I have been studying Revelation, and some of my commentaries have noted a rising hostility between Jews and Christians following the catastrophe of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. So, I thought that this book might help me to better understand the history of those dynamics. While the book obliquely addresses this issue in discussing the origins of rabbinic Judaism at Yavneh following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., it covers a lot more ground that that:
• While acknowledging that rabbinic Judaism was without question the heir of the Pharisees, he also points out the shear diversity within Second Temple Judaism (Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, various forms of Hellenistic Judaism within the Diaspora) and makes a case that Christianity, originally viewed as a sect of the Jews, was a rightful heir to that diversity.
• Using various primary sources, Dr. Dunn describes the diversity of Jewish sects within Christianity. Sects such as the Ebionites rejected the divinity of Christ while holding to a strong view of the Torah. Conversely, there were other Jewish Christians who held to a high Christology while still maintaining a Jewish identity by attending synagogue services and holding to other Jewish traditions. Christian bishops hated this and ultimately rooted such practices out of the church. Like Dr. Dunn, I consider this to have been a grave mistake that probably contributed to deep-seated hostility between the church and the Jews. Interestingly enough, such a version of Christianity has been restored in recent decades with the Messianic Christian movement, a prominent member of which is Rabbi Jonathan Cahn.
• Just as Messianic Christians have their early church fore-runner, so do charismatic movements such as the Pentecostals in the Montanist movement that started in Phrygia and may well have been inspired by the book of Revelation. Ultimately, the Montanists were deemed heretical on account of their use of prophets and prophetesses to add to the first-century apostolic scriptures.
• Dr. Dunn also spends a lot of time in Gnostic texts such as those found at Nag Hammadi. One point he effectively makes is that Gnosticism wasn’t Christianity. Sects such as Messianic Christianity and Montanism were outgrowths of Christianity, but Gnosticism had the feel of an outside teaching grafted onto Christian doctrines that just happened to have some similarity to it.
As noted above, Dr. Dunn spends a lot of time in early Christian texts, not just the New Testament, which also gets a lot of attention as a primary source. This really impressed me and motivates me to read more of the apostolic and early church fathers (I had previously read the Didache and the Martyrdom of Polycarp.) to better understand that time period of the church as well as its apologetics methods in a hostile environment. Current trends of militant secularism in our own society increasingly suggest parallels to the second century church.