to the fact the resources of the earth are infact finite.
In this way this book gave me a lot to ponder about Gandhi, his life still feels so relevant in all the above aspects and much more even close to a century after his death. Closing in i wish to share to quote Gandhi mentions from a letter to MN Roy. Roy is vociferously advocating an armed revolution in the Russian style. It shows his remarkable intellectual humility and his faith in alternate viewpoints.
"We are all very imperfect and weak things and, if we are to destroy all whose ways we do not like, there will be not a man left alive."
1) Use of violence vs non-violence in bringing up change.
It is still a topic of continous debate amongst even many Indians, even few days back one of my friends here argued that if not for Gandhi's dogmatic application of non violence India would have got independence even more earlier. Ram guha explores this aspect brilliantly and shows how different forces during that time like revolutionaries like Bhagath Singh, marxists like MN Roy, then later hindutva ideologues Savarkar charged Gandhi on his sometimes mysterious obsession with non-violence. But for a student of history, world events after the collapse of soviet union and how countries which attained independence through violent means have ended up, it is crystal clear how greatful one should be in Gandhi's shunning of violence. It was just not the act of achieving independence but what kind of independence that matters. Gandhi's non violent movement trained India to be a multiparty democracy. It also just not the achievement of independence, but how the freedom movement through its mass participation of especially women and men from different social groups ensured India could reform itself from its social ills. The ensuing freedom was not won by a minority vanguard like how it happened in communist revolutions but through broad participation of the masses.
2) Second with respect to justice especially with respect to caste, race and gender and Gandhi's thoughts and ideas.
Gandhi is routinely criticised to have not gone enough in criticising the system of caste, his thoughts on women were sometimes regressive and not palatable to feminists of today. In a simillar vein his early day comments on blacks have also been criticized as racial. Guha brilliantly points out the problem in such criticism. As the writings of Gandhi is extremely well documented, and he never sanitized anything with respect to public opinion or what would be perceived as liberal for his age there are examples of such thoughts. But Gandhi was always way ahead in his actions with respect to what he practiced, and also in many of Gandhi's ideas went through a constant evolution. So to understand Gandhi it is important to understand this evolution. For instance at somepoint Gandhi thought untouchability to be a sin but he still defended the caste system and varnashrama. But even during this phase of his life he was living in an ashram where everyone was expected to clean everyone else toilet. Yet over the years his ideas on caste underwent a tremendous evolution, he infact says in a letter that the very system of caste must go and says he will only bless intercaste marriages from here on , hoping one of the couple should be a harijan.
3) Gandhi and Religious harmony
Gandhi unlike many of the athiests of his time, didnt shun religion itself as a backward form of thought. He felt that every religion has its own strengths and weakness and hoped that people belonging to every religion should be willing to learn from others and respect every religion. For his age its truly difficult to see any other world leader who had such diverse friends belonging to different religions. He was also unwilling to accept the materialism of the athiests. He felt relgiion could offer humans meaning, comfort and a sense of compassion and moral basis for their lives. He was against feelings of religious superiority or belief in one's own religion as the only true path. He had life long abidding interest in learning from every religion in the world and this he tryly believed would make him a better hindu.
4) Progress And Environment
Amongst all his major concerns the one that was mostly misunderstood was his concern regarding west style economic development. In his life and also most of the decades after his death this was seen as ludicurous, scientists, politicians just quietly ignored this some quixotic idea of an old man. Like how we all have aspects of our fathers and grandfather which we find it embarassing, Gandhi's thoughts on economic development, his criticism of modern civilisation was seen in this regard.Both Free market ideologues and Marxists found Gandhi's idea heavily anachronistic. But after the threat of global warming there is a growing importance given world over towards Gandhi's ideas on sustainable development. Gandhi was deeply worried about the inherent violence in modern economic development, he found it that this just increases the wants of people and this if followed by India and China aping the west he warned will strip the earth bare as locusts. We can agree with him today, the ecological cost of the development has resulted in massive environment disasters. Gandhi continues to remain an inspiration for environmental workers all over the world in this regard. Although I still have doubts about his suggestion on simple living but the world is reluctantly admitting to the fact the resources of the earth are infact finite.
In this way this book gave me a lot to ponder about Gandhi, his life still feels so relevant in all the above aspects and much more even close to a century after his death. Closing in i wish to share to quote Gandhi mentions from a letter to MN Roy. Roy is vociferously advocating an armed revolution in the Russian style. It shows his remarkable intellectual humility and his faith in alternate viewpoints.
"We are all very imperfect and weak things and, if we are to destroy all whose ways we do not like, there will be not a man left alive."
Read
August 12, 2026Arguments with Gandhi arrives at an especially interesting moment because Gandhi’s legacy continues to provoke admiration, disagreement, and reinterpretation across generations. In this forthcoming work, Ramachandra Guha brings his authority as one of Gandhi’s foremost biographers to a focused examination of the ideas, conflicts, and enduring consequences surrounding one of the twentieth century’s most influential political figures.
What makes the book particularly compelling is that it does not appear content simply to celebrate Gandhi’s achievements. Instead, its very framing around “arguments” creates room for a more dynamic examination of his political and social thought. Gandhi’s commitment to nonviolent collective resistance transformed the possibilities of political action, while his campaigns for Hindu-Muslim harmony, social equality, and the removal of Untouchable status reveal a leader continually challenging aspects of his own society. At the same time, his skepticism toward rapid industrialization and his concern for environmental sustainability connect his thinking to debates that remain remarkably contemporary.
Guha’s approach also gives the book significance beyond a conventional historical biography. By examining both the arguments Gandhi provoked and their afterlives, the book invites readers to consider how political ideas survive, evolve, and sometimes become newly relevant decades after their origin.
That makes Arguments with Gandhi particularly well positioned for readers interested not only in Gandhi and Indian history, but also in civil rights, political resistance, religion, social justice, race, gender, environmental thought, and the continuing struggle over how societies should change.
Its greatest strength may ultimately be its capacity to turn Gandhi from a historical icon into a living subject of debate. At a time when questions about political polarization, nonviolent resistance, social division, and sustainable development remain urgent, Guha’s examination offers considerable potential for meaningful discussion and for a much broader readership beyond traditional history audiences.
What makes the book particularly compelling is that it does not appear content simply to celebrate Gandhi’s achievements. Instead, its very framing around “arguments” creates room for a more dynamic examination of his political and social thought. Gandhi’s commitment to nonviolent collective resistance transformed the possibilities of political action, while his campaigns for Hindu-Muslim harmony, social equality, and the removal of Untouchable status reveal a leader continually challenging aspects of his own society. At the same time, his skepticism toward rapid industrialization and his concern for environmental sustainability connect his thinking to debates that remain remarkably contemporary.
Guha’s approach also gives the book significance beyond a conventional historical biography. By examining both the arguments Gandhi provoked and their afterlives, the book invites readers to consider how political ideas survive, evolve, and sometimes become newly relevant decades after their origin.
That makes Arguments with Gandhi particularly well positioned for readers interested not only in Gandhi and Indian history, but also in civil rights, political resistance, religion, social justice, race, gender, environmental thought, and the continuing struggle over how societies should change.
Its greatest strength may ultimately be its capacity to turn Gandhi from a historical icon into a living subject of debate. At a time when questions about political polarization, nonviolent resistance, social division, and sustainable development remain urgent, Guha’s examination offers considerable potential for meaningful discussion and for a much broader readership beyond traditional history audiences.
Review of advance copy
Decent book but if you have read Guha's the years that made Gandhi and India after Gandhi, not much more. I had hoped there would be more some interesting full text arguments between Gandhi Ji and others and then Guha's narrative but it's mainly his narrative with excerpts from Gandhi Ji, his admirers and detractors which I am not sure gives a full picture.
Review of advance copy
This book may go down as one of the most important primers in years to come for anyone who is willing to understand Gandhi and his perspective on the matters of non-violence, justice, faith and progress - and what are the counter-arguments given for the same. The audiobook narration by J Dev Haldar was top notch that kept me hooked from start to finish
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews