Kannathil Muthamittaal was on TV last week, a rare Tamil movie that has aged graciously. It prompted me to pick up Ummath, a Sri Lankan Tamil novel by Sharmila Seyyid that is about Tamil women in post-war Sri Lanka. Most Tamil coverage of the Eelam war from India has centered around men; it also emerged from a place of unquestioned loyalty to the Tigers and no alternate views were aired.
Ummath vapourized the aura of holiness surrounding the image of the Tigers and revealed their flaws and crimes. The massacre of Muslims, forced recruitment of children and teenagers, murder of ex-members, using vulnerable people as a shield against the military - I wasn't aware of any of these facts about the Tigers before reading Ummath. By recording the stories of women from a wide array of backgrounds - from Muslim women to ex-Tigers to war widows and women handicapped by war, it highlighted the bleak nature of the world these women were pushed to, where even the basic needs of food, shelter and clothing weren't guaranteed. On top of nursing the wounds inflicted by war, rural Muslim women had to face religious extremists and sheer misogyny while trying to scrape a livelihood. It is one of the most devastating novels I've read so far, and it is exceptionally haunting because the situations portrayed in the novel are not changing anytime soon.
My interest in this subject remained unabated even after completing Ummath, so I picked up This Divided Island because I wanted a nonfictional account of the war and its aftermath. Samanth, in his brilliant prose, lays out the cause, course and consequences of the war. The enormous tragedy and the human cost of war is conveyed with empathy through haunting anecdotes and insightful analysis with a clear head, without succumbing to sentimentality or bias.
This Divided Island gives a complete history (political and people's) of the racial tensions in Sri Lanka and the civil war and ethnic cleansings it led to. It also provides a crucial account of the aftermath of war - material, political and cultural oppression that Tamils are being subject to. The war claimed thousands of Tamil lives, civilian and Tigers, and caused severe physical injuries to thousands more. Surviving Tamils in Sri Lanka, in addition to coping with the physical and emotional trauma left behind by decades of war, have to deal with missing friends and family who may never be accounted for, blatant discrimination by the government that is engaged in the destruction of Tamil monuments all over the country, crippling poverty and no external aid whatsoever.
In his introduction, Samanth writes:
"I went to Sri Lanka to discover what became of life before, during, and after the decades of war, and to find out what the conflict had done to the country's soul."
That sums up the book pretty well. It does not provide a linear narrative of war. There is no detailed statistics, no tabulated toll where we learn X no. of Tamils died, Y no. of Sinhalese civilians died or Z no. of soldiers died. It's a more unstructured history and it evolves with his journies. He travels to different parts of Sri Lanka to visit places of wartime significance or to meet people affected by the war, and the history is non-linearly pieced together.
The book begins with Samanth landing in Sri Lanka 2 years after the war. He finds a nation in the grip of perpetual wariness and petty celebrations by the majoritarian forces. The right-wing government has won the war and they are eager to assert their victory by erasing Tamil from signboards and official announcements, demolishing Hindu monuments and by "disappearing" anyone who dares to raise their voice against its criminal acts. Democracy has become a mere concept and individual freedom is granted according to the whims of the state.
"All Sri Lanka was wary; this was a country perpetually steeling itself for bad news. The war had made it this way: the agonizing longevity of the fighting; the Tigers' sneaky guerilla tactics; the manner in which the army had finished the war, rampaging through Tigers and Tamil civilians without distinction; the government's excesses in the two years since its victory. In such an inflamed atmosphere, rumor prompted quick violence and tragic consequences."
"Sri Lanka was a country pretending that it had been suddenly scrubbed clean of violence. But it wasn't, of course. By some fundamental law governing the conservation of violence, it was now erupting outside the battlefield, in strange and unpredictable ways."
The notion of sustained war in a Buddhist nation is frankly ridiculous to me, and the Sri Lankan war just goes to prove that no religion, no matter how peaceful, is capable of containing the human tendency for violence and majoritarianism.
"The Sinhalese like to think of their Buddhism as muscular. Their faith had seeded and nourished itself in Sri Lanka, and it had proved hardly enough to thrive here, even as it crumbled under the weight of Hinduism in India, the land of its birth… Sinhalese Buddhism is a coiled and wary creature, its reflex always to be aggressive in defence. Since 2006, when the Sri Lankan government had started winning the war, and after its victory in 2009, this ready Buddhist aggression had fused with military triumphalism."
The civil unrest between Tamils and Sinhalese originated in the 50s when the government passed the Sinhala Only Act making it the sole official language. Tamils were historically viewed as outsiders by the Sinhalese majority and open discrimination by the government added fuel to the fire. The succeeding events are quickly summarised in the timeline at the beginning of the book. Samanth traces the origins of this unrest as far back as the late 19th century. He even points out the anti-Tamil sentiment in Sri Lanka's equivalent of Mahabharata, an ancient Buddhist work.
"The schisms between the country's various ethnicities started to dilate - coaxed in no modest measure by the British, who had already divided and ruled India with such efficiency. Novel ways were discovered to emphasize differences and even to define identity, to dice finer and finer the peoples contained within this small island."
After the independence of Sri Lanka in 1948, the Sinhalese resentment of Tamils arose due to the fact that a large number of Tamils occupied positions at the universities and civil services due to their English education, and this intolerance gradually escalated through riots and open discrimination by the government into a full blown civil war in the 80s. There were many different Tamil fractions intent on leading the war, but LTTE remained as the ultimate proponent of war, partly due to its ferocity in the cause and partly because it decimated all the other rival Tamil groups.
The Tigers, usually glorified in the Tamil mainstream media, come out as very ruthless, unethical and unprincipled in Samanth's neutral account. Their personal agendas and thirst for violence seem to frequently eclipse their pure ideological motivation, and based on some of their actions, they come across as every bit as power-hungry and intolerant as their Sinhalese oppressors themselves. They also seem eager to preserve the hierarchies of caste and this does not sit in ideological harmony with their dream of an ideal Tamil state where everyone is treated as an equal. LTTE is also criticized for forced parting of families, kidnapping of children and teenagers to populate its army and using civilians as a shield against the military.
"He (Prabhakaran) killed Tigers who disagreed with him, and he ordered killed Tamils who resisted him, Sinhalese civilians and politicians. No one was off limits: not pacifists, not women or children, not the weak."
The military atrocities, public lynchings and race riots leading to the war are chronicled in great detail. The crimes committed against the Tamil public, both by the Sri Lankan military and the LTTE are given equal coverage. The narrative is peppered with several quirky anecdotes about the course of war.
Minor gripes: The military using chemical warfare against civilians in the late stage of the war wasn't given enough attention. I sometimes wished it were more linear and had some pictures. The map present at the beginning could have been more detailed.
A very well-written, affecting account of the Sri Lankan war, approached from all sides with nuance. A must-read if you are interested in the aftermath of war. This book is not to be taken as the definitive history on the subject as it doesn't seem complete, but it is very credible in whatever it offers.