This book contains many of Dorothea Lange’s photographs of Japanese internment along with an essay contextualizing Lange’s work by Linda Gordon and an essay contextualizing internment and Japanese American history by Gary Y. Okhiro. The photographs are through the WSA and are in the public domain but they were impounded through the duration of the war. I recognized several of the more famous images from the books I have read about internment but many of the pictures were new to me.
Very few of the liberals and radicals of the 1930s and early 1940s critiqued the internment of Japanese Americans in internment camps. Radicals affiliated with the Communist Party wanted to prioritize a united front against fascism abroad rather than make waves about racism at home. The ACLU remained silent. Dorothea Lange and her husband Paul Taylor were outraged. They were able to arrange for Lange to photograph the internment process. As Linda Gordon suggests, the government agreed in part because Lange’s earlier photographs promoted their programs. Did they expect Lange’s work would endorse internment? At this point, a documentary record was also just part of how the government did things. It was automatic that you would have a documentary record made, even if, as in the case of Lange’s work, the photos were immediately “impounded.” Her images were not released until after the war.
I particularly appreciated Gordon’s discussion of Lange’s relationship with Ansel Adam, who was able to photograph Manzanar a year later. Anyone who has seen the images side by side will be struck by the difference in their works’ cultural politics. I hadn’t realized though that Lange has pushed Adam’s to publish his photos quickly, despite her own work being impounded. She thought it was essential that photographs of the camps get out to the public as soon as possible. After seeing the work she was, of course, disappointed. Adam’s chose to emphasize the Americaness of individuals and break down ideas of the “inscrutable” oriental by presenting scrutable individual Americans, as Creef argues so beautifully in Imaging Japanese America. In contrast, Lange, without compromising the dignity of her subjects, emphasized the barren conditions and the hardship faced by internees. Adam’s story was triumph over adversity while Lange suggested the truly horrific nature of the government program. Lange later said, “That’s Ansel . . .He gave the regular line, you know, but he wasn’t vicious about it. He’s ignorant on these matters. He isn’t acutely aware of social change. It was far for him to go, far. He felt pretty proud of himself for being such a liberal . . .on that book . . .He doesn’t know how far short it is, not yet.”
The essay by Okhiro is expertly executed. The writing is beautiful and Okhiro’s ability to succinctly discuss the history of Japanese American immigration to the United States, the history of racism they faced, the leading causes of internment, the relationship between Japanese American populations in Hawaii with California, Oregon, and Washington, and the details of internment is impressive. Through stories of individuals and the use of moving quotations Okhiro brings this history to life for the reader. It is an essay I might use to provide students with a quick history of Japanese Americans in the United States in a class where we have little time to dwell on this but the context is important to provide. I particularly was engaged by the discussion of the internment of community leaders following Pearl Harbor in Hawaii as I knew comparatively little of this history. I had not read before about the treatment of those interned on Sand Island.
As is more commonly known, the mass internment of Japanese Americans that occurred along the West Coast did not occur in Hawaii where Japanese Americans were too significant of a population to remove. That does not mean the situation was one of racial harmony as community leaders there were picked up immediately following Pearl Harbor, as Okhiro describes it, “These ‘hostages,’ those responsible for the nation’s security believed, would ensure the docility of the masses, summon their loyalty, and coerce their productive labor toward the winning of the Pacific war and, as they depicted it, the clash of empires and civilizations and the final triumph of white supremacy” (54). The conditions on Sand Island were horrific, as with many of the detention centers for Issei. Throughout the war, Japanese Americans (especially elderly Issei) died from lack of medical care. I cried reading about pregnant women who gave birth on wooden tables in horse stalls and a father and newspaper man from San Francisco who died of a series of strokes while interned for the crime of being a community leader (never seeing his family again). I can only imagine how terrifying it is to be giving birth to your first child without proper medical care, midwives, or hospitals, with no idea how long you will be interned, whether you will be deported to Japan, or what type of life your child will have. And yet this seems among the least of indignities suffered (and that people continue to suffer with US detention policies). As Misuyo Nakamura stated upon leaving her house, “I was so worried about what the future held for my children! We had struggled for many years, but we could lose everything. I was so frightened I actually did not think we would come home alive” (66).
Okhiro also emphasized the legacy of resistance to internment and briefly touches upon Redress.