These are some of my thoughts from my experience of reading this book that may be useful to you if you are curious about whether or not to read it yourself.
The Strengths:
Swoboda’s writing style is very easy to read. It comes across as very conversational, seeking to engage in the topic with you rather than preach it down at you from a high pulpit. In that vein, it’s also less given over to polishing up the Christian life than other books may sometimes be. He addresses some hurts and pain in the Christian experiences with refreshing frankness. Furthermore, he doesn’t claim to have a new cure or special Band-Aid, but rather a simple willingness to look at some of the wounds in the community of faith and talk about them.
He has formal academic training and knows how to cite references. But again, this is done in a less alienating way. He brings in his sources in palatable amounts for the reader. It’s rare to feel overwhelmed by academic jargon in the book. He seems very intentional about that.
One of his biggest strengths is his story-telling. He includes many anecdotal stories that are well written and, for me, resulted in some of the most memorable moments in the book. The story of the car crash in Chapter 7, in particular, sticks out to me, and I will likely carry it with me for a long time.
The Weaknesses:
The primary weakness of the book is its tendency to stray from its own topic of wandering. There are many poignant statements in the book, yet too many of them are made about topics that stray from the main path the author is attempting to carve out. The problem for me was not that this happened at all, but that it happened too frequently and took me too far off the path each time. Main topics in any given chapter led to other topics which led to yet more topics, and I began to feel lost – not in understanding, but to his purpose. I found myself asking, “Why are we talking about this?” That’s not to say that I was in disagreement with his thoughts, I simply disagreed that he should have taken the reader that way, owing to the fact that it served to weaken the point of the book and needlessly distract the reader. Ironically (and almost beautifully), this is its own type of wandering, which serves to exemplify some of the frustrations of Christian wandering. In the end, when the author attempted to come full circle at the end of each chapter and tie all the points together, it was no small task and, in my view, was not accomplished.
Another weak point for me was being left with a feeling that the topic of wandering was poorly covered. Too little time was given to the difference between “good” and “bad” wandering, with the result of a general feeling of confusion on my part as to how to best relay what I’ve learned from this book. As another reviewer has already pointed out elsewhere, the employment of Swoboda of the Israelites wandering in the desert as analogy to our own wandering felt misused in the absence of more explanation as to how the Israelites being forced to wander 40 years because of their sin relates to my all-too-natural wandering as a part of my Christian life.
Swoboda does suggest at one point that the book would address the disciplines and realities of wandering, and while I believe some of the “realities” were well hit upon, the “disciplines” side was not well developed. This left me wanting at the close of the book, as I did not feel the book did what it was intended to do at the outset. Another example of this comes from p. 17 on which the author states, “What I offer is this: a description of and hopeful vision for the wandering Christian experience.” As before, I believe the book does a better job with one of these than the other: the “hopeful vision” can be felt in the reading, but the “description” is lacking.
To the credit of the author, he does state on p.11 “Wandering, like the truth, can’t be fully explained. It can only be experienced. Wandering is, as I like to say, a sermon without an explanation.” However, as a reader, this is extremely dissatisfying when, upon finishing the last page, I felt unable to communicate what the author was really trying to say. In other words, I found myself unable to tell others about what Swoboda had attempted to say in his book with much clarity – or rather, with any more clarity than it was delivered with. The subtitle of the book is “Why Wandering Deepens Your Faith.” I do not believe the book does an adequate job addressing this “Why.” Or, more accurately, I do not believe I, having now read the book, would be able to restate why Swoboda believes wandering deepens your faith.
One way to look at the outcome of this book is that it suffers from a multitude of small and needlessly disparate truths attempting the make an impact and falling short, rather than a concentrated grouping of related truths which would have carried the true force of impact that I believe the author would have liked to achieve – and not for himself, but for the reader who he, as a pastor, is clearly more concerned about.
I give this book two stars here on Goodreads because, according to their rating system, it indicates “it was ok.” This aligns with my experience of reading the book. Other readers do have a different take on the book and I suggest balancing their thoughts with these to determine if reading The Dust Ones will be right for you.