I didn't like movies at all until quarantine last spring. I would have been lucky if I saw a dozen movies a year, and most of those were literary adaptations, rom coms, or films with actors that I just thought were hot. In March 2020, I decided on a whim to watch Hitchcock's "To Catch a Thief" with my grandma one night, and that catapulted me into a sincere love and admiration for not only the films of Old Hollywood themselves, but also the actors who played their roles so well and had such fascinating lives off the screen, too.
It's interesting to me that almost all Old Hollywood films were basically propaganda promoting an American, capitalistic way of life; there's a long, complex, and sometimes sordid and sketchy history behind the silly screwball comedies or steamy film noirs that so many people (including myself) love. In many ways, the Old Hollywood film production system wasn't interested in creating high art at all: they were interested in churning out more and more productions with attractive actors to keep people going to the movies, and by making movie after movie that seemed like just repetitions of the same old plot. The Production (Hays) Code, established in the 1930’s, was also a form of propaganda: providing what appeared to be a clear-cut outline of American morality for films to follow, but really developing a series of codes for enlightened viewers to read between the lines of what the government would allow to be shown to the American public. Decherney is very quick to point out that the Production Code wasn’t really censorship, but it did further encode early Hollywood films as commodities rather than pieces of art. In fact, films didn’t even fall under the First Amendment freedom of speech until the 1950s: the movie business was considered just that, a business, which was “capable of evil.”
There’s a disconnect that my brain can’t quite reconcile between the films that I love, for example The Philadelphia Story (1940), with its ridiculous plot, three very attractive and appealing lead actors, funny dialogue and lovable characters, with the fact that it is part of a long history of pro-American propaganda. But anyway, context is important, and so is film history. Decherney does a solid job of condensing the history of American film into 130 pages, and I enjoyed reading his “very short introduction.”