This book would make a very good thesis. It definitely reads as such. The stories were very powerful and definitely enlightening of how it was to be queer in 1970s-1990s. However, it is VERY repetitive. Every essay/oral interview discusses the same topics: it discuss the same organizations that were creating in this era, discusses the same issues and problems these organizations faced, discusses the same challenges of the AIDs epidemic, and discusses the same events. Yes, at first it is very interesting. But after the first or second story, it is just too repetitive. I really wanted to learn more about individual stories and see how each persons journey differentiated from the other but most were just too similar. I also wanted to learn more about modern day issues and successes of being queer and latino/a in America. Additionally, I know this book is aimed specifically for queer latino/as, but the whole point of the book is for LGBT+ activism to be more intersectional. So with that being said, if their goal is to gain more intersectionalism, I wanted to be able to hear stories of Black queer people or even MORE stories of trans people and people who identify as bisexual during this era. Just feels like they contradicted their own goal. Overall, decent read but not the best. There’s definitely better books to read that discuss queer brown voices.