What do you think?
Rate this book
A History of the Early Church
This is the standard history in two volumes of the development of the early Christian Church, ranging from the ministry of John the Baptist to the establishment of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th century.
1200 pages, Paperback
First published June 1, 1993
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
August 2, 2012
Note: This review is only for Volume 3 ("From Constantine to Julian").
Several years back, on a used book shelf at Washington D.C.'s "Icon and Book Service," I ran across Volume 2 of Hans Lietzmann's History of the Early Church. That volume (a Meridian reissue) comprised two volumes of Lietzmann's 4 volume set. I think it cost me about $5. What a deal! I'm currently scouring Amazon's used book sales for Volume 1. Anyway, back to the book. As histories go, this pretty dense stuff. I took me quite a while to read it, but if you'r into this sort of thing (late antiquity, church history), it's a real gem. First off, the style is first rate. For readability I would rank this history right up there with Peter Brown's The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph & Diversity 200-1000 and Gibbon's (without the anti-Christian snark) The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. The fact that these books are translations by Betram Lee Woolf is, given the flow of the prose, is simply astounding. I don't know much about Leitzmann. I believe he was Lutheran, who had a fondness for archaeology as well as some recent biblical scholarship. But grounded in a way that I feel comfortable with. And, given this cast of characters, an appropriate sense of humor. Oh, there's some dead spots that had my eyes glazing over (What's a Meletian? Which Eusebius is he talking about?). But when Lietzmann gets going with the major characters such as Constantine, Athanasius (a first rate political and church infighter), Julian the Apostate (called "Billy Goat" by his enemies), and others, I found myself thinking of this as a straight forward history writing effort.
But if you're into the nitty gritty of Church development, there's plenty here to enjoy. Lietzmann goes into great, and fascinating, detail when it comes the particulars of the Arian controversy, the divide between East and West (much sooner than I originally thought), the cult of the Saints, the strange history of Christmas and Epiphany, etc. If you like this sort of thing, this book is a real treasure. Highly recommended. (I may add to this review as I read the other volumes.)
March 14, 2021
For more reviews and the 1001 Books Spreadsheet, visit http://arukiyomi.com
This is a rare four-volume set focussing on the history of the Christian church from the time of the apostles through to … well, when Lietzmann died in 1942 with the unfinished manuscript sat all over his desk. I picked them up in a charity bookshop in Barnard Castle, where I was having my eyes tested during the Covid pandemic. OK the bit about the eye test wasn’t true, but the rest was.
The timeline runs to about 400 AD and thus takes in a huge span of very important history which would change the face of the world forever. In spanning four volumes (now published in two), it runs to some 1200 pages in length and while that is, by anyone except Proust’s system of measurement, a long book, it doesn’t feel very long considering the amount of history packed into those 400 years of church history,
In fact, Lietzmann does what all good historians should do when they begin a history and that is not to begin at the so-called ‘beginning’ but rather well before it so that we can get a running start when Jesus appears on the scene.
To that end, Lietzmann takes us as far back as the origins of Palestine Judaism as formed out of the crucible of the return of the exiled Jews to Jerusalem under Ezra with its Messianic hope expressed in the Psalms and prophetic writings of Isaiah and others.
What is at once a strength of the volumes is what some readers would also consider Lietzmann’s weakness. He writes with great fluidity and range. Thoughts, personalities, writings, historical trends, cultural insights, all of these flow one into another in a great flood of information. At times it feels more proselike than you would expect from church history.
And thus, this is not a history book where you will find the names of, say, a Roman emperor with his dates neatly appended in parenthesis. No, no. You will find said Roman emperor sketched lightly in pencil in one section, returned to later to be filled in with pen and ink and then, later still perhaps even in another volume entirely, to be rendered in vivid watercolours.
For example, you will discover all you need to know about Clement of Alexandria and his writings, but you will need to read a great deal do so – he is indexed in all four volumes. And while this means the writing is as vivid and multilayered as real life and historical narrative, it does mean you may well come away from 1200 pages of reading wondering if you can actually remember anything about Clement of Alexandria at all, let alone how he differs from Clement of Rome.
To say Lietzmann is verbose would be unfair. His prose presents history probably unlike anything else you may have read and it does an excellent job of making it all very real. The writing weaves the philosophies of characters together with their surroundings and their many influences into a veritable Gordian Narrative.
It’s not hard to see that it’s precisely because of this that you will probably not find these on shelves today. They lack the clarity useful for the scholar and the brevity useful for the layperson. While I’m very grateful for Lietzmann’s work and the fact that I have read them, I will keep them only to provide me with more colourful context when I wish to look up a particular individual or school of thought from these centuries.
Lietzmann died leaving the manuscript unfinished. A note at the end of the fourth volume testifies
It probably didn’t help that, at the time, he was 90 pages into a chapter on monasticism which was already the longest chapter in the entire work. Quite where he was planning to go next is unclear.
Nevertheless, his journey to that point is still worth a read to anyone, like myself, who considers themselves to be somewhere between a layperson and a scholar when it comes to the early history of the Christian church.
This is a rare four-volume set focussing on the history of the Christian church from the time of the apostles through to … well, when Lietzmann died in 1942 with the unfinished manuscript sat all over his desk. I picked them up in a charity bookshop in Barnard Castle, where I was having my eyes tested during the Covid pandemic. OK the bit about the eye test wasn’t true, but the rest was.
The timeline runs to about 400 AD and thus takes in a huge span of very important history which would change the face of the world forever. In spanning four volumes (now published in two), it runs to some 1200 pages in length and while that is, by anyone except Proust’s system of measurement, a long book, it doesn’t feel very long considering the amount of history packed into those 400 years of church history,
In fact, Lietzmann does what all good historians should do when they begin a history and that is not to begin at the so-called ‘beginning’ but rather well before it so that we can get a running start when Jesus appears on the scene.
To that end, Lietzmann takes us as far back as the origins of Palestine Judaism as formed out of the crucible of the return of the exiled Jews to Jerusalem under Ezra with its Messianic hope expressed in the Psalms and prophetic writings of Isaiah and others.
What is at once a strength of the volumes is what some readers would also consider Lietzmann’s weakness. He writes with great fluidity and range. Thoughts, personalities, writings, historical trends, cultural insights, all of these flow one into another in a great flood of information. At times it feels more proselike than you would expect from church history.
And thus, this is not a history book where you will find the names of, say, a Roman emperor with his dates neatly appended in parenthesis. No, no. You will find said Roman emperor sketched lightly in pencil in one section, returned to later to be filled in with pen and ink and then, later still perhaps even in another volume entirely, to be rendered in vivid watercolours.
For example, you will discover all you need to know about Clement of Alexandria and his writings, but you will need to read a great deal do so – he is indexed in all four volumes. And while this means the writing is as vivid and multilayered as real life and historical narrative, it does mean you may well come away from 1200 pages of reading wondering if you can actually remember anything about Clement of Alexandria at all, let alone how he differs from Clement of Rome.
To say Lietzmann is verbose would be unfair. His prose presents history probably unlike anything else you may have read and it does an excellent job of making it all very real. The writing weaves the philosophies of characters together with their surroundings and their many influences into a veritable Gordian Narrative.
It’s not hard to see that it’s precisely because of this that you will probably not find these on shelves today. They lack the clarity useful for the scholar and the brevity useful for the layperson. While I’m very grateful for Lietzmann’s work and the fact that I have read them, I will keep them only to provide me with more colourful context when I wish to look up a particular individual or school of thought from these centuries.
Lietzmann died leaving the manuscript unfinished. A note at the end of the fourth volume testifies
Here ends the manuscript as Hans Lietzmann left it at his death on June 25th, 1942.
It probably didn’t help that, at the time, he was 90 pages into a chapter on monasticism which was already the longest chapter in the entire work. Quite where he was planning to go next is unclear.
Nevertheless, his journey to that point is still worth a read to anyone, like myself, who considers themselves to be somewhere between a layperson and a scholar when it comes to the early history of the Christian church.
September 12, 2017
So far only read the first volume = The Beginnings of the Christian Church. Has some basic historical information, but even that was very thin on the ground. Basically had nothing insightful to share except some fanciful theorizing about divisions between Paul and others. Very much out of its era of faith denying German theologians
Want to Read
February 21, 2012Recommended by Steve H., who has great review of it.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews