This book is a set of case studies on controversial museum exhibitions in New York and D.C., mostly in the 90's. You might think it is a bit dated now, but the themes and questions Dubin addresses are still relevant. It should bring up extended questions that you can apply to your museum work. Who are the stakeholders in any one exhibition? What is the relationship between museums and the press? How can your museum prepare for bad press with good PR? Is there such a thing as bad publicity (I think the answer is yes)? How should museums engage local, state, and federal lawmakers to garner their support (or at least create aversion to opposing a museum's well researched exhibitions). How do we include multiple perspectives in an exhibition? How do we make sure we don't present a biased analysis of history or culture or art (or science, but not addressed in this book)? Are the loudest voices the most important?
I enjoyed "Displays of Power" for bringing up these questions, and for providing some context as to why museums operate a certain way now. Since the book is divided into case studies, it's easy to commit to a chapter and then put it down for a few days without loosing your train of thought on the topic. For those looking at graduate school, there are also plenty of great GRE words.