I received this novel from the author in exchange for a review. I do love the feeling of a book finding me, rather than the other way around.
‘Scales: Of Justice’ is the third in a series of interconnected books, but given my that I’ve done it, can easily be read without any prior knowledge of what’s gone on with the characters from the other books.
Paris arrives at a weeklong workshop in the hope of moving on from some pretty devastating past events. Her brother Sean met the love of his life at a previous workshop, and they apparently had a great time exploring and overcoming their respective traumas. Paris is a little hopeful that she’ll get to do the same: move on, and find love. But when she’s confronted with a man from a past she’s trying desperately to let go, she starts questioning whether she’s ready to move on, or whether the best approach would be to run.
Weaver is studying psychology, and wants to write and publish a paper about the workshop. But when Weaver meets Paris, he’s forced to acknowledge that he’s not fully recovered from what’s buried in his past, and he starts questioning whether he’ll ever be ready for his chosen career.
Paris and Weaver are paired up on a project for the workshop, with the theme of justice. The word resonates with Paris because of something in her past, but I didn’t quite get it as a theme associated with mental health. Justice leads me to expect a discussion of justice vs. right vs. fair, or a discussion of the legal or social constructs of justice. I couldn’t quite work this into psychology, because isn’t the personal about what we each perceive as fair? For example, it would be both right and just for me to get a speeding ticket if I was speeding, but I can’t imagine that I would ever consider it to be fair.
Paris and Weaver are attracted to each other, but their relationship has an uneven start, when Weaver reveals he sees his role in the workshop as observer, rather than participant.
This is a book where the characters spend a lot of time thinking about the past, and what it’s doing to them in the present. This is not an eventful story. It’s introspective. There’s lots of contemplation followed by talking.
Paris spends a lot of time on her past and not sleeping and thinking she looks like an absolute wreck. However, she wasn’t overwhelmingly self-pitying, and she wanted to do what she could to fix herself. She felt strong and sympathetic.
Weaver quickly moves past attempting to be Paris’s therapist, and spends a lot of time thinking about how strong and self-aware Paris is, but with a vulnerability that has him wanting to help her. While it’s not a competition, his big problem isn’t as big as Paris’s big problem, and he seemed to have mostly overcome it.
I got a bit tense about where the story was going to go at times. I’m all for people properly committing to sorting themselves out without relying on the magical kiss, but I don’t want to think that maybe the characters are confusing therapy with emotional intimacy. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen here.
At times I missed some of the drama and conflict of romances that rely on the ‘I don’t want to want to touch you’ conflict to keep the hero and heroine apart. The romantic conflict between Paris and Weaver is minimal, but there’s a good sense of growing attraction, growing intimacy, and some really nice examples of wanting to do what’s best for the other person, even if that means making a difficult choice. Paris and Weaver seemed like nice, normal people who were looking for something better than their current lot, and were willing to put in the effort to get what they wanted. This isn’t the type of book I’d usually pick, but I found I liked the characters, and liked their story.