Sober social science as profound moral critique.
How did Johnson manage to sound so calm when writing this book? It is only very occasionally that the careful, measured, almost-too-colourless-but-actually-just-what-the-subject-needs, scholarly prose slips and the deep emotion appears. I certainly did not manage to stay calm when reading it. I was thoroughly shaken, occasionally shouted at the book, annotated it in anger, fought back tears, and again am in awe of the abused and put-upon Chinese peasant and stunned by the inhumanity of the bureacracy that runs this place and how the system warps its agents.
The book builds on decades of research (various slices of which were presented in the even calmer essay collection "Wanting a daughter, needing a son" a decade earlier), thousands of interviews with parents who relinquished children and parents who adopted them (contrary to the myths, most adoptive parents of "abandoned" Chinese children are Chinese), with other relatives, government officials and orphanage officials. Johnson demonstrates how the Party's population control policies (what a euphemism) and their enforcement apparatus -- and not the mythical patriarchy of 'Chinese culture' and the lamentable 'backwardness' of the rural population and other convenient scapegoats -- led to the death and abandonment and traumatising of millions of children and to lasting damage to the millions of adults involved.
[There is of couse much to be said about patriarchy and development levels and attitudes and so on in China, but these things are not to blame for the destruction and upheavals and tragedies that Johnson and many other scholars and journalists have written about. At most, in some parts of the country they were background factors, but they would never have come into play without the one-child policy and its fundamental injustuces - state coercion of fertility and the concomitent manufacture of illegal babies (just think about that concept for a moment) designated a problem by their own society, demanding punishment (of whoever was caught with them, and of themselves) destined to live (if they managed to live) without citizenship in the country of their birth. And all presided over by a Party that explicitly and loudly (yes, very loudly, I live here) and continuously proclaims itself the moral guardian and teacher of its people.]