I may get accused of being anti-patriotic for this opinion cuz really, who doesn't like a book by a guy who is an elite member of a CAF sniper team, gets his legs blown off while serving his country, then comes home to run a half marathon on prosthetic legs, gets 2nd place in a reality show, cures himself of Oxy addiction, and basically moves himself through therapy and rehab single-handedly?
Well, me.
This was the November choice for my book club. Disclaimer: all of the members of my club are spouses of serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces. I think this was the book choice in part because most of the military spouses of my fellow clubbers already owned it.
I didn't really know Jody's story before reading his book (I don't watch tv, didn't follow the election campaign for his City of Ottawa seat). Clearly he has what it takes to be successful in whatever he puts his mind to and I respect his determination and drive. He's also brought important attention to the state of the CAF and injured soldiers. But, I couldn't shake a growing dislike for the guy and while my opinion of the author should have no bearing on the topic, that distaste affected my opinion of the book.
First, the book itself is a quick, easy read but I thought it would have benefited from an merciless edit job.
I acknowledge he was an exceptionally skilled member of an elite team of fighters and consequently enjoyed special status among the ranks, but I'd had enough of his self-congratulations 1/2 way through the book. "First thing we snipers did ..." "We snipers were allowed certain freedoms ... " "Snipers have the ability to turn off their emotions ... " "us snipers don't get PTSD" (seriously?? This one makes me particularly annoyed. This totally blames the victim among the ranks - so if my spouse struggles with PTSD, it's because he can't separate himself from the events as Jody claims?) I understand his need to maintain his military and sniper identity that gave him status at one time but OMG it got tiring.
I understand that I'm an outsider to military thinking and that they are trained to kill, but the descriptions of "longest kills" bothered me on a fundamental level. I can't help but think of the life gone on the other end of that bullet, and to them it's a contest, about setting a record. I know they are trained to do this and they do what they do to protect human life, and that thinking alters when you are being fired on in return. I truly respect and support the need to be in conflict zones and do what is necessary. I also recognize they need to think this way in order to not lose it mentally themselves, and that this sort of contest among soldiers is as old as armed conflict itself. I know all that. But still ... call me a bleeding heart liberal, I found the descriptions of it all as a "contest" and "breaking a record" hard to get past.
I also found it odd that he took such care to omit last names of his crew and cover eyes in the photos, but gave detailed descriptions of the events of one particularly horrific day in Afghanistan, including names and conditions of the bodies of deceased Canadian soldiers. I'd find that pretty hard if I were a family member of the deceased.
What I was looking forward to in this book was a description of his drive to succeed translated to his recovery post-injury and create change in the system, and the book fell short on this. For me, the book started on page 201 (out of 229 pages) when he started describing his recovery. In spite of my complaining above, the first part of the book was interesting and made me respect CAF members even more for what they go through on overseas deployments as well as here at home. I know that 98% of his readership will buy the book for exactly all the descriptions of fighting and military life. But I think if he really wants to create change for returning injured veterans, he missed his chance by failing to describe more fully his experience on return and *why* that demonstrates the need for change, and what could be done to actually create change in the system.