Reading the fictional book Kaikeyi made me curious about the Ramayana, so when I saw this book on a book shelf I picked it up, simply as a result of convenience and not really any particular affinity towards the author.
His narration of the Ramayana is quite basic and even someone like me who is not well versed with it would be familiar with 80% of the stories narrated. The more interesting part is the interpretation of these stories.
Patnaik attempts to explain the Ramayanas concept of dharma and how it forms the basis of ancient civilization from a Hindu point of view, with Ram at the center of it all as the ideal man upholding dharma. If one keeps time in perspective, that is how ancient the literature and the civilization being spoken about is, the society and structure do sort of make sense. Roles, rules, and traditions structure and organize society in at attempt to achieve a civil world. One where animal instinct is curbed and the intellect reigns. The four yugas, the four sections of society, the various reincarnations of Vishnu, all weave an intricate web of infinity, which he simplifies and presents well.
Viewing Ram in his various roles, Patnaik attempts to show us how the Ramayana give us perspective of times when dharma towards different people/aspects of life is in conflict and also how it provides guidance for decision making, with Ram as an example of the ideal.
The Ramayana places an individual as an integral but small part of society. It raises individual consciousness to not just think about how actions and decisions impact oneself but society as a whole. It asks that all people conduct themselves keeping their role in society (dharma) in mind, thus maintaining the essence of this system, which only works if everyone adheres to it. It preaches placing dharma above base instinct when decision making, thus ensuring the balance and continuance and good of society, hence raising one’s level of spirituality and awareness, while maintaining the fabric of civilization. That really is the crux of Ramayana, and the reason it is still relevant in today’s day and age, despite the declining relevance of the Vedic society structure.
This connectedness of people and an elevated consciousness should really be the take away from Ramayana IMHO.
I do like his take on the four society sections, which are not meant to be arranged as a pyramid of power, but rather as an essential spoke of a wheel, necessary for its functioning, and purely for the purpose of vocational organization.
Side note — It would be a mistake to view this system in a modern world with a 1 is to 1 translation. The capabilities and avenues to contribute to society of women and men is vastly different in a modern world compared to an ancient one. And hence as every systems effectiveness is defined by context, I believe the organizers of this society structure couldn’t adapt to the rapidly changing context of the world. That combined with the distortion of these basic structures by those in positions of power, whose dharma was to protect others, but misuse and greed, lead to weakened relevance of this system in the modern world. —
Having said that, Patnaik and I agree and believe the spiritual depth of these texts and the essence of their message is invaluable, when interpreted correctly in the right context. Evidence lies in the fact that these tales still persist, having stood through the toughest test of time, and still give people of an entire subcontinent a sense of identity and culture. How many things can one say that about.
As a woman one will definitely have beef with Patnaiks interpretation using a metaphor comparing man to a farmer and woman as his field to plough or neglect. More so because I can’t fathom that the wise creators of such complex texts and systems would fail to see that any system where man and woman are not equal partners would not be sustainable. Yes, women would hold soft power, that I can understand. There are versions of the Ramayana that speak of Sita being the power behind Ram. I would rather believe that interpretation.
I can’t say the book was super impactful to me, but it was informative wrt the Vedic world. So yeah read it if you want a short, easy to read, introduction to the Vedic world and to Ramayana.
Phew, that was a long review.