Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Analogy of Faith: The Quest for God's Speakability

Rate this book
If God is transcendent, how can human beings speak meaningfully about him? For centuries philosophers and theologians have asked whether and how it is possible to talk about God. The shared answer to this question goes by the name of "analogy," which recognizes both similarity and difference between the divine being and human language. In the twentieth century, Karl Barth, Erich Przywara, Hans Urs von Balthasar and Eberhard Jungel explored this question in new and controversial ways that continue to shape contemporary debates in theology. InThe Analogy of Faith: The Quest for God's Speakability, Archie Spencer examines the problem of analogy in its ancient, medieval and modern forms. He argues for a Christological version of Barth's analogy of faith, informed by Jungel's analogy of advent, as the way forward for Protestant theology in answering the problem of God's speakability.

445 pages, Paperback

First published October 18, 2015

2 people are currently reading
14 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (33%)
4 stars
1 (33%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
1 (33%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Daniel Rempel.
94 reviews11 followers
January 15, 2026
This is an incredibly well researched book documenting the history of analogy from Plato through Augustine to Aquinas. After Aquinas, Spencer argues that the analogia entis is reified by Cajetan, and its this reification that Barth is combatting. Jüngel then extends Barth and forms the constructive groundwork for Spencer’s project. Compelling stuff.

Where this book struggles, however, is in its form. It’s heavily reliant on secondary sources, and not long enough to be exhaustive. However, in the breadth of research, Spencer seems to *want to be exhaustive* which results in him taking a few too many unnecessary rabbit trails. In the end, we’re left with a book too long to be a singular constructive project, but too short to be a comprehensive engagement of analogy, which the thesis really ultimately needs.

Well worth the read, however, and the Jüngel chapter sticks out as particularly exemplary.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.