Labour history is interesting as it gives you a perspective of the past that is not based on royalty but a past of normal people. E.J. Hobsbawm’s Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour mainly focuses on a period of history based on the Industrial Revolution. There is special attention to the Industrial Revolution within the British Isles. The book looks at how labour developed in Britain over the Industrial Revolution. It is based on multiple essays on the subject written from a Marxist-history perspective.
There are lots of different ideas that give a unique perspective within the book. For starters, the first essay, “The Machine Breakers”, is based on the Luddites. Rather than arguing that Luddism was a rebellion against machinery, Hobsbawm argued that the destruction of machinery was a labour tactic designed to get better negotiated settlements, requiring 12000 soldiers to suppress their rioting. As argued by Hobsbawm, Luddites were, for the most part, sympathised with by society at large. This challenges the usual assumption that they were disliked for their industrial sabotage.
Lots of different ideas are looked at through Labouring Men’s different chapters. In his essay on Methodism, Hobsbawm argued that there was a mixed impact on whether Methodism had an impact on reducing revolution, given that only 25 percent of people attended churches in parts of the UK, particularly in the iron and steel towns. Religion had a negligible impact on the corn riots than otherwise demonstrated. Tramping, a term that became synonymous with homeless people, was a strong tendency of younger men who would travel and was connected with parts of union development.
Hobsbawm challenges the assumptions that early industrialisation led to a rise in living standards. Using consumption metrics of tobacco and sugar, alongside the livestock statistics, Hobsbawm argues that between 1790 and 1850, there was a reduction in living standards for the average person. There is rejection in the assumption that living standards were improved, unlike various economists who argue that this period in time led to improvements in living standards. Hobsbawm also takes the concentrated analysis of different working-class professions, including the gas industry and the dockside industry. The gas industry, Hobsbawm argues, had improvements in living standards in the majority of the UK, except in certain places. Another industry he looked at was the waterside docking industry, which involved many highly specialised jobs. The other intriguing analysis was the idea of the “labour aristocracy” in which certain jobs in the skilled working class were considerably higher paid than other working-class jobs
There was an analysis of the politics of the era. Hyndman’s SDF or Social Democratic Federation was a grouping of socialists made up of atheists and radicals. The Social Democratic Federation was dictatorially led by Hyndman, which echoes that Communists of the 20th century and their desire for power. The Fabian organisation was looked at as an ineffective organisation in changing public minds to socialism. That said, I did find it interesting to see so many clergy in the Fabian organisation. They were the second most common profession among the middle classes in the Fabians.
Labouring Men is a classic on understanding labour history in 20th-century Britain. The research is impressive as it has multiple primary sources used throughout the different essays. Even today, there is a lot of information that can be acquired from this book about industrial labour relations. 4 stars.