I've marked this as read, although I've left two and a half chapters unread. I like overview books because they often bring up writers or philosophers that I may have missed along the way, or frame ideas in a different way that challenges my own. The first four chapters of this book (the ones I've read) do a good job at introducing works that may be of further interest. The best chapter by far is on the fragment, sadly, for me it was the last chapter. I will read ideas on God written in a philosophical vein, ideas that give good argument for or against for the sake of the argument, however it appears that Mr. Hart's whole focus is to demonstrate how the latter stages of modernism and all of postmodernism have been in preparation for a time when people are ready to revive Nietzsche's dead one. Personally, (and I'll admit that this a somewhat close-minded viewpoint) I feel that when contemporary writers introduce Christian dogma into philosophical overviews, the point is to "witness" to new initiates of Philosophy who may be looking for "answers." By somehow relating a shedding faith to contemporary ideas, the writer seems to be attempting to say "but look how fresh religion is! Look at how open and unplumbed it all is! Stay here. Sure, have your ideas, read your Marx and Foucault, but..." Basically, "don't leave us behind." Call me a spoil sport, but this is one I won't be finishing.