Where to start? I had a lot of issues with the idea of this story as well as the writing style. At first I found it interesting that someone would use their imagination to create a story based on those African-I-have-millions-waiting-for-you emails. Do people still get those? How people ever fell for them, fall for them, I have no clue. Let me be blunt: I didn’t like Tammy, at all! So was so gullible, stupid, annoying, stupid, living in denial, stupid… I mean how did she make it to however old she is? The author wasn’t expecting readers/listeners to like Tammy, did she? How? She and the town were way too unbelievable! I can’t put all the stupidity on her though because the townsfolk were almost as stupid. The fact she ends up getting the money just makes this story over the top, in my opinion. It’s just too unbelievable.
1. She believes she’s getting millions from some unknown African person in Africa.
2. She tries to hide this fact from those around her.
3. They find out and essentially beg to get a portion of it in exchange for some handouts in the meantime.
4. WITHOUT asking for proof!
5. Why didn’t those who wanted a part of the millions not have enough common sense to wait for the millions to come, instead giving Tammy hundreds here, thousands there?
6. “Once a Tyree always a Tyree.” So why were people offering her money if she was a Tyree? Hello!? How many times was the fact she was a Tyree brought up in a negative connotation? Many times!
It just baffled my mind.
BUT THEN!!!
1. Her cousin Lonny pops up. The criminal with a past.
2. Starts spreading lies about her and how she treats Jar and her scam about the millions.
3. WITHOUT any proof! It was Lonny against Tammy. Even the grocery store lady had no proof that Tammy did anything.
4. Everyone (minus Leo and the library lady) believes HIM! Not her who has never had issues with the law.
5. The social worker believes HIM! Even though Lonny has no proof that Tammy was abusing (really abusing) Jar.
6. The sheriff or whatever he was believes HIM! Again, a criminal who’s always getting into trouble over an innocent, in all sense of the word, person.
Again… Mind blown!
BUT THEN!!!
1. The cop shows up and Tammy thinks he’s going to help her.
2. Nope, he thinks Tammy (a young, very naïve woman) is a ringleader of… something?!
3. Even after hearing Lonny’s confession, he’s all eager to arrest her. What?
4. In the end, Tammy magically gets the money (where did the African guy get it? Why did he choose her?) and stays in the same town where everyone was against her except Leo and the library lady. No sense there!
While the narrator had a great accent for country-bumpkin Tammy, I can see her being limited in what she can narrate. Now, I don’t know if she can talk without the accent or not but… Overall, I wasn’t a fan because there was too much pausing between words and/or talking slowly, leaving me with the impression of someone just learning to read.
Questions/Comments:
I had a hard time with Jar’s “speech,” his sound effects he’d do instead of actually talk. I was believing that Tammy could understand or pick up on what he was saying based on what was going on in the scene, the fact they’d been together for years. I have a daughter with autism and whenever she speaks to someone (the majority of the time), they’ll look to me questioning what she was saying. Well that stopped when I realized that whenever he said “Okay dokey” and what he meant, per Tammy’s translation, it was completely different almost each time. Sorry but no. On another note, I’d be curious to know how the author wrote his dialogue given some of the “words” sounded more like sounds or noises.
There were issues with the dialogue tags. I’m all about dialogue tags if anyone who reads my reviews (does anyone read these or am I just talking/typing to myself?) should pick up on. For example, there was a time when Tammy “whined.” Then she spoke. Then Tammy “whined” again. Or when Tammy describes the jail guard as someone who “looks kindly.” The guard then talks, and it ends with “She says kindly.” See what I mean. I can’t stand stuff like this. There were other instances; these were just two I took note of. What about simple dialogue tags? I said. He said. She said. When there was only Tammy in the scene and “I said” was used… so… many… times! Those were so overdone throughout this story. The author seemed to choose unnecessary simple dialogue tags as opposed to using them with an action (which would have been better) or just not using them in general. It was crazy!
After experiencing the fun that is social services, after telling the caseworker she was innocent and getting Jar taken away, how in the hell did she believe that if she told the police officers when she was arrested for stealing and fraud that she was innocent that they’d let her go? That made no sense! Wouldn’t that be a contradiction to her stupidity?
I found it hilarious (in a negative way) that the author would have thrown in the word “cogitate” as in “[Tammy] I cogitate for hours.” Maybe I’m the stupid one because that seems like a “big” word in my opinion, one too big when used in reference to Tammy or this story for that matter.
The pre-arresting email she sent to the African doctor was ridiculous! I mean how stupid can she be when she hasn’t heard from him in how long? I have no clue. Yet, she still believes he’s sending her millions. This unknown person in a faraway country. Yeah… makes sense.
I was under the impression that Spring was a small country-type town. So when I heard that there were prostitutes who had pimps in this town… Yeah, it didn’t add up to me.
I received a free audiobook in exchange for an honest review.
Please tell me I'm not the only one who didn't like this story....